Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 4276–4300 of 7923 (page 172 / 317)
DEC162022_01D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 16, 2022
—
The Applicant is a citizen of the Philippines who first entered the United States in December 2005, and again in November 2007 and October 2009, as an H-2B nonimmigrant to be employed as a housekeeper in a hotel. She filed her T application in September 2019 on the basis that she was the victim oflabor trafficking by her U.S. employer.
A. The Applicant's T…
DEC162022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 16, 2022
—
In September 2016, the Petitioner filed a U petition on the basis of her victimization from abuse by her former spouse at the same time she filed a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, requesting that the Directorreopen a U petition filed in November 2013 .1 The Director rejected this Form I-2 90B because it was not submitted with the proper filing fee…
DEC162022_01D2101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 16, 2022
—
Upon review, we find that the Director's statements in the NOIR were adequate to notify the Petitioner of the intent to revoke approval of the petition in accordance with the statutory provisions at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(ll)(iii)(A)(2) and (4). The director initially approved the petition in January 2020. After the petition's approval, USCIS conducted a site…
DEC162022_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 16, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, states that he entered the United States without being inspected and admitted in 1977, briefly departed in 1980, and reentered without inspection and admission approximately one month later. The record reflects that U.s. 1 immigration authorities placed him in deportation proceedings, and he was deported to Mex…
DEC162022_02D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 16, 2022
—
A. Procedural History
In July 2015 , the Petitioner filed a U petition on the basis of the crime of perjury perpetrated against him by D-C-, 1 his former attorney. In denying this U petition, the Director determined that although the qualifying crime of perjury had been detected, investigated, and prosecuted as perpetrated against the Petitioner, the record…
DEC152022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 15, 2022
—
The Applicant, a citizen of Ecuador, was granted U nonimmigrant status in October 2014. The Applicant filed the U adjustment application in August 2018. The Director denied the application, determining that the Applicant had not demonstrated that their adjustment of status to that of an LPR was justified on humanitarian grounds, to ensure family unity, or w…
DEC152022_01B4203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 15, 2022
—
The Petitioner stated that it intends to employ the Beneficiary in an executive capacity. The Director determined that the Petitioner had not met its burden of proof in this regard."Executive capacity" means an assignment within an organization in which the employee primarily directs the management of the organization or a major component or function of the…
DEC152022_01D6101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 15, 2022
—
The Director determined the evidence was insufficient to establish the parties' bona fide intent to enter into a valid marriage and denied the petition. The Director reached this conclusion for two reasons. First, the Petitioner provided two versions of her plans for a wedding. In one version, the Petitioner explained that she wishes to get married in the U…
DEC152022_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 15, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Peru, first entered the United States on January 15, 2001 with a valid nonimmigrant visitor visa (B-1/B-2) and an authorized temporary stay until February 14, 2001. He timely departed the United States on February 13, 2001. The Applicant was again admitted to the United States on August 1 7, 2001 as a nonimmigrant visi…
DEC152022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 15, 2022
—
The Applicant does not contest the finding of inadmissibility, which is supported by the record. The issues on appeal therefore are whether the Applicant has established extreme hardship to a qualifying relative and whether he merits a favorable exercise of discretion. Upon consideration of the entire record, including the arguments made on appeal, we concl…
DEC142022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 14, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, first entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in approximately 1996, when she was 10 years of age. She experienced a history of domestic violence in the United States at the hands of her former partner, D-J-, 1 who is also the father to three of her four U.S. citizen children. The rec…
DEC142022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 14, 2022
—
The Director determined that the Petitioner qualifies for the underlying EB-2 classification. The issue on appeal is whether the Petitioner has established eligibility for a national interest waiver under the Dhanasar framework. While we do not discuss each piece of evidence individually, we have reviewed and considered each one. The Petitioner plans to con…
DEC142022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 14, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History On March 21, 2014, the Petitioner entered the United States using a Mali assport and a B2 nonimmigrant visa, both of which were fraudulently obtained. On 2015, when the Petitioner was 16 years old, the Family Court of the State of New York in (Family Court) issued a FINAL ORDER OF CUSTODY, awarding custody to M-K-, 1…
DEC142022_03C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 14, 2022
—
Inl 2018, the Circuit Court for (Circuit Court), in Maryland, appointed guardianship of A-S-2, the Petitioner, to G-S- in an ORDER OF COURT Concurrently, the Circuit
Court issued an ORDER REGARDING MINOR'S ELIGIBILITY FOR SPECIAL IMMIGRANT
JUVENILE STATUS PURSUANT TO FL§ 1-201(b)(J0) (SIJ order), determining that the Petitioner's reunification with his par…
DEC132022_01A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 13, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico , was granted U-3 status from February 2013 until February 2021, and timely filed the instant U adjustment application in May 2020. The Director determined that the Applicant had not complied with 8 C.F.R § 245 .24(d)(5), because he did not provide all pages of all passports valid during his U nonimmigrant statu…
DEC132022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 13, 2022
—
A. Motion to Reopen The first issue on motion is whether the petition should be reopened and approved based on new facts supported by documentary evidence. 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2). On motion, the Petitioner provides two new letters of support from and ______ I singers who have received the immigrant visa classification that the Petitioner is requesting. The…
DEC132022_01B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 13, 2022
—
A. Ability to Pay the Proffered Wage A petitioner must demonstrate its continuing ability to pay the proffered wage of an offered position, from a petition's priority date until a beneficiary obtains lawful permanent residence. 8 e.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). This petition's priority date is May 26, 2015, the date DOL accepted the Petitioner's labor certification a…
DEC132022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 13, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, married a U.S. citizen, J-N-, 1 in 12010. They resided together from July 2008 until January 2013. In June 2019, the Petitioner filed the instant VA WA petition based on his marriage to J-N-, claiming that she engaged in abusive behavior. The Director denied the VA WA petition, concluding that the Petitioner h…
DEC132022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 13, 2022
—
Inl I 2017, the Petitioner entered the United States unlawfully. He was apprehended by Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), and later an asylum officer conducted a credible fear interview. Inl I 2018, when the Petitioner was 19 years old, the Chancery Court of the I I Judicial District of I I in Mississippi (Chancery Court) issued a DECREE APPOINTING GUARDIAN (…
DEC132022_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 13, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, last entered the United States in 1994 without admission, inspection or parole. In September 2018, she filed the instant T petition, asserting that she was the victim of labor trafficking. The Director denied the T application concluding that the record did not establish that she was physically present in the U…
DEC132022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 13, 2022
—
The Petitioner claimed in his Forms 1-918 and 1-192 to have last entered the United States in 1994 without inspection or parole. The Director determined that the Petitioner was inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(A)(i) as an alien present without admission or parole. The Petitioner had sought a waiver of this ground of inadmissibility through the filing of…
DEC132022_01H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 13, 2022
—
A. Facts and Procedural History The record reflects that the Applicant is a native and citizen of China who claims to have entered the United States without inspection in 1995. The Applicant filed a Form 1-589, Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal, and in 1996 was issued a Form 1-221, Order to Show Cause, placing him in removal proceedings.…
DEC132022_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 13, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States without inspection in 2008. On I 2011, the Petitioner was issued a Form 1-862, Notice to Appear, placing him in removal proceedings as being present without admission or parole.1 On I 2011, he married a U.S. citizen, O-C-P-C-,2 with whom he claims he resided from November 2010 until A…
DEC132022_02D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 13, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a 56-year-old native and citizen of Mexico, claims to have last entered the United States without inspection around November 199 5. The record shows that between approximately□ and I 2011, the Petitioner's adult brother, F-, 1 was repeatedly raped by their sister-in-law's brother, 0-. The Petitioner filed the instant U petition in November 2…
DEC132022_02H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 13, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant is the beneficiary of an approved immigrant visa petition filed on his behalf by his U.S. citizen mother in 2006. After entering the United States without inspection in 1986, the Applicant was granted voluntary departure but did not timely depart the United States, and the voluntary departure order was converted to an…