Search cases

Compare defaults: v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52 vs v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Reset

Results

Showing 3501–3525 of 7923 (page 141 / 317)
JUN022023_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 02, 2023 A. Exceptional Ability The Petitioner asserts that he meets at least three of the regulatory criteria for classification as an individual of exceptional ability. In denying the petition, the Director determined that the Petitioner fulfilled only the academic record criterion at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A). Upon review of the arguments presented on appeal,…
JUN022023_02H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 02, 2023 The Applicant is currently in the United States and seeks permission to reapply for admission pursuant to the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(j) before departing the United States. 1 The record reflects the Applicant's testimony that he paid $25,000 to a smuggler for a passport with a U.S. nonimmigrant visa, with which he entered the United States in 1994. H…
JUN022023_03H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 02, 2023 The issue on appeal is whether the Applicant should be granted conditional approval ofher application for permission to reapply in the exercise of discretion. The record reflects that the Applicant entered the United States without inspection on April 27, 2005, and she is the subject of an unexecuted in absentia removal order dated I 12005. The Applicant do…
JUN022023_04H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 02, 2023 The Applicant was admitted to the United States in B-2 nonimmigrant visitor status in November 2000. She filed an asylum application in April 2007, she was referred to immigration court in June 2007, her asylum application was denied and she was granted voluntary departure for 60 days by an Immigration Judge in May 2008, and she filed an appeal with the Bo…
JUN012023_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2023 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, filed his VA WA petition in April 2020 based on his marriage to an LPR. In support of his VA WA petition, the Petitioner initially provided, as relevant to his claim of good moral character, seven letters of support from members of his community, a professional certific…
JUN012023_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2023 The Applicant does not contest that she is inadmissible to the United States for fraud or misrepresentation. 1 The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has established extreme hardship to her qualifying relatives and, if so, whether she merits a waiver as a matter of discretion. We have reviewed the entire record as supplemented on appeal, and conclud…
JUN012023_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2023 The record reflects that in December 2018, the Petitioner, a citizen ofNigeria, filed a VA WA petition wherein she indicated that she had been married two times. With her petition, the Petitioner submitted copies of her marriage certificate, Decree Nisi of Dissolution ( decree nisi) and Certificate of Decree Absolute ( decree absolute) from her first spous…
JUN012023_03B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2023 The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen ofNigeria, married C-M-S-, 1 a United States citizen, inQ2018. He filed the instant VA WA petition in March 2020 based on that marriage. In support of the petition, the Petitioner submitted a copy of his marriage certificate, a copy of birth certificates for himselfand C-M-S-, several pages from…
JUN012023_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2023 A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in January 2016. In the underlying record, the Petitioner submitted a Supplement B, certified in December 2015 by a lieutenant ]certifying official) in the State of California's I I Police Department, the I Division (certifying agency). In response to Part 3 .1 of the Supplement…
MAY312023_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 31, 2023 The Director concluded that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. 2 Accordingly, the remaining issue to be determined on appeal is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. The first prong, substantia…
MAY312023_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 31, 2023 A. The Petitioner Was Not the Victim of Qualifying Criminal Activity The Petitioner filed the U petition in 2016 with a Supplement B signed and certified by an officer of thel !Police Department (certifying official). The certifying official indicated that felonious assault was the qualifying crime, then cited to theft in the second degree under section 9A.…
MAY302023_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 30, 2023 The Petitioner is a citizen and national of France and Israel who entered the United States as a visitor in May 2011. The Petitioner married C-F-, 1 a U.S. citizen, inl 12014 and filed the current VA WA petition based on that relationship. The VA WA petition was approved in April 2019. However, at the time of USCIS' adjudication of the related Form 1-485, A…
MAY302023_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 30, 2023 The Petitioner has not demonstrated that our decision was based on an incorrect application of law or U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) policy. On motion, the Petitioner reiterates the arguments made on appeal. The Petitioner contends that users was wrong in deciding that law enforcement did not detect, investigate, or prosecute qualifying…
MAY302023_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 30, 2023 Because the Director did not address the underlying issue ofwhether the Petitioner meets the eligibility criteria of the EB-2 classification, we will reserve that issue, as the identified reasons for dismissal are dispositive of the Petitioner's appeal. See INS v. Bagamasbad, 429 U.S . 24, 25 (1976) (stating that"courts and agencies are not required to make…
MAY302023_03B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 30, 2023 The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, last entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in December 1989, and married her LPR spouse, J-H-, 1 in California inD 1999. She filed the instant VA WA petition in November 2019 based on a claim of battery and extreme cruelty by J-H-. The Petitioner submitted…
MAY302023_05B5203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 30, 2023 The Petitioner proposes to work in the United States as an entrepreneur in the field of educational consulting. She holds a master of education degree in international education policy and manarmentl from I ~ University in I I Tennessee, and a master's diploma in arts from I University in the country of Georgia. The Director determined that the Petitioner e…
MAY302023_06B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 30, 2023 The Petitioner proposes to work in the United States as a physical therapy specialist having worked in the healthcare field in Brazil. She holds a licentiate in physical therapy froml I in Brazil and a post-graduation certificate in specialization in respiratory physical therapy and intensive care from Centro Universitario dal lin Brazil.3 The Director dete…
MAY262023_01B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 26, 2023 users approves a petition if "the facts stated in [it] are true" and the beneficiary qualifies for the requested immigrant visa category. Section 204(b) of the Act. A petition includes its supporting evidence - including a labor certification. 8 e.F.R. § 103.2(b)(l). Thus, users cannot approve a petition if the facts stated on an accompanying labor certific…
MAY262023_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 26, 2023 The Petitioner, a citizen of Nigeria, entered the United States in December 2015 with a visitor visa. The Petitioner married R-T-, 1 a U.S. citizen, inl 12016. The Petitioner filed her VA WA petition in June 2019 based on her marriage with R-T-. According to documents submitted with the petition, the Petitioner divorced her first spouse, S-U-, inl 12015. Th…
MAY262023_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 26, 2023 The Petitioner was born on I I 2000. The Petitioner filed his SIJ ~etition, which was received by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) onl2021. The Director denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner was ineligible for SIJ classification because he was 21 years old when his SIJ petition was filed. The Petitioner does not contest the un…
MAY252023_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 25, 2023 The Applicant, a citizen of Mexico, last entered the United States without inspection in 2000. She was granted U nonimmigrant status from May 2010 until May 2014 and extended her U nonimmigrant status until August 2020. The Applicant filed her U adjustment application in July 2020. The Director issued a request for evidence (RFE) for additional documentatio…
MAY252023_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 25, 2023 The Petitioner qualifies for EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional based upon her doctor of education degree in educational leadership from the University I I which she obtained in 2020. The Petitioner also received a master of arts in Christian education from,___________ ___,in 2012. At the time of filing the petition, she had been employe…
MAY252023_01B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 25, 2023 The priority date in this matter is March 22, 2021, the date on which the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) received the DOL ETA Form 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification, for processing. On the ETA Form 9089, the annual proffered wage is listed as $25,230. The Petitioner does not assert, and the record does not support the conclusion, that…
MAY252023_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 25, 2023 The Petitioner is a citizen and national of Nigeria who last entered the United States in 2005 with advanced Jarole. The Petitioner married her second spouse, E-B-, 1 ins:22004 and divorced him in I 2007. The Petitioner then married P-J-P-, a U.S. citizen, in 12008. In! I 2015, the Petitioner was convicted of Arson under Texas Penal Code Annotated (Tex. Pen…
MAY252023_01D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 25, 2023 The Petitioner filed his U petition in 2015 based on having been the victim offelonious assault. With his U petition he submitted a 2015 Supplement B signed by a certifying official from the I I .______ _,!Police Department in North Carolina. The Supplement B indicated, in relevant part, that the Petitioner has been, is being, or is likely to be helpful in…
Prev Page 141 / 317 Next