Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 5076–5100 of 7923 (page 204 / 317)
JUL222022_03D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 22, 2022
—
A. Factual and Procedural History The Petitioner, a citizen of El Salvador, filed her U petition in November 2015 based on physical and psychological abuse perpetrated by her ex-partner, J-O-F-.1 With her U petition, the Petitioner submitted a Supplement B from September 2015 signed and certified by a district court judge with the I kMinnesota) District Cou…
JUL222022_04D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 22, 2022
—
A. The Petitioner Was Not the Victim of Qualifying Criminal Activity 1. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition with a Supplement B signed and certified by the ____ Sheriff's Office ( certifying official), based upon al 12011 incident whereby he was robbed. In response to Part 3.1 of the Supplement B, which provides chec…
JUL212022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 21, 2022
—
The Applicant was granted U nonimmigrant status in November of 2016. He filed the instant adjustment application in March of 2020 with an affidavit apologizing "for breaking the law and entering the United States illegally and for all my driving violations and DWIS," attesting that he was"going to classes for the DWis . . . ." He submitted, among other thin…
JUL212022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 21, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a citizen of Nigeria, married L-L-, 1 a U.S. citizen, inl I 2013 and filed the current VA WA petition in March 2016. The Director denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish that he had a qualifying relationship with his U.S. citizen spouse, entered into marriage in good faith,jointly resided with L-L-, or was subje…
JUL212022_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 21, 2022
—
The Applicant has satisfied the conditions in section 320(a)(l) of the Act, as he was born outside the United States in Ghana in 2009 and his mother's 2020 Certificate of Naturalization shows that he has a parent who is a U.S. citizen through naturalization. The Applicant also meets the definition of a child under the relevant section 101 ( c )(1) of the Ac…
JUL212022_01E3343
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 21, 2022
—
In the record before the Director, the Applicant claimed that she was born in Ecuador onl 17, 1937, rather than on thel 9, 1938 date of birth printed on her Certificate of Naturalization. According to the Applicant, the individual who prepared her Form N-400 had included an incorrect date of birth even though the Applicant claims she had given the preparer…
JUL212022_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 21, 2022
—
The Applicant filed his application for permission to reapply in September 2020. He provided in part 2, section 5.a that he was removed from the United States under section 240 of the Act or any other provision of the law, or he departed the United States while an order of removal was outstanding. The Applicant did not list the date he was removed or the lo…
JUL212022_01H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 21, 2022
—
The Applicant was admitted to the United States on September 13, 2000, by presenting a passport and F-1 student nonimmigrant visa in another name. Therefore, the Director correctly found him
inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act due to fraud or misrepresentation.1 The Applicant does not contest the Director's inadmissibility finding on appe…
JUL212022_02D9101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 21, 2022
—
According to pages 4-5 of the petition, the Petitioner seeks to hire the Beneficiary as a jockey, intending to compensate him with $40,000 a year in wages. The employment contract in the record indicates that the "Proposed Salary Offered" is "$40,000 per year (depending upon the number of races)." The Petitioner has not established eligibility to classify t…
JUL212022_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 21, 2022
—
The Applicant does not contest the finding of inadmissibility for fraud or misrepresentation, a determination supported by the record .1 Instead, the issue on appeal is whether the Applicant's qualifying relative wou Id experience extreme hardship if the waiver were denied. We have considered all the evidence in the record and conclude that it does not esta…
JUL202022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 20, 2022
—
The Petitioner studied at I College of Music and I I College I Since 2014 he ked for I, a company owned by composer Many of the Petitioner's documented projects in the record have heen as an assistant t Some of their projects are the I _____ an 1 His most recent work includes composing the score for the feature film and the television series! I
A. Evidenti…
JUL202022_01B5203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 20, 2022
—
Upon review, we will remand the matter to the Director to determine whether the Petitioner has demon strated that the Beneficiary qualifies for the EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional, and whether she meets the specific requirements of the labor certification. 2 1 The priority date of the petition is the date the underlying labor certific…
JUL202022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 20, 2022
—
The Director determined that substantial and probative evidence in the record demonstrated that the Petitioner entered into a prior marriage for the purpose of evading immigration laws, approval of Form I-360 was prohibited under INA 204( c ), and there was good and sufficient cause to revoke the prior approval. On appeal, the Petitioner argues, through cou…
JUL192022_01B6203
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 19, 2022
—
Both the Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, Part 6, item 8 and the ETA Form 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification, Part G, item 1 indicated that the Beneficiary's annual wage would be $42,453.00 per year.1 In denying the petition, the Director stated that "[t]he Petitioner provided a copy of their 2020 IRS Form 1120-S .... O…
JUL192022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 19, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Grenada, was placed into removal proceedings in 2010. He married his U.S. citizen spouse, H-B-, 1 in 12015 while he was in removal proceedings. The Petitioner subsequently filed his VA WA petition in August 201 7. The Director determined the Petitioner had not met his burden of establishing by clear and convincing evi…
JUL192022_01D9101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 19, 2022
—
According to page 4 of the petition, the Petitioner seeks to have the Beneficiary work as a "middle and long distance runner." The record includes an unsigned agreement between the Petitioner and the Beneficiary, indicating that the Petitioner "agrees to file [ a Form] I-129 for [the B]eneficiary," and the Beneficiary "agrees to following the competition an…
JUL192022_01H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 19, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant entered the United States without inspection in May 2000, he applied for asylum in April 2008, and he was referred to an immigration judge for ad"udication of his asylum application in June 2008. After being placed in removal proceedings in 2008, the immigration judge denied the Applicant's asylum application, he was o…
JUL192022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 19, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was found inadmissible under section 212( a)( 6)( C)(i) of the Act, for fraud or willful misrepresentation. The Applicant does not contest inadmissibility on appeal. Thus, the Applicant must seek a waiver of this inadmissibility. The issues on appeal therefore are whether the Applicant has established extreme h…
JUL192022_02B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 19, 2022
—
To be eligible for professional classification, the labor certification must require, at a minimum, a U.S. bachelor's degree or a foreign equivalent degree. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(1)(3)(i). For the reasons discussed below, we agree with the Director that the labor certification does not support the requested classification. 2 In order to determine what a job…
JUL192022_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 19, 2022
—
In September 2019, the Petitioner, a native and citizen of the Bahamas, filed this VA WA petition based uponhiS 12017 marriage to his U.S. citizen spouse, R-L-H-.2 In November2021,upon review of evidence submitted both with the VA WA petition and in response to requests for evidence (RFE) and a notice of intent to deny (NOID), the Director denied this petit…
JUL192022_02H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 19, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant was ordered deported in absentia onl 1996, and he has remained in the United States since then. As such, the Applicant would become inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act upon departure from the United States. The Applicant does not contest this finding. The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant, u…
JUL192022_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 19, 2022
—
The Director's decision summarizes the facts surrounding the Applicant's inadmissibility, which we incorporate here and which the Applicant does not contest on appeal. Briefly, the record shows that the Applicant entered the United States in 2005 using a fraudulent passport and visa. In 2006, an Immigration Judge ordered the Applicant removed, a decision up…
JUL192022_03B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 19, 2022
—
A. Background and Procedural History The Petitioner is a native and citizen of Costa Rica who last entered the United States as a temporary agricultural worker in April 2006. Inl 12017, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) initiated removal proceedings against the Petitioner, serving him with a notice to appear. A marriage certificate in the record sho…
JUL192022_04B6203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 19, 2022
—
Upon review of the record in its totality, we conclude the Director did not sufficiently explain the specific reasons for the revocation as required under 8 C.F.R. § 205.2(c) and the Director made incorrect statements. For example, the Director misconstrues the content of the question at section C.9 of the labor certification, and erroneously concludes that…
JUL192022_06B6203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 19, 2022
—
With respect to the basis for the Director's decision, the Petitioner's assertions on appeal are persuasive. The Petitioner must prove eligibility by a preponderance of evidence, such that the applicant's claim is "probably true" based on the factual circumstances of each individual case. Matter of Chawathe; Matter of E-M-. We find that the Petitioner has m…