Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 4801–4825 of 7923 (page 193 / 317)
SEP152022_01H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 15, 2022
—
The Director determined that the Applicant was inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud or misrepresentation of a material fact for the purpose of procuring a benefit under the Act. The Applicant does not contest the finding of inadmissibility, a determination supported by the record, as he admitted on his Form 1-485, Application for…
SEP152022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 15, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History Jn.c=J 2018, when the Petitioner was 18 years old, the Judicial District Court of I I New Mexico (District Court) issued an ORDER AWARDING SOLE LEGAL CUSTODY TO RESPONDENT AND ENTRY OF SPECIAL FINDINGS (custody order). In the custody order, the District Court found that it has "continuing jurisdiction over the child"…
SEP152022_03C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 15, 2022
—
The record establishes that the Petitioner's date of birth is l9, 1999. Onc=J 10, 2020, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Family Court of the State of New York (Family Court) issued a Special Findings Order - Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJ order), in which it determined that the Petitioner was dependent on the District Court; that the Petiti…
SEP152022_04C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 15, 2022
—
The Petitioner was born onl 14, 1997. onl I 2018, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Superior Court of I California (Superior Court) issued an order entitled Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings (SIJ order). The Superior Court placed the Petitioner in the custody of an individual appointed by the Court and made other SIJ-related determinations. Based…
SEP152022_06C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 15, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 12020, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the ______ ___,Children's Probate Court (Children's Court) inl !Connecticut issued an order appointing the Petitioner's maternal grandmother, her adoptive mother, as her guardian in guardianship proceedings brought under sections 45a-616 and 45a-608n of the General Stat…
SEP152022_07C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 15, 2022
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History In I 2018, when the Petitioner was 19 years old, the Superior Court of California, I I I (Family Court) issued an order appointing N-K-D-, 2 the Petitioner's cousin, as her guardian in guardianship proceedings brought under sections 1510 and 1514 of the California Probate Code. The order stated that "extension of…
SEP152022_08C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 15, 2022
—
In our prior decision, we found the Petitioner ineligible for SIJ classification because the probate and family court's order did not contain a qualifying parental reunification determination. Specifically, we found the court order insufficient because the order does not establish the state law basis for the court's determination that the Petitioner's reuni…
SEP142022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner is a competitive athlete and coach in Brazilian jiu-jitsu and has successfully competed in in the I I category at regional, national, and international jiu-jitsu competitions. Because the Petitioner does not claim, and the record does not establish, that he has received a major, internationally recognized award under…
SEP142022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
A. Eligibility for the Requested Classification As stated above, the first step to establishing eligibility for a national interest waiver is demonstrating qualification for the underlying EB-2 visa classification, as either an advanced degree professional or an individual of exceptional ability. 3 While we may ultimately agree with the Director that the Pe…
SEP142022_01B6203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
The petition was filed with USCIS on October 18, 2016, accompanied by a labor certification that was filed with the DOL on May 18, 2016, and certified on July 27, 2016. The petition was approved on December 28, 2016. However, on February 11, 2020, the Director issued a notice of intent to revoke (NOIR) the approval, pointing to information revealed during t…
SEP142022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Georgia, entered the United States in December 2016 on a nonimmigrant visitor visa. He filed the instant VA WA petition in January 2019, claiming that he had been subjected to battery and extreme cruelty by his U.S. citizen spouse, T-R-.1 The Director denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner had not establi…
SEP142022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
As previously stated, SIJ classification may only be granted upon the consent of DHS, through USCIS, when petitioners meet all the other eligibility criteria. Section 101(a)(27)(J)(i)-(iii) of the Act. To warrant USCIS' consent,juveniles must establish that a primary reason the required juvenile court determinations were sought was to obtain relief from par…
SEP142022_01H2212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
The record indicates that the Applicant departed the United States and returned to her native Nigeria to obtain a U.S. immigrant visa from DOS after USCIS' approval of her Form I-601A, Application for Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver. Subsequent to her interviews with a consular officer, her visa application was denied after the DOS determined that she…
SEP142022_02B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
The Petitioner is currently employed in the United States as a erformer for the I I He was a member of the Russian national team for man ears and earned a silver team medal in the 2009 I I Championships on the The record includes contracts for his continued employment as a performer with
A. Evidentiary Criteria
As noted above, the Director concluded that t…
SEP142022_02C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
In our decision dismissing the Petitioner's combined motion to reopen and reconsider, incorporated here by reference, we determined that the Petitioner had not met his burden to establish eligibility for the SIJ classification because the record lacked a qualifying parental reunification determination. Specifically, we indicated that the record contained an…
SEP142022_02H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
The record reflects that in August 2006, the Applicant entered the United States with a visitor's visa with authorization to remain in the United States until February 2007. lnl 12007, he was apprehended by immigration officials and placed into removal proceedings. lnl 12008, he failed to appear at his removal hearing, and the Immigration Judge ordered him…
SEP142022_03B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
The Petitioner entered the United States as an F-1 nonimmigrant student to study for a master of fine arts degree in animation atl I College of Art and Design. After completing that degree, he changed to H-1B nonimmigrant status in 2015 to work as creative manager for his design company. In 2022, he changed hisnonimmigrant status to H-4, dependent of anH-1…
SEP142022_03C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
The Petitioner was born orl I 1997. On I I 2018, when the Petitioner was 20 years old and one day before she turned 21 years old, the Family Court inl I New York (Family Court) issued an order entitled ORDER-Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJ order). The SIJ order provided, in pertinent part, that the Petitioner "is dependent upon the Family Court, or h…
SEP142022_03H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
The issue presented on appeal is whether the Applicant is eligible to obtain permission to reapply for admission to the United States. The record reflects that inl I 2006, the Applicant was expeditiously removed pursuant to section 235(b)(1) of the Act after attempting to enter the United States without inspection. The Applicant indicated on her Form 1-212…
SEP142022_03H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
The Director determined that the Applicant was inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act because he previously sought admission to the United States with a fraudulently obtained passport and U.S. nonimmigrant visa. The Applicant does not contest this determination, and it is supported by the record. 1 The issue on appeal is whether the Applicant…
SEP142022_04C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History In 2018, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Superior Court of California, (Family Court) issued an order appointing T-Q-T-,2, the Petitioner's uncle, as his guardian in guardianship proceedings brought under sections 1510 and 1514 of the California Probate Code. The order stated that "extension of the guard…
SEP142022_04H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
The Director found the Applicant, a citizen of Mali, inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud or misrepresentation. Specifically, the Applicant entered the United States in 2001 with a fraudulent passport. The Applicant does not contest the finding of inadmissibility on appeal. The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has establ…
SEP142022_05C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In I 2018, when the Petitioner was 18 years old, the Iowa District Court "in and for" Iowa (District Court) issued an ORDER DECLARING LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP AND FINDINGS REGARDING ELIGIBILITY FOR SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE STATUS ( court order). In the court order, the District Court found that it had jurisdiction under…
SEP142022_06C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 14, 2022
—
In our prior decision, incorporated here by reference, we noted that a circuit court in I I Florida ( circuit court) entered an order ( order) granting temporary custody of the Petitioner to aunt in 2017 when the Petitioner was 17 years old. In dismissing the Petitioner's appeal, we determined that the Petitioner did not establish that her request for SIJ c…
SEP132022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 13, 2022
—
Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has received a major, internationally recognized award, he must satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). In denying the petition, the Director determined that the Petitioner fulfilled only one of the initial evidentiary criteria, participatio…