Search cases

Compare defaults: v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52 vs v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Reset

Results

Showing 5801–5825 of 7923 (page 233 / 317)
MAR162022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 16, 2022 The Petitioner has been employed within the sound design and editing field by ___ I I since 2009 . Because the Petitioner has not indicated or demonstrated that he has received a major, internationally recognized award at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3), he must satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). In denying…
MAR162022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 16, 2022 The Petitioner acknowledged that she entered the United States without inspection in 1990 and was present in the United States without being inspected or admitted. The Petitioner also submitted evidence indicating that she was arrested several times in California between 1995 and 2007 , including for assault with a deadly weapon and with force likely to pro…
MAR162022_01G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 16, 2022 The Obligor does not contest their failure to deliver the Noncitizen on the requested date. Instead, they state that they did not violate the terms of the bond because they did not receive notice of when and where to deliver the Noncitizen. The first issue on appeal is whether ICE properly served the notice. The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.8(c) states that…
MAR162022_02B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 16, 2022 As noted above, in our most recent decision in this matter, we dismissed the Petitioner's motion to reconsider because it was not timely filed. While we acknowledged that USCIS issued guidance that allows for acceptance of Form I-290B within 60 calendar days of the unfavorable decision, due to processing and mailing delays resulting from the COVI-19 pandemi…
MAR162022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 16, 2022 A. The Petitioner Was Not the Victim of Qualifying Criminal Activity 1. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in June 2016 with a Supplement B signed and certified by the director of the Office of Immigrant Affairs at the District Attorney's Office ( certifying official). The certifying official checked a box to indica…
MAR152022_01A3013
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 15, 2022 The issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has established his inability, because of compelling reasons, to return to I The record reflects that the Applicant was admitted to the United States in A-1 nonimmigrant status on September 9, 2010, to work for the I I consulate in I I initially as the commercial attache and then as the vice consul. The Applicant…
MAR152022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 15, 2022 The Petitioner is an executive producer in the entertainment industry whose body of work includes production and director of photography credits on commercial, television and film projects. At the time of filing, he was scheduled to work on upcoming television projects for I and I The Director determined that record did not support the Petitioner's claim t…
MAR152022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 15, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2018, when the Petitioner was 16 years old, the District Court for thtC7 Judicial District in ____ Texas issued an Order in Suit Affecting Parent-Child Relationship (SAPCR order). In its order, the District Court determined, among other findings necessary for SIJ eligibility under section 101(a)(27)(J) of the Act,…
MAR152022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 15, 2022 The record reflects that in 2014, the Petitioner's 18-year-old son was shot in the leg as he was leaving his friend's home. Medical documentation in the record describes the Petitioner's son's injuries as an avulsion/laceration and a deep abrasion, both located on his right shin, and the treatment indicated as a cleaning of the wound with soap and water, pl…
MAR152022_01D6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 15, 2022 The issue on appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to demonstrate the Beneficiary's bona fide intent to marry the Petitioner. When adjudicating the underlying case, the Director requested evidence of this bona fide intent. Suggested evidence included statements of intent to marry signed by both the Petitioner and the Beneficiary as well as documentat…
MAR152022_02B2203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 15, 2022 The Petitioner is an associate professor in the department of anatomy at the I I University of I I and at the time of filing was a visiting professor at the University I I He received a Doctor of Philosophy degree in medical science in 2011, and indicates that he intends to continue his work in the application of cross reality and other technologies to the…
MAR152022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 15, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner, a 46-year-old native and citizen of Mexico, filed the instant U petition in September 2015 with a Form 1-918 Supplement B, U Nonirnmigrant Status Certification (Supplement B) signed and certified by the Lieutenant of the Youth and Family Services Division with the Police Department inl I California. T…
MAR152022_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 15, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in February 2016, accompanied by a Supplement B that was signed and certified by the Chief Deputy District Attorney of the I District Attorney's Office in I !California (certifying official) in November 2015, based on criminal activity committed against the Petitioner in 2013. In p…
MAR142022_01B5203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 14, 2022 A. Eligibility for the Requested Classification As stated above, the first step to establishing eligibility for a national interest waiver is demonstrating qualification for the underlying EB-2 visa classification, as either an advanced degree professional or an individual of exceptional ability. For the reasons discussed below, we withdraw the Director's c…
MAR142022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 14, 2022 The Petitioner married his U.S. citizen spouse, R-B-F-, 1 in 2016. The Petitioner filed his VAWA petition in June 2017. The Director denied the petition concluding the Petitioner had not met his burden of establishing he entered into marriage with R-B-F- in good faith. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that considering the context of domestic violence, he s…
MAR142022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 14, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2018, when the Petitioner was 16 years old, the District Court for the JJudicial District in _____ Texas, issued a Final Order for Declaratory Judgment (declaratory judgment) in which it found that the Petitioner is "dependent upon this Court in accordance with the law of the State of Texas." The District Court al…
MAR142022_01D2101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 14, 2022 A. Motion to Reopen On motion, the Petitioner submits a brief and affidavits from the Petitioner and the Beneficiary. The Petitioner states on appeal that we should review all evidence, including evidence submitted in prior motions to reopen and reconsider, to provide the Petitioner with a fair opportunity to present evidence and legal arguments. By regulat…
MAR142022_01D6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 14, 2022 The issue on appeal is whether the Petitioner warrants a favorable exercise in discretion to waive the two year in-person meeting requirement due to extreme hardship. The Director denied the petition, deciding that the Petitioner neither met the two year in-person meeting requirement nor warranted a favorable exercise in discretion to waive that requirement…
MAR142022_01G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 14, 2022 A. The Co-Obligor Received Notice of the Time and Place to Deliver the Foreign National The first issue on appeal is whether the Obligor received notice of when and where to deliver the bonded foreign national. The ICE Field Office determined that the Obligor breached a delivery bond, as the foreign national was not delivered upon request. The regulation a…
MAR132022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 13, 2022 As stated above, the first step to establishing eligibility for a national interest waiver is demonstrating qualification for the underlying EB-2 visa classification, as either an advanced degree professional or an individual of exceptional ability. For the following reasons, the Petitioner has not demonstrated his eligibility for the EB-2 classification. 4…
MAR112022_01B2203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 11, 2022 The record indicates that the Beneficiary received a Master of Business Management from the I _ (Philippines) in 1998 and holds the designation of Chartered Financial Analyst. The Petitioner has employed the Beneficiary since 2008, most recently in the position of Fund Manager Lead. Because the Petitioner has not claimed or established that the Beneficiary…
MAR112022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 11, 2022 The Petitioner married his U.S . citizen spouse, V-A-B-, 1 inl 12016 and filed a VAWA petition based on this marriage in July 2018. The Director denied the petition, concluding the Petitioner had not demonstrated he entered into marriage with V-A-B- in good faith. 1 Initials are used to protect the privacy of this individual. On appeal, the Petitioner asse…
MAR102022_01A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 10, 2022 The Applicant, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic, was granted U-3 status in December 2014. Since he was outside the United States, the Applicant applied for a U nonimmigrant visa, and was admitted to the United States as a U-3 nonimmigrant in May 2016 . His U-3 nonimmigrant status was valid until December 2019. His U-3 status was subsequently e…
MAR102022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 10, 2022 At initial filing, the Petitioner claimed eligibility under seven categories of evidence: awards under 8 C.F.R. § 204 .5(h)(3)(i), published material under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iii),judgingunder 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv), original contributions of major significance under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(v), display under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(vii), leading or cr…
MAR102022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 10, 2022 The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. Although the Director found that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit, the Director concluded that the record does not establish that the Petitioner's endeavor has national importance. The Director also concluded the record did not satisfy the…
Prev Page 233 / 317 Next