Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 5851–5875 of 7923 (page 235 / 317)
MAR082022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2022
—
We address the combined motion separately below. We noted on appeal that the record does not contain a statement from the Applicant's qualifying relative spouse that indicates whether he intends to remain in the United States or relocate to Canada if the Applicant's waiver application is denied. Again, on combined motion, the record contains no such stateme…
MAR082022_01H7212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2022
—
The issue on appeal is whether the Applicant is eligible for a waiver under section 212(d)(l2) of the Act due to being the subject of a final order for a violation of section 274C of the Act. The record reflects that onl 12020, a chief administrative law judge from the Executive Office for Immigration Review , Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Offi…
MAR082022_02B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2022
—
The Petitioner claims that e began officiating cricket in India in 2000 and d has been a member of the umpiring committee at the - inl North Carolina since 2012.1 Because the Petitioner has not indicated or demonstrated that he has received a major, internationally recognized award at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3), he must satisfy at least three of the alternate r…
MAR082022_02C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2022
—
In our prior decision, incorporated here by reference, we determined the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, had not demonstrated he merits USCIS' consent to SIJ classification as the record did not contain a reasonable factual basis for the juvenile court's requisite SIJ determinations. Specifically, we concluded the record lacked a reasonable f…
MAR082022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in October 2015 relating to criminal activity that occurred in 2015. With the petition he submitted a Supplement B, police and court records, personal affidavits, and a mental health evaluation. The Supplement B, ce1iified by the I I Indiana, Prosecutor's Office, indicates at Part…
MAR082022_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2022
—
The Applicant does not contest her inadmissibility, as described in the Director's decision, which we incorporate here. Therefore, the sole issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has established that her spouse would suffer extreme hardship upon separation. The Applicant's spouse states that he relies on the Applicant for financial and emotional support a…
MAR082022_03D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 08, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in March 2016 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a lieutenant in thel I Police Department itj I Arkansas ( certifying official). On part 3.1 of the Supplement B, the certifying official checked a box indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involv…
MAR072022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2022
—
The Applicant is a 25-year-old citizen of Mexico. In October 2014, the Director granted the Applicant derivative U nonimmigrant approval based on his family member's victimization and assistance to law enforcement. The Applicant entered the United States with valid derivative U nonimmigrant visa in September 2015; he was granted authorized stay until Septem…
MAR072022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2022
—
The Petitioner is a soccer athlete and youth soccer coach who states that he intends to work in this area in the United States. 1 He holds educational and coaching credentials from the United Kingdom and United States, and has worked as a youth soccer coach in both countries. The Petitioner asserts on appeal that he applied for classification in the E21 cat…
MAR072022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed his U petition in August of 2015 and the Director denied the petition in June of 2020 , concluding that he did not establish his admissibility to the United States. In a separate decision issued on the same day, the Director also denied the Petitioner's corresponding Form 1-192, Application for Advance Permission to Enter as Nonimmigran…
MAR072022_01D2101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2022
—
The Petitioner stated that the Beneficiary will be employed as a "QA lead" and that the position requires a minimum of a bachelor's degree in computer science, computer engineering, electrical engineering, or a related field or its equivalent. The Petitioner initially provided a list of duties, which was updated with more detail with their request for evide…
MAR072022_01F1101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed the instant orphan petition on behalf of the Beneficiary, a citizen of Nigeria, in June 2019. The Petitioner claimed that the Beneficiary met the definition of an orphan as the child who "has no parents due to ... abandonment ... by ... both parents." The Director approved the orphan petition in…
MAR072022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2022
—
The Applicant does not contest his inadmissibility for fraud and misrepresentation. Instead, he seeks a waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(i) of the Act, stating that his wife will suffer extreme hardship if his application is denied. An applicant may show extreme hardship in two scenarios: 1) if the qualifying relative remains in the United States…
MAR072022_02A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, was granted U nonimmigrant status from March 2017 to March 2021. She filed the instant U adjustment application in May 2020. The Director issued a request for evidence (RFE), seeking a complete copy of the Applicant's Nicaraguan passport valid from February 2012 to February 2022, a copy of her Nicaraguan bir…
MAR072022_02B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2022
—
The record shows that the Petitioner has been employed since 2015 as the chief executive officer and owner of a commercial and residential cleaning service, Louisiana. The Petitioner received a bachelor's degree in management from ____ University! in 2018 . Becau se the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has received a major, internationall…
MAR072022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed their U petition in December of 2015 accompanied by a Supplement B certified by A-L-M-, who was listed as "Police Officer" of thel I Police Department inl I Ohio.1 The Director issued a request for evidence (RFE), in part seeking evidence that A-L-M- was the head of the certifying agency or a person in a supervisory role that was specif…
MAR072022_02F1101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed the instant orphan petition on behalf of the Beneficiary, a citizen of Nigeria, in June 2019. The Petitioner claimed that the Beneficiary met the definition of an orphan as the child who "has no parents due to ... abandonment ... by ... both parents." The Director approved the orphan petition in…
MAR072022_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Brazil, last entered the United States as a visitor in 2000. USCIS granted the Applicant U nonimmigrant status as the victim of qualifying criminal activity in November 2015. The Applicant timely filed the instant U adjustment application in September 2019. The Director denied the application, concluding that the Appli…
MAR072022_04D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 07, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in October 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified in April 2015 by the Director of Immigrant Affairs for the I I New York District Attorney's Office ( certifying official). The certifying official indicated the event forming the basis for the U petition occurred in March 201…
MAR052022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 05, 2022
—
The Petitioner is a photographer who has displayed his work at exhibits in Venezuela, France, and the United States. He states that he wishes to continue to work as a photographer in the United States, and intends to operate a photo consulting business in Florida.
A. Evidentiary Criteria
Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has r…
MAR042022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 04, 2022
—
The Applicant's daughter filed a Form 1-918 Supplement A, Petition for Qualifying Member of U-1 Non immigrant, on the Applicant's behalf, which USCIS approved, according her derivative U-4 nonimmigrant status from October 2014 to September 2018. In May 2018, she filed the instant U adjustment application. The Director denied the Applicant's U adjustment app…
MAR042022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 04, 2022
—
In I 2019, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Probate and Family Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Family Court) issued a Decree of Special Findings of Fact and Rulings of Law (SIJ order), making SU-related determinations for the Petitioner. The Family Court declared the Petitioner dependent on the Family Court in accordance with "M.G.L. c.…
MAR042022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 04, 2022
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in March 2016 based on an incident that occurred in 2006. With her U petition, she provided a Supplement B signed and certified in September 2016 by the Chief of Police of thel I Police Department in I Minnesota ( certifying official). In part 3.1 of the Supplement B, the certif…
MAR042022_01D15245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 04, 2022
—
After the Petitioner was granted U nonimmigrant status, she filed the instant U immigrant petition on behalf of the Derivative in April 2018. The Director denied the U immigrant petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not meet her burden of demonstrating that the Derivative warranted a favorable exercise of discretion. The Director acknowledged and con…
MAR042022_01F1101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Mar 04, 2022
—
A. Relevant Factual and Procedural History The Petitioner filed the orphan petition on behalf of the Beneficiary, his nephew and a citizen of Nigeria, in 2019 , when the Beneficiary was 11 years old. The Petitioner marked the box on the orphan petition indicating that the Beneficiary is an orphan because he "has only one sole or surviving parent who is inca…