Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 6101–6125 of 7923 (page 245 / 317)
FEB072022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 07, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2018, when the Petitioner was 18 years old, the Colorado District Court for (District Court) issued an Order Regarding Request for Specific Findings of Fact (SIJ order), in which it awarded custody of the Petitioner to her older sister and made determinations related to the Petitioner's SIJ eligibility. The Distri…
FEB072022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 07, 2022
—
A Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in July 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a supervisor in the I !District Attorney's Office inl I California (certifying official). The certifying official checked boxes indicatingthatthe Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to "False Im…
FEB072022_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 07, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was granted U nonimmigrant status in October 2013. She filed the instant U adjustment application in December 2016. In our prior decision, incorporated here by reference, we determined that the Applicant had not established that her continued presence in the United States was justified on humanitarian grounds,…
FEB072022_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 07, 2022
—
The record indicates that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the…
FEB072022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 07, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition with a Supplement B signed and certified by an interim police commissioner with the I I Maryland Police Department ( certifying official), based upon 2012 andl 2014 incidents whereby his car, money, and personal property were taken from him, and he was hit with a brick that was thr…
FEB072022_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 07, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was granted U-3 status from March 2015 until September 2018. The Applicant timely filed the instant U adjustment application in May 2018. The Director denied the Applicant's U adjustment application, concluding that he did not submit sufficient evidence to establish that he warranted adjustment of status to tha…
FEB072022_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 07, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition with a Supplement B signed and certified by the Assistant District Attorney with the I North Carolina, District Attorney's Office ( certifying official), based upon a 2006 incident whereby gunshots were fired in her home while she was inside. In response to Part 3.1 of the Suppleme…
FEB072022_04A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 07, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was granted U-3 nonimmigrant status as the child of a victim of qualifying criminal activity from December 2013 to December 2017, and timely filed his U adjustment application in November 2017. The Director denied the application, concluding that the Applicant had not submitted sufficient evidence to establish…
FEB042022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 04, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was granted U nonimmigrant status in May 2013. She filed the instant U adjustment application in April 201 7. In our prior decision, incorporated here by reference, we determined that the Applicant had not established that her continued presence in the United States was justified on humanitarian grounds, to ens…
FEB042022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 04, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a detective sergeant of the I Police Department in California ( certifying official). The certifying official checked boxes indicating that the Petitioner was a victim of criminal activity involving or similar to "Felonious Assaul…
FEB042022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 04, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in November 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a division commander in thel I Kansas Police Department ( certifying official). The certifying official checked a box indicating that in 2013 the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to "Oth…
FEB042022_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 04, 2022
—
The Applicant is seeking to adjust status to that of a lawful permanent resident. The record indicates the Applicant entered the United States without inspection and was apprehended three times in 1996, and she provided a false name and/or date of birth each time she was apprehended by immigration authorities. In denying the waiver application, the Director…
FEB042022_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 04, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a citizen of Ecuador, filed his U petition in November 2015. In January 2021, the Director denied the U petition because it was not accompanied by a properly executed Supplement B. The Petitioner filed motions to reopen and to reconsider claiming that he submitted a properly executed Supplement B at the time of filing his original U petition…
FEB032022_01A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 03, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was granted U-1 status from December 2013 until December 2017. The Applicant subsequently received an extension of her U nonimrnigrant status until April 2020 and timely filed the instant U adjustment application in November 2019 . The Director issued a request for evidence (RFE), notif…
FEB032022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 03, 2022
—
The Director found that Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. For the reasons discussed below, we agree with the Director…
FEB032022_01B9204
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 03, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner entered the United States in 2012 with a F-1 student visa. In 2016 she married a U.S. citizen with whom she claims she resided fro ml I 2016 until August 201 7 and filed her VA WA petition in December 201 7. With the petition she submitted a personal statement, police reports, a restraining order against her spouse, a…
FEB032022_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 03, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant entered the United States in 2002 , and in 2009 and 2010 worked for an embroidery factory,! where she claims she was victim of a severe fonn of trafficking
and escaped before the involvement of a law enforcement agency that investigated the company. With Form I-914 the Applicant submitted a Supplement B, signed by a c…
FEB032022_01D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 03, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed his U petition in I I 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by the "Desk Duty Officer" of the New York Police Department (certifying official). In 1 The Supplement B also provides factual information concerning the criminal activity, such as the specific violation of law that was investigated or prosecuted, and gives the certify…
FEB032022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 03, 2022
—
The Applicant does not contest the finding of inadmissibility for fraud or misrepresentation, a determination supported by the record. The issue on appeal is whether the Applicant's qualifying relative would experience extreme hardship if the waiver is denied. An applicant may show extreme hardship in two scenarios: 1) if the qualifying relative remains in…
FEB032022_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 03, 2022
—
The Applicant, a citizen of Turkey , was granted U nonimmigrant status from October 2015 to September 2019. He initially filed a U adjustment application in September 2018 , which USCIS denied in April 2019 because he was 21 days short of establishing his continuous physical presence in the United States for three years since his admission as a U nonimmigra…
FEB032022_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 03, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Kenya , married P-W-, 1 a U.S . citizen, in I 2006. She filed the instant VA WA petition in October 2016 based on this marriage. 1 We use initials to protect the privacy of individuals.
The Director denied the VA WA petition, determining, in pertinent part, that the Petitioner had not establi…
FEB032022_02D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 03, 2022
—
In this case, the Director found that the Applicant, who applied for T-1 nonimmigrant classification in 2018, did not establish that he was physically present in the United States on account of a severe form of trafficking in persons or that he would suffer extreme hardship involving unusual and severe harm if removed from the United States. In two statemen…
FEB032022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 03, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, last entered the United States without inspection in March 1993 . She was arrested inl 1996 for transportation/sale of a controlled substance under California Health and Safety Code § 11352(a). She filed her U petition and waiver application on March 3, 2015, and the Director denied both on July 1, 2019. In de…
FEB032022_03B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 03, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed a VA WA petition in May 2017, which was denied by the Director in April 2020 . The Petitioner timely appealed the adverse decision to our office in May 2020 by filing a Form 1290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion. The Petitioner indicated on the Form 1-290B that he would submit
his "brief and/or additional evidence ... within 30 calendar da…
FEB032022_03D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 03, 2022
—
In this case, the Director found that the Applicant, who applied for T-1 nonimmigrant classification in September 2018, did not establish that she was physically present in the United States on account of a severe form of trafficking in persons, as required.
A. The Applicant's Trafficking Experience
The Applicant describes how she experienced labor traffic…