Search cases

Compare defaults: v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52 vs v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Reset

Results

Showing 6626–6650 of 7923 (page 266 / 317)
NOV302021_05D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 30, 2021 The record demonstrates that the Petitioner's two granddaughters were the victims of sexual abuse in 2012. The Petitioner filed the instant U petition in September 2015, asserting that she was also a victim of the criminal activity committed against her granddaughters. She simultaneously filed the requisite Supplement B, certifying the qualifying crime of s…
NOV292021_01B9204
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 29, 2021 The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Colombia, married D-G-, 1 a U.S. citizen, inl 12017. In August 2018 , she filed the instant VA WA petition based on this marriage. The Director denied the petition, determining that the Petitioner had provided insufficient evidence to demonstrate that D -G­ subjected her to battery or extreme cruelty, as required. On…
NOV292021_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 29, 2021 1nLJ2019, when the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Ecuador, was 17 years old, a New York Family Court inl !(Family Court) issued an order granting guardianship of the Petitioner to his brother. On the same day, the Family Court additionally issued an order entitled ORDER­ Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJ order), stating, as relevant here: that th…
NOV292021_01D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 29, 2021 The Petitioner filed her U petition in August 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a sergeant in the family violence unit of the I !Police Department inl !Oklahoma (certifying official). The certifying official checked the boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to "Felonious Assault" and "Ot…
NOV292021_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 29, 2021 To prevail on her citizenship claim, the Applicant must establish that her mother was a U.S. citizen who was physically present in the United States for one continuous year before her birth abroad 1978. A. Previously Submitted Evidence and Procedural History The record contains two birth certificates for the Applicant, which list different people as her mot…
NOV292021_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 29, 2021 First, considering the Petitioner's appellate filing, we correct the record and note that he did submit evidence within the 30-day period after filing the appeal. The evidence he submitted was a psychological assessment. However , the Petitioner's appellate filing did not contain an indication of an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact within th…
NOV292021_04D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 29, 2021 The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, filed her U petition on July 13, 2020. The Petitioner did not submit a Supplement B with her U petition. Therefore, the Director denied the U petition for lacking initial evidence. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that she submitted a Supplement B with U petitions filed in February 2020, March 2020, and April…
NOV242021_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 24, 2021 A. Procedural History The Applicant was granted U-1 nonimmigrant status as the victim of qualifying criminal activity in November 2013, until November 2017. The Applicant filed the instant U adjustment application in September 2017. In July 2018, the Director issued a request for additional evidence (RFE) that indicated a criminal history check for the Appl…
NOV242021_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 24, 2021 The Petitioner, an artist, studied at the National Academy of Fine Arts and Architecture, Department of Painting, inc=] Russia. He claims that he has worked as a painter and has displayed his works at numerous venues and exhibitions. Because he has not indicated or established that he has received a major, internationally recognized award, he must satisfy a…
NOV242021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 24, 2021 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History Inl 12019, when the Petitioner was 18 years old, thel IDistrict Court for the state of Colorado (district court) issued an order titled, ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FINDINGS ESTABLISHING ELIGIBILTY FOR SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE STATUS (SIJ order), determining necessary findings for SIJ eligibility under…
NOV242021_01D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 24, 2021 The Applicant is a citizen of Mexico who last entered the United States in March 1996 with an H-2A Temporary Agricultural Worker visa. He filed his T application in September 2018. The Applicant is married and has three U.S. citizen children. A. The Applicant's Trafficking Claim In his psychological evaluation in support of his T application, the Applicant…
NOV242021_01H2212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 24, 2021 In this case, the record reflects, and the Applicant does not dispute, that on I rl 2011, she was convicted in the I I Judicial Circuit Court for I 7n Florida of: 1) Burglary/Unoccupied Dwelling, in violation of section 810.02(3)(b) of the Florida Statutes; and 2) Grand Theft, 3rd Degree, in violation of Florida Statutes section 812.014(2)(c). The Director…
NOV242021_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 24, 2021 A. Procedural History The Applicant was granted U-2 nonimmigrant status as the relative of a victim of qualifying criminal activity on May 21, 2013, until January 6, 2017. The Applicant filed the instant U adjustment application in January 2017. In his U adjustment application, the Applicant indicated that he had not been previously arrested. In December 20…
NOV242021_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 24, 2021 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History ~2016, when the Petitioner was 18 years old, thel !Judicial District Court inl I l_____JTexas (district court), issued an order entitled, ORDER IN SUIT AFFECTING PARENT CHILD RELATIONSHIP (SIJ order), declaring that the court made its findings "after examining the record and hearing the evidence and argument of Petit…
NOV242021_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 24, 2021 As a preliminary matter, we note that by regulation, the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision." 8 e.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l )(i). The issue before us is whether the Applicant has submitted new facts to warrant reopening or established that our decision to dismiss the appeal was based on an incorrect application oflaw or users policy. We incorporate…
NOV242021_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 24, 2021 A. Procedural History The Applicant was granted U-1 nonimmigrant status as the victim of qualifying criminal activity in October 2015, until September 2019. The Applicant filed the instant U adjustment application in December 2018. In June 2019, the Director issued a request for additional evidence (RFE) that indicated a criminal history check for the Appli…
NOV232021_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2021 The issue on motion is whether the Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was in U nonimmigrant status at the time she filed her U adjustment application. In our prior decision, which we incorporate here by reference, we noted that the record reflected that the Applicant filed her U adjustment application on October 1, 2018, and that her U nonimmigrant…
NOV232021_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2021 A. The Beneficiary as an Individual of Exceptional Ability The petition here was filed on November 30, 2018, seeking to classify the Beneficiary as an individual of exceptional ability in the performing arts to fill the offered job of singer/musician. The ETA 9089 states that the position requires 10 years of experience as a singer/musician. The Petitioner…
NOV232021_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2021 The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of the Bahamas, filed her VA WA petition in February 2018 based on abuse by her U.S . citizen spouse. The Director denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish that she is a person of good moral character. Upon review, we adopt and affirm the Director's decision with the…
NOV232021_01D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2021 The Applicant is a citizen of Guatemala who last entered the United States in 2001 without inspection, admission, or parole. She filed her T application in February 2018. A. The Applicant's Trafficking Claim In her personal statement in support of her T application, the Applicant reported that she grew up in a village in Guatemala and is fluent in only one…
NOV232021_01G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2021 The Los Angeles, California ICE Office declared the bond breached, concluding that the obligors did not deliver the bonded foreign national to ICE upon receipt of notice. The Co-Obligor files this appeal asserting that "[t]he issue on appeal is whether the Co-Obligor was properly served with notice of when and where to deliver the [F]oreign National." The C…
NOV232021_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2021 As a preliminary matter, we note that by regulation our review of the Applicant's instant motion filing is limited to the bases supporting "the prior decision." 8 C.F.R. § 103 .5(a)(l )(i). In our prior adverse decision, we dismissed her first motion filing for failing to satisfy motion filing requirements under the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2) and…
NOV232021_01H7212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2021 As a preliminary matter, we note that the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision." 8 C.F.R § 103 .5(a)(l )(i). The issue before us is whether the Applicant has submitted new facts to warrant reopening or established that our decision to dismiss the appeal was based on an incorrect application of law or USCIS policy. On motion, the Applicant con…
NOV232021_02A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2021 The record reflects that the Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was granted U-1 status from October2015 until September 2019, and timely filed the instant U adjustmentapplicationin July 2019. The Director then issued a request for evidence (RFE) asking that the Applicant submit a completed medical examination; with her response the Applicant submit…
NOV232021_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2021 The Petitioner submitted a VAWA petition in 2016 based on her relationship to her U.S. citizen spouse, J-A-S-1. The Petitioner married J-A-S-inl 12014. She departed for the United States without J-A-S-in February 2016 and claims to have resided in the United States since that date. In our previous decision, we concluded the Petitioner did not establish by a…
Prev Page 266 / 317 Next