Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 5751–5775 of 7923 (page 231 / 317)
MAR242022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 24, 2022
—
In our prior decision dismissing the Applicant's appeal, incorporatedhere by reference, we determined that he had not established that his continued presence in the United States was justified on humanitarian grounds, to ensure family unity, or was otherwise in the public interest, as required by section 245(m)(l )(B) of the Act, because his criminal histor…
MAR242022_01B5203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 24, 2022
—
For the reasons discussed below, we withdraw the Director's conclusions that the Petitioner has established that 1) he is an advanced degree professional and 2) his proposed endeavor meets prong one under the Dhanasar analysis. A. Eligibility for the Requested Classification As stated above, the first step to establishing eligibility for a national interest…
MAR242022_01D8101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 24, 2022
—
A. Procedural History
In denying the petition, the Director determined that the Petitioner did not claim the Beneficiary met the evidentiary criterion at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(o)(3)(v)(A), and she further found that although the Petitioner provided evidence relating to five alternative regulatory criteria, 8 C.F.R. § 214.2( o )(3 )(v)(B)(l), (2), (3), (5), and (…
MAR232022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 23, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and c1t1zen of Mexico, entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole on or around October 2000. In October 2015, USCIS granted the Applicant U nonimmigrant status, based on a felonious assault he suffered in 2011. The Applicant timely filed the instant U adjustment application in December 2018 while in U status.…
MAR232022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 23, 2022
—
The Petitioner has competed in I I events for many years, and has placed in competitions at the regional, national, and international level. He has also acted as a trainer, primarily for local police departments. He states that he intends to continue to compete in sports events in the United States, as well as open a I academy to train others in the sport.…
MAR232022_01B3203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 23, 2022
—
As mentioned in our appellate decision, which we incorporate here, the Beneficiary received her Ph.D. in Biological and Biomedical Science froml !University in May 2015. From November 2015 until April 2018, she served as a Research and Development Scientist for The Beneficiary has been employed as a Principal Research Scientist with the Petitioner since Apr…
MAR232022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 23, 2022
—
Because he has not indicated or established that he qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, the Petitioner must meet at least three of the regulatory criteria for classification as an individual of exceptional ability. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A)-(F). In denying the petition, the Director determined that the Petitioner did…
MAR232022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 23, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History Inl I 2018, when the Petitioner, a native and citizen of El Salvador, was 17 years old, the District Court for the I Judicial District in I Texas (District Court), issued an Order of Dependency and Findings (SIJ order). The District Court noted its authority to issue declaratory judgments under sections "37.002(b)(c)…
MAR232022_01D8101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 23, 2022
—
The issue before us is whether the Petitioner has established that our decision to dismiss its appeal was based on an incorrect application of law or USCIS policy and/or has presented new facts to warrant reopening its appeal. The Petitioner must specify the factual and legal issues raised on appeal that were decided in error or overlooked in our initial de…
MAR232022_01H2212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 23, 2022
—
The issue presented on appeal is whether the Applicant should be granted a waiver of inadmissibility in the exercise of discretion. The Applicant does not contest that he is inadmissible pursuant to sections 212(a)(9)(B)(i), for unlawful presence,and 212(a)(2)(A) of the Act, for having been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude. Rather the Applican…
MAR232022_01H6212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 23, 2022
—
The issue presented on appeal is whether the Applicant should be granted a waiver of inadmissibility in the exercise of discretion. The Applicant does not contest that he is inadmissible pursuant to sections 212(a)(9)(B)(i), for unlawful presence,and 212(a)(2)(A) of the Act, for having been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude. Rather the Applican…
MAR222022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 22, 2022
—
The Applicant, a citizen of Mexico, was approved for U-1 nonimmigrant status from October 2014 until September 2018. In July 2018, he filed the instant U adjustment application. Through a request for evidence (RFE), the Director informed the Applicant that the record did not contain copies of all pages of his passport, as required, or a Form 1-693, Report o…
MAR222022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 22, 2022
—
A. Evidentiary Criteria
Because the Petitioner has not claimed or established that he has received a major, internationally recognized award, he must satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). The Director determined that the Petitioner met three of the claimed evidentiary criteria relating to judging at 8…
MAR222022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 22, 2022
—
A. Exceptional Ability
The Petitioner asserts that he meets at least three of the regulatory criteria for classification as an individual of exceptional ability. In denying the petition, the Director determined that the Petitioner fulfilled only the academic record criterion at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A). Upon review of the arguments and evidence present…
MAR222022_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 22, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of the Philippines, last entered the United States in 2007 on an H-2B visa as a temporary non-agricultural worker. In September 2018 , the Applicant filed a T application on the basis that he was a victim of labor trafficking through the use of fraud for the
purpose of subjection to involuntary servitude and debt bondage…
MAR222022_01D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 22, 2022
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in April 2016 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a detective in the Police Department in !California (certifying official). The certifying official checked a box indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of felonious assault and criminal activity involving or simila…
MAR222022_01D6101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 22, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed this fiancee petition in March 2020. On his Form I-129F, he indicated that he and his fiancee had not met in person during the two years immediately before filing this petition. He also provided a personal statement requesting an extreme hardship exemption to the two-year personal meeting requirement because of his health-related concer…
MAR222022_01E3343
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 22, 2022
—
In the record before the Director, the Applicant claimed that she was born in China on ___ 1992, but her original birth certificate erroneously listed her date of birth as I I 1988. The Applicant provided a new copy of a Chinese birth certificate reflecting that her year of birth is 1992, and a newly-issued driver's license with an amended date of birth. Th…
MAR222022_02A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 22, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and c1t1zen of Mexico, entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in 1989. The Applicant was granted U nonimmigrant status from October 2014 until September 2018, and timely filed the instant U adjustment application in August 2018. The Director denied the U adjustment application, determining that the Applica…
MAR222022_02D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 22, 2022
—
The Applicant is a citizen of Peru who last entered the United States in 1996. He filed his T application in June 2018 . He alleged that he had a difficult childhood in Peru and he and his mother were kidnapped by members of the I lwhen he was 15 years old. He stated that in 1993, at the age of 18, he entered the United States with an H-2A visa to work as a…
MAR222022_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 22, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico , was granted U-3 nonimmigrant status as the child of a victim of qualifying criminal activity from October 2014 to September 2018 , and timely filed his U adjustment application in October 2017 . The Director denied the application, concluding that the Applicant's positive and mitigating equities were outweighe…
MAR222022_04A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 22, 2022
—
In this case, the Applicant filed a Form 1-918, Petition for U Non immigrant Status (U petition), in February of 2014 which was approved in April of 201 7, with validity dates from April 2 7, 201 7, to April 26, 2021.1 Through counsel, the Applicant, who was living in Texas, filed his adjustment application with the Vermont Service Center on April 23, 2021.…
MAR212022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 21, 2022
—
The Applicant is a 27-year-old citizen of Mexico. In November 2014, the Director granted the Applicant U nonimmigrant approval from October 1, 2014, through September 30, 2018, based on her victimization and assistance to law enforcement. The Applicant filed her U adjustment application in August 2018. In February 2020, the Director denied the Applicant's U…
MAR212022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 21, 2022
—
The Petitioner is a native and citizen of Togo who entered the United States in December 1996 as an F-1 student. In 2008 she married a U.S. citizen, R-S-, 1 with whom she claimed to have resided from 2008 until November 2016, and she filed her VAWA petition in March 2019. With her petition she submitted a personal affidavit, a letter from a clinical social…
MAR212022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 21, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in July 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified in April 2015 by an Assistant Chief in the Criminal Investigations Command of thel I Police Department in I I Texas ( certifying official). At part 3.1 of the Supplement B, the certifying official checked a box indicating that t…