Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 5601–5625 of 7923 (page 225 / 317)
APR202022_02D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 20, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed his U petition in July 2015 with a Supplement B signed and ce1iified by a first assistant at the District Attorney's Office in ____ Texas (certifying official). The certifying official checked the boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to "Conspiracy to commit any of the named crime…
APR202022_02H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 20, 2022
—
The Applicant entered the United States in February 1994 , through the visa waiver program (VWP), and was authorized to remain in the United States until May 1994. See Section 217 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1187. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued an order of removal against
the Applicant for being a VWP overstay, pursuant to Section 217…
APR202022_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 20, 2022
—
In our prior decision dismissing the Applicant's appeal, incorporatedhere by reference, we determined that he had not established that his continued presence in the United States was justified on humanitarian grounds, to ensure family unity, or was otherwise in the public interest, as required by section 245(m)(l )(B) of the Act, because his criminal histor…
APR202022_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Dismissed
Apr 20, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed his U petition with a Supplement B, in which the certifying official checked the box at part 3 .1 indicating that the Petitioner is the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to"Other-Burglary x2/G. Larceny." Regarding the statutory citations for the criminal activity being investigated or prosecuted, the certifying agency lis…
APR202022_03H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 20, 2022
—
The Applicant entered the United States in February 1994, through the visa waiver program (VWP), and was authorized to remain in the United States until May 1994. See Section 217 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1187. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued an order ofremoval against the Applicant for being a VWP overstay, pursuant to Section 217 of…
APR202022_04H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Dismissed
Apr 20, 2022
—
The Applicant entered the United States without admission in February 2006, and was ordered removed in 2007, but there is no indication that she has ever departed the United States since her initial entry. Upon departure from the United States, she will become inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act. The Director denied the application, stati…
APR202022_05H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 20, 2022
—
The record reflects that in 2003, when the Applicant was 16 years old, she entered the United States without being inspected, admitted, or paroled, and was apprehended by U.S. border patrol agents who issued her a Form I-862, Notice to Appear (NTA) before an Immigration Judge in I Texas onl 2004.2 The Applicant did not appear for the scheduled court hearing…
APR202022_06H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Dismissed
Apr 20, 2022
—
In this case, the Applicant has not shown that she is inadmissible under Section 212(a)(9)(A) of the Act, because she has not been ordered removed. Rather, the Applicant acknowledges, and the record shows, that she is currently in removal proceedings under Section240 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § § 1229a.2 Page 3 of her Form I-212 application indicates that she ha…
APR202022_07H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Dismissed
Apr 20, 2022
—
The Applicant is currently in the United States and seeks conditional pennission to reapply for admission pursuant to the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(i) before he departs.1 He does not contest that he will be inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act upon departure for having been previously ordered removed. The only issue on appeal is wheth…
APR202022_08H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 20, 2022
—
As noted, the Applicant is currently in the United States and seeks permission to reapply for admission pursuant to the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(j) before departing the United States. Because he has an outstanding order ofremoval, he will be inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act once he departs. 1 In denying the application, the Direc…
APR202022_11H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Dismissed
Apr 20, 2022
—
The record indicates that the Applicant will become inadmissible upon departing the United States pursuant to section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act for having been previously ordered removed. The issue raised on appeal is whether the Applicant should be granted conditional approval of his Form 1-212 in the exercise of discretion. The Applicant entered the Uni…
APR202022_13H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 20, 2022
—
The Applicant currently resides in the United States and he is seeking conditional approval of his application under the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(j) before departing the United States to apply for an immigrant visa. 1 He does not contest that he will become inadmissible under section 212( a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act upon departure for having been previous…
APR202022_14H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 20, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant first entered the United States on or about June 19, 1999, at or near !Arizona, without inspection. Inl I 2014, the Applicant was placed in removal proceedings for being in the United States without admission or parole and having no valid immigrant visa. In 2016, the Applicant was granted voluntary departure. He subseq…
APR202022_15H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Dismissed
Apr 20, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant first entered the United States in 2000, at or near an unknown port of entry, without inspection. Inl I 2016, the Applicant was placed in removal proceedings for being in the United States without admission or parole and was granted voluntary departure on I 2018. The Applicant was granted until 2018, to voluntarily dep…
APR192022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Dismissed
Apr 19, 2022
—
The Applicant is a native and citizen of Guatemala. His parent filed a derivative U petition on his behalf, and USCIS approved the petition indicating that petition's validity dates spanned from March 29, 2017, to March 28, 2021 . The Applicant was in Guatemala at the time his U petition was approved, and he subsequently obtained a U visa through consular p…
APR192022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Dismissed
Apr 19, 2022
—
The Petitioner asserts on motion to reconsider that we "applied the wrong analogy to the applicable case law and wrong standard of proof to the case by concluding that the [P]etitioner did not establish that the proposed endeavor has national importance." Generally, the Petitioner selects passages from
our prior appeal decision and asserts that our precede…
APR192022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 19, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Nigeria, married her U.S. citizen spouse, D-R-, 1 in __ 2014. She filed her VA WA petition in March 2019. In support of her VA WA petition, the Petitioner 1 We use initials to protect identities.
submitted a personal affidavit, third-party statements of support, financial and insurance records, apartment rental docum…
APR192022_01D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Dismissed
Apr 19, 2022
—
The Applicant, a 23-year-old native and citizen of Guatemala, entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in April 2016 when he was 1 7 years old. The Applicant filed his T application in January 2019 on the basis that he was the victim of child sex and labor trafficking by individuals who, shortly after he and others illegally entere…
APR192022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Dismissed
Apr 19, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole with his mother on or around 1992, when he was 16 years old. He returned to Mexico on or around 1996, when he was 20 years old. He reentered the United States in 2001 without inspection, admission, or parole and has remained in the country since that t…
APR192022_01D6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 19, 2022
—
Upon review of the record in its totality and for the reasons set out below, we conclude that the Petitioner has not met the statutory and regulatory requirements for classifying the Beneficiary as a
K-1 nonimmigrant. Specifically, the record does not establish the Petitioner and Beneficiary met in person within the two-year period preceding the filing of…
APR192022_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Dismissed
Apr 19, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant was born in Mexico inl 1987. In September 1998, at the age of 10, she was adopted in Kansas by her U.S. citizen father. In August 2008, at the age of 20, she was granted lawful permanent resident status. The Applicant filed the instant Form N-600 indicating that she derived U.S. citizenship from her adoptive father. We…
APR192022_01F1101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 19, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed the instant orphan petition on behalf of the Beneficiary, a citizen of Nigeria, in May 2019. The Petitioner claimed that the Beneficiary met the definition of an orphan as the child who "has no parents due to ... abandonment or desertion by ... both parents." With the orphan petition, the Petitio…
APR192022_01G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 19, 2022
—
A. The Co-Obligor Received Notice of the Time and Place to Deliver the Foreign National
The first issue on appeal is whether the Obligor received notice of when and where to deliver the bonded foreign national. The ICE Field Office determined that the Obligor breached a delivery bond, as the foreign national was not delivered upon request. The regulation a…
APR192022_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 19, 2022
—
The record shows that the Applicant entered the United States without inspection on or about I 1996. He was apprehended and placed into removal proceedings but failed to appear for a scheduled hearing and was ordered removed in absentia on I 1997. See section 240(b )( 5)(A) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b )(5)(A) (stating that any individual who does not att…
APR192022_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Accepted
Apr 19, 2022
—
The Applicant was granted U-1 status from October 2013 through September 201 7. He timely filed his U adjustment application in December 2016, which the Director denied in July 2020 determining that the positive and mitigating equities in the Applicant's case were outweighed by the adverse factors. As a result, the Director concluded the Applicant did not e…