Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 4326–4350 of 7923 (page 174 / 317)
DEC072022_02B7203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 07, 2022
—
According to page 2 of the petition, the Petitioner invested $500,0004 in the NCE. He presented to the Chief two business plans, dated June 2016 and October 2020, respectively. 5 Page 5 of the 2016 business plan indicates that the NCE intends to fund "the establishment of a I in the area I " Pages 8 and 9 of the 2016 business plan explain that the NCE "is o…
DEC072022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 07, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in November 2016. On I I 2020, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Superior Court of California, _______ __,Probate Division (probate court) issued a Minute Order (SIJ order) granting a petition for appointment of guardianship of the P…
DEC072022_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 07, 2022
—
The Applicant was found inadmissible for fraud or misrepresentation under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for entering the United States using a fraudulent passport and visa. The Applicant does not contest this determination on appeal, and it is supported by the record. Thus, the remaining issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has demonstrated that…
DEC072022_03B7203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 07, 2022
—
According to page 2 of the petition, the Petitioner invested $500,0003 in the NCE. She presented to the Chief two business plans, dated June 2016 and October 2020, respectively. 4 Page 5 of the 2016 business plan indicates that the NCE intends to fund "the establishment of al I in the area " Pages 8 and 9 of the 2016 business plan explain that the NCE "is o…
DEC062022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 06, 2022
—
The Applicant was granted U nonimmigrant status from October 2013 to October 2017. In December 2016, she filed the instant U adjustment application. In July 2017, the Director issued a request for evidence (RFE) seeking arrest reports and court documentation regarding the conviction status for each of the Applicant's arrests. In October 2017, the Applicant…
DEC062022_01B7203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 06, 2022
—
According to page 2 of the petition, the Petitioner invested $500,0003 in the NCE. He presented to the Chief two business plans, dated June 2016 and October 2020, respectively.4 Page 5 of the 2016 business plan indicates that the NCE intends to fund "the establishment of al I in the areal I Pages 8 and 9 of the 2016 business plan explain that the NCE "is ow…
DEC062022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 06, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed his VA WA petition in August 2018. In considering the VA WA petition, the Director reviewed the evidence on the record, including a personal statement from the Petitioner, a May 2018 psychological evaluation, a prescription for an antidepressant, undated photographs, and third-party statements describingmistreatmentof the Petitioner by…
DEC062022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 06, 2022
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History Inl 12016, when the Petitioner was 20 years of age, the Family Court inl New York issued an order appointing a guardian for the Petitioner in proceedings brought under section 661 of the New York Family Court Act (N.Y. Fam. Ct. Act) and section 1707 of the New York Surrogate's Court Procedure Act (N.Y. Surr. Ct. P…
DEC062022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 06, 2022
—
The Applicant was found inadmissible for fraud or misrepresentation under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for entering the United States using a fraudulent passport and visa. The Applicant does not contest this determination on appeal, and it is supported by the record. Thus, the remaining issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has demonstrated that…
DEC062022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 06, 2022
—
Inl I 2015, thel I Family Court dete1mined, among other findings necessary for SIJ eligibility under section 101 (a)(27)(J) of the Act, that the Petitioner is "dependent on the Family Court." The Family Court also found that the Petitioner was neglected and abandoned by his parents while he was in their care and "they are not willing to provide the required…
DEC052022_01B5203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 05, 2022
—
A. Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced Degree We withdraw the Director's determination that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. To qualify as a member of the professions, an individual must meet "one of the occupations listed in section 10l(a)(32) of the Act, as well as any occupation for which a Uni…
DEC052022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 05, 2022
—
In May 2012, the Petitioner, a native of Trinidad and Tobago, filed a VA WA petition as a parent of an abusive U.S. citizen child, M-P-. 2 The Director denied this petition, concluding that because evidence in the record showed that M-P- was under the age of 21 when the petition was filed, the Petitioner had not demonstrated a qualifying relationship as a p…
DEC052022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 05, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2017, when the Petitioner was 17 years old, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division - Family Part,I !(Family Court) issued an order (custody order) granting temporary sole custody of the Petitioner to K-E-C- 2, the Petitioner's mother. Additionally, in the custody order, the Family Court found the Peti…
DEC052022_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 05, 2022
—
The Applicant does not dispute that he entered the United States without inspection in the 1980s and was subsequently ordered removed in 2014. Despite having been ordered removed from the United
States, he has remained in the United States. Therefore, the Applicant will trigger inadmissibility under section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act upon his departure. T…
DEC052022_01M1244
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 05, 2022
—
The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has demonstrated eligibility for TPS re-registration or, in the alternative for late initial TPS registration. We have reviewed the record of proceedings before us and for the reasons explained below conclude that the has not established he qualifies for TPS under either scenario. The record reflects that the A…
DEC052022_02C6101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 05, 2022
—
The record reflects that in 201 8, when the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, was 16 years old, the Circuit Court for _______ Mary land ( circuit court) granted guardianship of him to his brother, H-R-. 2 The circuit court further issued an order entitled Order Regarding Factual Findings for Minor's Eligibility for Special Immigrant Juvenile St…
DEC052022_02M1244
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 05, 2022
—
The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has established that she meets any of the eligibility criteria for late initial TPS registration set forth in the regulations and, if so whether she has demonstrated that she satisfies the continuous residence and physical presence requirements under the Honduran TPS designation. We have reviewed the record as…
DEC052022_03M1244
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 05, 2022
—
In our previous decision, which we incorporate here by reference, we acknowledged the Applicant's claim that although he had been residing in Florida since 2012 , he was unable to provide employment and financial records due to the lack of legal status in the United States. Nevertheless, we concluded that the evidence he did submit in support of his TPS req…
DEC052022_04M1244
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 05, 2022
—
The issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has established that he is not subject to the persecutor bar. As stated, the Director determined that the Applicant was ineligible for TPS under section 244( c )(2)(B)(ii) of the Act because of his past involvement in persecution while he served under the
Salvadoran military command. In making this determination…
DEC052022_06M1244
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 05, 2022
—
The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has established that she is a Haitian national and, if so whether she has demonstrated that she has been continually residing in the United States since July 29, 2021, and that she has been continuously physically present in the United States since August 3, 2021. We have reviewed the entire record as supplemen…
DEC022022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 02, 2022
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History In 2018, when the Petitioner was 17 years old, the !Family Court in New York appointed guardianship of the Petitioner to his uncle (uncle/guardian), finding that such appointment would last "until the subject's 21st birthday." Order Appointing Guardian of the Person, dated 2018 (guardianship order). In a separate…
DEC022022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 02, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In May 2016, the Petitioner filed his U petition with a Supplement B signed and certified by a lieutenant for the Sheriff's Department in I California ( certifying official). The ce1iifying official checked boxes indicatingthatthe Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to "Felonious Assau…
DEC022022_02H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 02, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant was ordered removed in I I 2004 and that he was removed from the United States onl 12012. As discussed, section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act provides that any noncitizen who has been ordered removed or departed the United States while an
order of removal was outstanding, and who seeks admission within 10 years of the d…
DEC012022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 01, 2022
—
By regulation, the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision." 8 C.F.R. § 103 .5(a)(l )(i). Accordingly, we examine any new facts to the extent that they pertain to our prior dismissal of the Petitioner's appeal.
In support of the motion to reopen, the Petitioner submits a brief, asserting that his prior attorney, who represented the Petitioner a…
DEC012022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 01, 2022
—
The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus of a labor certification, would be in the national interest For the reasons discussed below, the Petitioner has no…