Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 6676–6700 of 7923 (page 268 / 317)
NOV192021_02D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 19, 2021
—
The record shows that the Petitioner's son was shot multiple times by an unknown perpetrator while he was outside the family home. He died from the wounds shortly thereafter. The Petitioner assisted law enforcement in the investigation of the offense and filed the instant U petition on that basis in April 2015. A Victim of Qualifying Criminal Activity To es…
NOV192021_02E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 19, 2021
—
We incorporate our previous decision here by reference, and will only repeat the facts necessary to address the arguments the Applicant's father raises on motion. The Applicant was born in Ireland in 2009 to a U.S.-born citizen father and a noncitizen mother who were married at the time but later divorced. The Applicant's paternal grandfather was born in Ir…
NOV192021_02H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 19, 2021
—
On appeal, the Applicant claims that she is eligible to seek permission to reapply for admission under section 212(a)(9)(C)(ii) of the Act. The record reflects that the Applicant entered the United States without inspection in 1998, departed in 2003, entered without inspection in 2004, and departed in 2006. She was paroled into the United States in 2017 and…
NOV192021_02H6212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 19, 2021
—
The Applicant, a dual citizen of Brazil and Italy, does not contest his inadmissibility. As explained in the Director's decision, the Applicant entered the United States on a visitor's visa in March 2005 with an authorized stay of three months, but did not depart until April 2008. Since the Applicant accumulated more than one year of unlawful presence in th…
NOV192021_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 19, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, filed his U petition in December 2015 relating to events that occurred in I 12014. In relevant part, among other documents, the Petitioner submitted with the petition and in response to the Director's request for evidence (RFE), a Supplement B, copies of the incident report in two different formats, personal s…
NOV192021_04D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 19, 2021
—
Our previous decision described the procedural history of this case, which the Petitioner does not contest on motion and which we adopt here. Briefly, the Petitioner initially submitted a Form 1-918 Su pp lement B, U Non immigrant Status Certification (Supplement B), indicating that he was the victim of "Theft/Scam/Fraud," citing Colorado Revised Statutes §…
NOV192021_04H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 19, 2021
—
An applicant may show extreme hardship in two scenarios: 1) if the qualifying relative remains in the United States separated from the applicant, and 2) if the qualifying relative relocates overseas with the applicant. See 9 USCIS Policy Manua!B.4(B), https://www.uscis.gov/policymanual (providing, as guidance, the scenarios to consider in making extreme har…
NOV192021_05D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 19, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, filed his U petition on November 9, 2015. With his U petition, he provided a Supplement B signed six months and 15 days earlier on April 23, 2015, by the Director of the Office of Immigrant Affairs at thel I District Attorney's office ( certifying agency) indicating he was the victim of the crime of robbery…
NOV192021_05H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 19, 2021
—
The Applicant, a dual citizen of Brazil and Italy, does not contest his inadmissibility. As explained in the Director's decision, the Applicant entered the United States on a visitor's visa in March 2005 with an authorized stay of three months, but did not depart until April 2008. Since the Applicant accumulated more than one year of unlawful presence in th…
NOV182021_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
In denying the U adjustment application, the Director found that the Applicant had not demonstrated that his adjustment of status to an LPR was justified on humanitarian grounds, to ensure family unity, or was otherwise in the public interest. In making that determination, the Director observed multiple domestic violence-related arrests that raised public s…
NOV182021_01A7245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
The Applicant is a native and citizen of Cambodia and entered the United States as a visitor in 2012. USCIS granted the Applicant T nonimmigrant status from July 30, 2014, to July 29, 2018, as a victim of labor trafficking. The Applicant timely filed the U adjustment application in December 201 7. The Director denied the U adjustment application because the…
NOV182021_01B9204
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner is a native and citizen of Mexico who entered the United States without inspection in 1998. Inl t317 she married her U.S. citizen spouse with whom she claims she lived from March 2016 until 2017 and filed her VA WA petition in April 2018 . With the VA WA petition the Petitioner submitted a personal affidavit; letters…
NOV182021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
The record reflects that in April 2011, when the Petitioner, a native and citizen of India, was 15 years old, he entered the United States without admission, inspection, or parole. Inl I 2016, three weeks before the Petitioner's 21st birthday, a New York Family Court inl I (Family Court) appointed R-S-1 to be his guardian. On the same day, the Family Court…
NOV182021_01D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
The Applicant is a citizen of Brazil, who entered the United States without being inspected and admitted or paroled in 2005 and was subsequently ordered removed from the United States in absentia. In 2018, he filed the instant T application asserting that he is the victim of a severe of trafficking in persons by his father.
A. The Applicant's Trafficking C…
NOV182021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed their U petition in November of 2015 accompanied by a Supplement Bin which the certifying official checked the box under Part 3.1 indicating that he was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to felonious assault and assault with a deadly weapon. Within the narrative portion charact…
NOV182021_01E2309
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
The record indicates that the Applicant's father was a U.S. citizen, as it contains a copy of the father's birth certificate which shows that he was born in Texas inDl 936. To prevail on his U.S. citizenship claim, however, the Applicant must show that his father was plysiylly present in the United States for a total of 10 years prior to the Applicant's bir…
NOV182021_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
We denied the Applicant's appeal on April 22, 2020. The Applicant attempted to file a combined motion to reopen and reconsider but it was rejected on June 9, 2020, and returned to the Applicant because his Form 1-290B had not been folly completed. He resubmitted his motion to reopen and reconsider on June 26, 2020, and we dismissed it as untimely since the…
NOV182021_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner is a citizen of Tajikistan who initially entered the United States in 2008 with an F-1 stu~a; in 2015 he married his U.S. citizen spouse, F-D-M-, 1 with whom he indicates he lived froml__J 2015 until March 2016; the couple divorced in02016; and in June 2018 he filed a VA WA petition. 2 With the petition and in respons…
NOV182021_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
The record reflects that inl I 2018, when the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Honduras, was 18 years old, a General Court of Justice, District Court Division inl !North Carolina
(District Court) issued an Order Granting Permanent Custody (custody order) granting "sole permanent physical and legal care, custody, and control" of the Petitioner to his fat…
NOV182021_02D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Indonesia, entered the United States in May 2002 as an A3 domestic employee of a foreign official. In June 2018, the Applicant filed the instant T application, asserting that she was the victim of labor trafficking, having been recruited by N-Z- and obtained by Mr. and Mrs. D- through fraud and coercion for the purpose…
NOV182021_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
The Applicant must demonstrate that denial of the application would result in extreme hardship to a qualifying relative or relatives, in this case his U.S. citizen mother. An applicant may show extreme hardship in two scenarios: 1) if the qualifying relative remains in the United States separated from the applicant and 2) if the qualifying relative relocate…
NOV182021_03B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner is a citizen of Serbia who last entered the United States in 2014 with a J-1 exchange visitor visa, married his U .S. citizen spouse inl 12015, and filed his VAWA petition in May 201 7. With the petition and in response to the Director's request for evidence the Petitioner submitted personal affidavits, letters of sup…
NOV182021_03C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
Inl I 2018, when the Petitioner, a native and citizen of El Salvador, was 15 years old, the Virginia Circuit Court of the I !(Circuit Court) issued an Order (initial SIJ order)
granting custody of her to her mother. The initial SIJ order states, in pertinent part, that the Petitioner's father has neglected and abandoned her within the meaning of section 16…
NOV182021_03D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Albania, claims to have entered the United States in August 2005 using a false name and passport provided to her by her traffickers. In July 2018, the Applicant filed the instant T application, asserting that she was the victim of sex trafficking. The Director denied her T Application, finding that she is not physicall…
NOV182021_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2021
—
A Grounds for Dismissal of Appeal Overcome on Motion We dismissed the Petitioner's appeal because the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion (Notice of Appeal or Motion), underlying his appeal was not properly signed. Specifically, we noted that the Petitioner's signature on the Notice of Appeal or Motion did not match the signature on his underlying U pet…