Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 6451–6475 of 7923 (page 259 / 317)
DEC212021_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
The Applicant, a citizen of Mexico, was approved for U-1 nonimmigrant status from October 2014 until September 2018. On August 20, 2018, he filed the instant U adjustment application. The Director denied the application, determining that the Applicant had not demonstrated that his adjustment of status to that of an LPR was justified on humanitarian grounds,…
DEC212021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
In our prior decision, incorporated here by reference, we determined that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Ecuador, had not established that USCIS' consent to her SIJ classification was warranted because she had not demonstrated that her primary purpose in seeking the court order with SIJ-related findings was to obtain relief from parental abuse, neg…
DEC212021_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
The Applicant is a citizen of Brazil who last entered the United States in October 2009 from Canada with his spouse and two children without being inspected and admitted or paroled. He and his family were apprehended by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers upon entry and placed in removal proceedings. The Applicant initially sought asylum a…
DEC212021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
In this case, the Director found that the Petitioner is inadmissible to the United States under sections 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) (conviction or commission of a crime involving moral turpitude), 212(a)(2)(D)(i) (prostitution), 212(a)(6)(A)(i) (present in the United States without admission or parole), and 212(a)(6)(C)(i)(fraud or willful misrepresentation) of the…
DEC212021_01H2212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
As a preliminary matter, we note that the review of any motion is narrowly limited to the basis for the prior adverse decision. Here, although the Applicant addresses the Director's denial of the underlying waiver application, the prior adverse decision was our dismissal of his appeal. As such, the issue before us is whether the Applicant has submitted new…
DEC212021_01H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Applicant entered the Un ited States in 2001 on a B -1 visitor's visa. In I 12002, she was ordered removed by an Immigration Judge. The Applicant appealed the removal order, and in 2003, the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed the Applicant's appeal. The Applicant in this matter is seeking conditional approval of her Form 1-2…
DEC212021_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
A. Inadmissibility
The Director found that the Applicant is inadmissible to the United States under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for having obtained an immigration benefit by fraud or misrepresentation. Specifically, the record establishes that the Applicant misrepresented her marital status when she applied for, and subsequently obtained, a nonimmigr…
DEC212021_01H6212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
As a preliminary matter, we note that the review of any motion is narrowly limited to the basis for the prior adverse decision. Here, although the Applicant addresses the Director's denial of the underlying waiver application, the prior adverse decision was our dismissal of his appeal. As such, the issue before us is whether the Applicant has submitted new…
DEC212021_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
In our previous decision dismissing the Applicant's appeal, incorporated here by reference, we affirmed the Director's decision, agreeing that the negative factors presented by the Applicant outweighed the positive and mitigating factors. We acknowledged the positive and mitigating factors present in the Applicant's case. However, we agreed with the Directo…
DEC212021_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
Inl 12018, when the Petitioner, a native and citizen of El Salvador, was 18 years old, the Juvenile Court o~ I Georgia issued an order entitled Order of Adjudication and Disposition (initial
SIJ order). The initial SIJ order states that the matter came before the court inl 12018 and that the court previously entered an order finding the Petitioner dependen…
DEC212021_02D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States in 2004 with an H-2B visa. In July 2017, the Applicant filed the instant T application, asserting that he was the victim of trafficking by S-F-, 1 the U.S. company that employed him and that he maintains recruited, transported, and harbored him through force, fraud, and coercion for th…
DEC212021_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
The Petitioner's initial evidence included the U derivative petition, which is date-stamped to show that it was received at the Nebraska Service eenteron May 4, 2015, a copy of the users Fmm I-797e, Notice of Action (Fmm I-797e), advising the Petitioner that the U derivative petition was rectved by I users on May 4, 2015, and the Derivative's birth certific…
DEC212021_03A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Applicant, a citizen of Uzbekistan, filed his U adjustment application in January 2019. The Director denied the application, determining that the Applicant had departed the United States on April 23, 2019, after he filed his U adjustment application, and prior to the adjudication of his Form I-131, Application fo…
DEC212021_03D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in November 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified in May 2015 by a Lieutenant in the Youth and Family Services Division of the I I Police Depaitment inl I California (certifying official). The certifying official checked boxes in part 3 .1 of the Supplement B indicating tha…
DEC212021_04A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
In our previous decision dismissing the Applicant's appeal, incorporated here by reference, we affirmed the Director's decision, agreeing that the Applicant had not submitted a "Copy of Birth Folio (Copia de Folio del Libro de Nacimientos)" as required by the Department of State Country Reciprocity Schedule, and found that the Applicant's argument that we a…
DEC212021_04D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
A . Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in December 2015 with a Form I-918 Supplement B , U Nonimmigrant Status Certification (Supplement B) signed and certified by the Director of the Victim Assistance Unit of thel I Police Department id I Colorado ( certifying official). The certifying official checked a box indicatin…
DEC212021_05A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
The Applicant, a 29-year-old native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States without inspection in December 2007, when he was 15 years old. The Applicant's spouse filed a Form 1-918 Supplement A, Petition for Qualifying Member of U-1 Nonimmigrant (derivative U petition), on his behalf: which USCIS approved, according him derivative U-2 nonimmigrant…
DEC212021_05D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 21, 2021
—
The record reflects that in September 2015 the Petitioner filed his U petition with a Su]plement B signed and certified by the sheriff for th~ I Sheriffs Office inl Tennessee ( certifying official), certifying that the Petitioner was the victim of armed robbery stemming from criminal activity in 2007. In November 2019, the Director denied the petition, conc…
DEC202021_01B5203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 20, 2021
—
A. Eligibility for the Requested Classification As stated above, the first step to establishing eligibility for a national interest waiver is demonstrating qualification for the underlying EB-2 visa classification, as either an advanced degree professional or an individual of exceptional ability. The Director concluded that the Petitioner qualifies for EB-2…
DEC202021_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 20, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History Inl I 2016, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, thel I Family Court in New York appointed guardianship of the Petitioner to A-L-P-, 1 finding that such appointment "shall last until the [Petitioner's] 21st birthday." In a separate order issued the same day and titled ORDER SPECIAL JUVENILE STATUS (SIJ order), the F…
DEC202021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 20, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in September 2015 with a Supplement B signed and ce1tified by a Sergeant in thtj I Police Department inl I California ( certifying official). The certifying official checked boxes in part 3.1 of the Supplement B indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity inv…
DEC202021_01G1103
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 20, 2021
—
The Portland, Oregon ICE Field Office declared the bond breached, concluding that the Obligor did not deliver the bonded Foreign National to ICE upon request. The Obligor does not assert that it
delivered the bonded Foreign National to ICE as requested. Instead, the Obligor asserts that ICE failed to provide notice to the Obligor of its obligation to deliv…
DEC202021_02D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 20, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in November 2015 with a SuTplement B signed and certified in May 2015 by a Captain in thel I Police Department in I California ( certifying official) based on criminal activity against the Petitioner that occmTed in 2010. The certifying official checked a box in part 3 .1 of the Su…
DEC202021_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 20, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in March 2015 with a Supeement B signed and certified by the Chief of Police for the I I Police Department in I Minnesota ( certifying official) based on criminal activity against him in 2006. The certifying official checked boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of cr…
DEC202021_03H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Dec 20, 2021
—
The Applicant does not contest his inadmissibility, as described in the Director's decision, which we incorporate here. The Director determined that the Applicant's evidence of hardship to his spouse was not sufficient, individually or in the aggregate, to establish extreme hardship as defined above. The Applicant and his wife met in 2001, and have been coh…