Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 6726–6750 of 7923 (page 270 / 317)
NOV162021_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 16, 2021
—
The Applicant's mother filed a Form I-918 Supplement A, Petition for Qualifying Member of U-1 Nonimmigrant (U petition), on his behalf which USCIS approved, according him derivative U-3 nonimmigrant status from November 2, 2012, to May 11, 2014. The Applicant was in El Salvador at the time his U petition was approved, and he subsequently obtained a U visa t…
NOV162021_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 16, 2021
—
In this case, the Petitioner married S-H-1, a U.S. citizen, inl 12012. In his VA WA petition, the Petitioner indicated that he lived with S-H- from 12012 until May of 2015 i~ I Illinois, inserting a handwritten comment: "intermittent periods of cohabitation during this time." In his initial affidavit submitted with the petition, the Petitioner attested that…
NOV162021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 16, 2021
—
The record reflects that in December 2013, when the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Clina, 1 as 12 years old, she entered the United States on a student visa to attend a religious school. In 2019, when she was 17 years old, a New York Family Court inl !(Family Court) appointed the Petitioner's maternal grandmother to be her guardian. On the same day, th…
NOV162021_01D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 16, 2021
—
The Applicant is a citizen of the Philippines who first entered the United States in September 2008 as an H-2B nonimmigrant to be employed as an agricultural hand packer. He filed his T application in December 2017 on the basis that he was a victim of labor trafficking. The Director denied the T application and a subsequent motion to reopen and reconsider a…
NOV162021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 16, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in May 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a sergeant in thel !Police Department inl I California (certifying official) based on a crime perpetrated against him in 2005. The certifying official checked boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal act…
NOV162021_01G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 16, 2021
—
The Phoenix, Arizona ICE Field Office declared the bond breached, concluding that the Obligor and
Co-Obligor did not deliver the bonded foreign national to ICE upon receipt of notice. The Co-Obligor does not assert that it delivered the bonded foreign national to ICE as required by the Immigration Bond. Instead, it asserts that "[t]he issue on appeal is wh…
NOV162021_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 16, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In November of 2015, the Petitioner filed the U petition accompanied by a Suprement B form signed and certified by the inspector of the Special Victim Crime Unit within the !Police Department ( certifying official). The certifying official checked a box on the Supplement B under Part 3 .1 indicating the Petitioner wa…
NOV162021_02G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 16, 2021
—
A. The Co-Obligor Received Notice of the Time and Place to Deliver the Foreign National The first issue on appeal is whether the Obligor received notice of when and where to deliver the bonded foreign national. The ICE Field Office determined that the Obligor breached a delivery bond, as the foreign national was not delivered upon request. The regulation at…
NOV152021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 15, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History Inj1-__ _.l_2_0 _19"""",~when the Petitioner was 17 years old, the District Court for tho Judicial District inl !Texas (District Court), issued an ORDER OF DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND FINDINGS (declaratory judgment). In the declaratory judgment, the District Court found that the Petitioner is "dependent upon this juveni…
NOV152021_01D13101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 15, 2021
—
A. Motion to Reconsider The Petitioner has not demonstrated that our previous decision is based on an incorrect application of law or policy, nor has the Petitioner's motion shown that our prior decision is incorrect based on the evidence before us when we issued the decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(3). On motion, the Petitioner does not establish that we…
NOV152021_01D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 15, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in June 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by the Special Agent in Charge of the Criminal Division of the FBI inl I California ( certifying official). The certifying official checked boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or si…
NOV152021_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 15, 2021
—
The Applicant, a national of India, is currently in the United States and seeks permission to reapply for admission pursuant to the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(j) before departing the United States.1 He does not contest that he has an outstanding order of removal and will be inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act once he departs. 2 The on…
NOV152021_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 15, 2021
—
The issue in this matter is whether the Applicant has submitted new facts supported by documentary evidence sufficient to warrant reopening his appeal and established that our decision to dismiss the appeal was based on an incorrect application of law or USCIS policy. A. Motion to Reconsider In his brief in support of the motion to reconsider, the Applicant…
NOV122021_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 12, 2021
—
The Petitioner is a writer and author currently working and residing in Guatemala. Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has received a major, internationally recognized award, he must satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). The Director found that the Petitioner met only one of…
NOV122021_01H7212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 12, 2021
—
The Applicant asserts her admissibility to the United States, contending that she didn't know that her former co-worker would submit a false document to U.S. immigration officials. She states: "I will not stop insisting on an exemption from causes of inadmissibility for me, because I am fighting for the elimination of this great INJUSTICE." ( emphasis in or…
NOV122021_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 12, 2021
—
The Applicant is a 30-year old citizen of Mexico who last entered the United States without inspection and admission or parole in 2006. In October 2014, USCIS approved the Applicant's Form 1-918, Petition for U Nonimmigrant Status (U petition), and his Form 1-192, Application for Advance Permission to Enter as Nonimmigrant (waiver application). He timely fi…
NOV122021_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 12, 2021
—
The Applicant does not contest her inadmissibility. As explained in the Director's decision, the Applicant entered the United States with a B-2 visitor visa in April 1993, overstayed that visa, departed the United States in December 1999, re-entered the United States on a B-2 visitor visa in February 2000, and since then has remained in the United States. T…
NOV102021_01A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 10, 2021
—
The Applicant is a 23-year-old native and citizen of Guatemala. Her mother filed a Form 1-918 Supplement A, Petition for Qualifying Member of U-1 Nonimmigrant (U derivative petition), on her behalf, which USCIS approved, according her derivative U-3 nonimmigrant status from July 2013 to November 2016. The Applicant was in Guatemala at the time her U petitio…
NOV102021_01B9204
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 10, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of China, married E-Y-, 1 a U.S. citizen, in I I 2016 . She filed the instant VA WA petition in May 2018 based on this marriage. The Director denied the petition, determining that the Petitioner had not established that she entered into 1 We use initials to protect the privacy of individuals.
th…
NOV102021_01D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 10, 2021
—
The record demonstrates that the Petitioner's daughter was the victim of sexual assault in 2014 when she was 15 years old. The Supplement B indicates that the Petitioner made her daughter, the direct victim available to law enforcement for an interview about the sexual assault, which was perpetrated by her relative. 1 The Petitioner filed the instant U peti…
NOV102021_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 10, 2021
—
The Applicant does not contest the grounds for inadmissibility, as described in the Director's decision, which we incorporate here. 2 The issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has demonstrated that her U.S. citizen spouse would experience extreme hardship upon denial of the waiver. The Applicant must demonstrate that denial of the application would resul…
NOV102021_01H6212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 10, 2021
—
The Applicant does not dispute that he was unlawfully present in the United States for more than one year, but he contends that the stated grounds of inadmissibility do not apply. For the reasons explained below, we agree with the Director that the Applicant is inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(II) of the Act, but we conclude that the record does n…
NOV102021_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 10, 2021
—
The Applicant, a 40-year-old native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States without inspection in May 1999 when she was 18 years old. In August 2012, USCIS granted the Applicant U nonimmigrant status as a victim of domestic violence at the hands of her former partner and father of her children. The Applicant filed a U adjustment application in Sept…
NOV102021_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 10, 2021
—
A Relevant Facts and Procedural History In June of 2015 the Petitioner filed the U petition accompanied by a Supplement B signed and certified by the supervising deputy district attorney from thel I District Attorney's office. Within Part 3 .1, the certifying official checked a box indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving…
NOV102021_02H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 10, 2021
—
The Director found that the Applicant was inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud or misrepresentation, a determination supported by the record, which establishes that he misrepresented himself as a U.S. citizen in an attempt to enter the United States in November 1995.1 The Applicant does not contest this determination on appeal. Th…