Search cases

Compare defaults: v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52 vs v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Reset

Results

Showing 3901–3925 of 7923 (page 157 / 317)
MAR102023_03H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 10, 2023 The Applicant has been found inadmissible for fraud or willful misrepresentation, specifically for making a material misrepresentation in order to obtain and maintain F-1 nonimmigrant student status in the United States, as described in the Director's decision. The Applicant does not contest, and the record supports, the Director's determination of the Appl…
MAR092023_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 09, 2023 The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was granted U-2 nonimmigrant status from March 2014 to October 201 7, and timely filed his U adjustment application in October 201 7. The Director denied the application, concluding that the Applicant had not submitted sufficient evidence to establish that he merited a favorable exercise of discretion. In our M…
MAR092023_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 09, 2023 The Petitioner indicates he is and intends to continue working in the United States as a professional baseball player. The Petitioner did not indicate, and the record does not establish, that he has received a major, internationally recognized award pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3). The Petitioner must therefore demonstrate his eligibility under at least…
MAR092023_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 09, 2023 The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Brazil, earned a university degree in business management. Since 2006, she has served as an administrative manager of an agricultural business in her home country. In her initial filing, the Petitioner proposed using her business knowledge and experience to help U.S. companies improve their operations. The Director is…
MAR092023_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 09, 2023 On this motion to reconsider, the Applicant again contends that our previous dismissal was in error because he is not inadmissible to the United States under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act and that, in the alternative, he has established his eligibility for the waiver under section 212(i) based on a claim of extreme hardship to his lawful permanent resi…
MAR092023_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 09, 2023 The Director determined that the Petitioner established his eligibility as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. 2 The issue on appeal is whether he meets the requirements of the three prongs of the Dhanasar analytical framework and otherwise merits a national interest waiver as a matter of discretion. As a preliminary matter, we will addr…
MAR092023_03B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 09, 2023 The Director determined the Petitioner qualifies for the underlying EB-2 classification. Therefore, the remaining issue is whether the Petitioner has established eligibility for a national interest waiver under the Dhanasar framework. While we do not discuss each piece of evidence individually, we have reviewed and considered each one. The appeal contains a…
MAR092023_04B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 09, 2023 The Petitioner initially claimed to qualify for classification as a member of the professions with an advanced degree. After the Director issued a notice of intent to deny (NOID), the Petitioner asserted an alternative claim of exceptional ability and she has not further pursued her initial claim to be a member of the professions holding an advanced degree.…
MAR092023_05B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 09, 2023 In order to be eligible for a national interest waiver, a petitioner must first establish eligibility under the EB-2 immigrant classification. The Director's decision did not address this initial requirement. The record includes copies of two diplomas earned by the Petitioner, master of science degrees in international business and international marketing,…
MAR082023_01B2203
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2023 The Petitioner received his doctor of philosophy in human pathology and infectious diseases from [ l University in 2018. Since 2019 he has been employed by Universit l I as a postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Bioengineering's I . A. Evidentiary Criteria Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has received a major, in…
MAR082023_01B5203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2023 A. Job Offer The Petitioner filed its Form 1-140 petition on January 28, 2022, retaining a priority date of April 2, 2021. On the Form 1-140, under "Part 6. Basic Information About the Proposed Employment," the Petitioner checked the "no" box in response to question 6, "[i]s this a permanent position?"1 The Director issued a request for evidence (RFE), whic…
MAR082023_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2023 The issues presented on appeal are whether the Applicant is statutorily eligible for permission to reapply for admission into the United States and whether his application should be granted in the exercise of discretion. A. Inadmissibility As stated above, the Applicant has been found inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(C)(i)(I) of the Act for entering th…
MAR082023_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2023 As noted above, the Applicant had submitted a Form 1-601 to overcome grounds of inadmissibility found in sections 212(a)(6)(C)(i) and 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(II) of the Act. In support of her Form 1-601, the Applicant asserted that her spouse would suffer extreme hardship if he moved to Peru because he would be separated from three of his children from a prior marr…
MAR082023_02B5203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2023 As noted, the Director determined that the Petitioner, who claims eligibility for the EB-2 classification as both an advanced degree professional and as an individual of exceptional ability, qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. However, the Director determined that the record did not establish his eligibility under the first…
MAR082023_04B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2023 The Petitioner earned a doctor of pharmacy degree from a U.S. university. Therefore, she qualifies for the EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional. The remaining issue to be determined is whether she has established eligibility for a national interest waiver under the Dhanasar framework. While we do not discuss each piece of evidence individu…
MAR072023_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2023 The Petitioner is a mixed martial arts (MMA) athlete who intends to represent the United States in national and international competitions and, "in the future, coach future American athletes for the world leadership in this field." The Director concluded that the Petitioner has not established that he has received a major, internationally recognized prize o…
MAR072023_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2023 The issue to be addressed in this decision is whether the Petitioner established that she qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree or as an individual of exceptional ability. 1 Section101 (a)(32) of the Act, 8 USC § 1101 (a)(32), provides that "[t]he term 'profession' shall include but not be limited to architects, engineers, lawy…
MAR072023_01B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2023 As noted above, the Director revoked his previous approval of this petition. In our decision on appeal, we concluded that the Director provided adequate notification of that revocation, and that the Petitioner had not demonstrated that its delay in filing a motion to reopen that revocation decision, filed more than 15 months later, was reasonable and beyon…
MAR072023_01M1244
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2023 The sole issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has shown that he has been continuously residing in the United States since July 29, 2021, and that he has been continuously physically present in the United States since August 3, 2021. We have reviewed the entire record, as supplemented on appeal and conclude that he has not made such a showing. The record…
MAR072023_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2023 The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus of a labor certification, would be in the national interest For the reasons discussed below, the Petitioner has no…
MAR072023_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2023 The record reflects that the Petitioner's criminal history includes five convictions for possession of dangerous drugs in the Bahamas - in 1990, 1991, 1992, and 1994 - and an arrest for larceny and obtaining property by false pretense in the United States in 2013. In our prior decision, incorporated here by reference, we agreed with the Director's finding t…
MAR072023_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2023 The Director determined that the Applicant is inadmissible under section 212(i) of Act (the Act) for misrepresentation of material facts in connection with her asylum application, her birth certificate, and concealment of her marital history. We adopt and affirm the Director's well-reasoned decision, with the comments below. See Matter of Burbano, 20 l&N De…
MAR072023_03H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2023 The Applicant on appeal does not contest the Director's determination of her inadmissibility under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud or misrepresentation, a finding supported by the record.1 Instead, she asserts that she is eligible for a waiver of her inadmissibility pursuant to section 212(i) of the Act. The only issue before us is whether she…
MAR072023_04B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2023 The Petitioner is an information security specialist who proposed to work in the United States as a consultant in the fields of information technology and cybersecurity. He holds the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree in information systems and has worked in the field of information technology for more than 14 years. The Director determined that…
MAR062023_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 06, 2023 The Petitioner is the coordinator of the English language pathways at I I Community Collegel I awarded the Petitioner with its excellence in teaching award in 2022, and she was nominated for thel !Community College System's excellence in teaching award. Because the Petitioner has not indicated or shown that she received a major, internationally recognized a…
Prev Page 157 / 317 Next