Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 4701–4725 of 7923 (page 189 / 317)
OCT062022_02C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 06, 2022
—
A Relevant Facts and Procedural History ln 2018, the Petitioner, at age nine, entered the United States without inspection. Soon after entering the United States, the Petitioner was apprehended by immigration officials and placed into the custody of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), Division of Unaccompan…
OCT062022_03B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 06, 2022
—
The Director concluded that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. Accordingly, the issue to be determined on appeal is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. For the reasons discussed below, we agr…
OCT062022_03C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 06, 2022
—
A. Relevant Background and Procedural History On 2017, when the Petitioner was 19 years old, the Probate Court of Alabama (Family Court), issued a Guardianship Order (SIJ order) appointing M-G-D-L-C-, 2 the Petitioner's sister, as the Petitioner's guardian pursuant to section 26-2A-70 of the Code of Alabama 1975 (Ala. Code 1975). In this order, the Family C…
OCT052022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 05, 2022
—
Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has received a major, internationally recognized award at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3), he must meet at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). In denying the petition, the Director determined that the Beneficiary satisfied only two of the initial evidentiar…
OCT052022_01B4203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 05, 2022
—
In June 2017, the present Petitioner filed a Form I-140 petition on the Beneficiary's behalf, with the annotation that the 2017 petition seeks to amend a prior2012 petition filed by anotheremployer.1 The Director denied the 201 7 petition in April 2020, citing multiple disqualifying deficiencies. The Petitioner's appellate brief consists entirely of argumen…
OCT052022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 05, 2022
—
As a preliminary matter, we note that by regulation, the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision." 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i). The issue before us is whether the Petitioner has submitted new facts to warrant reopening or has established that our decision to dismiss the prior combined motion was based on an incorrect application of law or USCIS po…
OCT052022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 05, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner entered the United States on a B-2 visitor visa in July 2013, when she was 14 years old. In I 2014, the Petitioner's mother signed a Consent of Natural Mother for Termination of Parental Rights and Adoption (consent order). Inl I 2014, when the Petitioner was 16 years old, the Circuit Court of the[=1 J…
OCT052022_01H6212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 05, 2022
—
The record indicates that the Applicant entered the United States on August 17, 2014, with authorization to stay for 30 days, but she remained beyond her period of authorized stay. She did not depart the United States until the end of March 2015. She therefore accrued more than 180 days but less than 1 year of unlawful physical presence in the United States…
OCT052022_02H6212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 05, 2022
—
A. Immigration History
The Applicant entered the United States in 2010 without being inspected, admitted, or paroled and he began accruing unlawful presence. After a series of events, the Applicant was granted voluntary departure in 2019 and departed the United States later that same year. Subsequently, the Applicant sought admission to the United States by…
OCT042022_01C6101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of China, submitted an SIJ petition in February 2020 when he was 17 years old. The Petitioner included an order from the Family Court of the State of New YorkJ I appointing H-L-,2 his aunt, as his guardian in guardianship proceedings. He submitted a separate order titled SPECIAL FINDINGS (SIJ ord…
OCT042022_01D7101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2022
—
As noted, the Director denied the petition based on a determination that the Petitioner did not establish that (1) its parent company is doing business abroad, and (2) the Beneficiary had the required one year of qualifying employment abroad with the Petitioner's parent company. At the time of filing in December 2019, the Petitioner submitted a current busi…
OCT042022_01D8101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2022
—
Because the Petitioner did not establish that the Beneficiary has received a major, internationally recognized award, it must demonstrate that the Beneficiary satisfies at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(l)-(8). The Director determined that the Petitioner established that the Beneficiary met only one criter…
OCT042022_01H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2022
—
The Applicant does not dispute her inadmissibility. The record establishes that the Applicant entered the United States in 1997 and, in 1999, an Immigration Judge (IJ) ordered her removed. Despite having been ordered removed from the United States, the Applicant has remained in the United States for more than 20 years thereafter. Therefore, the Applicant wi…
OCT042022_01H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2022
—
The Applicant admits she is inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act because she misrepresented material facts on a Form 1-821, Application for Temporary Protected Status, and travelled with advance parole that she would not have been able to apply for but for the misrepresentations made on the Form 1-821 applications and renewals. The Charlest…
OCT042022_02C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2020, when the Petitioner was 17 years old, the0Judicial District Court, Louisiana (juvenile court) issued an order titled Amended Order (SIJ order), awarding custody of the Petitioner to K-S-.1 The order also included the juvenile court's determinations that the Petitioner's parents were "negligent in the supervi…
OCT042022_02H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2022
—
A. Background
In 1993 the Applicant utilized a photo substituted passport and visa in an attempt to enter the United States. The former Immigration and Naturalization Service placed the Applicant in exclusion proceedings and found her inadmissible under sections 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for the fraud, 212(a)(7)(A)(i) of the Act as an immigrant who is not…
OCT042022_03C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2022
—
Onl I 2020, the Circuit Court of Maryland (Family Court) appointed custody of the Petitioner to I-M-V-M-.2 In a separate order titled ORDER FOR FINDINGS SUFFICIENT FOR SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE STATUS (SIJ order), the Family Court made determinations necessary for SIJ eligibility under section 10l(a)(27)(J) of the Act. The Family Court determined that reun…
OCT042022_04C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2022
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History In 2015, when the Petitioner, a native and citizen of India, was 20 years old, thel New York Family Court issued an 0rder-Spedallmmigran tJuvenile Status (SIJ Status Order) which states, in pe1iinent part: This Court, after examining the motion papers and supporting affidavits, all the pleadings and prior proceedi…
OCT042022_05C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2022
—
In 2017 a District Court in North Carolina issued a Child Custody Order (custody order) granting sole physical and legal custody of the Petitioner to B-D-. 1 The District Court further found that the Petitioner's reunification with his parents is not viable due to their abandonment and neglect under state law, "based in their withholding of affection, prote…
OCT032022_01B2203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 03, 2022
—
The Petitioner asserts that he qualifies as "an individual of extraordinary ability in the highly specialized field of transnational corporate law, particularly for his expertise in complex transactions involving commercial tax and labor laws and regulations." Because the Petitioner has not indicated or shown that he received a major, internationally recogn…
OCT032022_01B6203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 03, 2022
—
The job offer portion of the labor certification underlying a pet1t10n for a professional "must demonstrate that the job requires the minimum of a baccalaureate degree." 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(1)(3)(i). In addition, the beneficiary must meet all of the requirements of the offered position set forth on the labor certification by the priority date of the petition.…
OCT032022_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 03, 2022
—
The Applicant has satisfied the conditions in section 320(a)(l) of the Act prior to her eighteenth I b'rthd as as birth certificate evidence shows that she was born outside the United States in Jamaica in 2002 and her father's June 2020 Certificate of Naturalization shows that she has a parent who is a U.S. citizen through naturalization. She also met the d…
OCT032022_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 03, 2022
—
The Applicant is currently in the United States and seeks permission to reapply for admission so that he can adjust his status. He does not contest that he is inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act for having been previously ordered removed. The Director denied his application for permission to reapply for admission because he failed to esta…
OCT032022_02B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 03, 2022
—
A. Evidentiary Criteria
Because the Petitioner has not claimed or established that she received a major, internationally recognized award, she must satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). The Director determined that the Petitioner met three of the claimed evidentiary criteria relating to published mater…
SEP272022_01A3013
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 27, 2022
—
Although the Director denied the application solely because the evidence did not demonstrate that compelling reasons render the Applicant unable to return to I l we have identified additional bases of the Applicant's ineligibility for adjustment of status under Section 13, as the evidence also does not show that the Applicant performed diplomatic or semi-di…