Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 6926–6950 of 7923 (page 278 / 317)
OCT182021_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 18, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, filed the instant U petition in July 2014 that included a Supplement B certified by B-R-C-,2 identified as a Regional Administrator - Southwest of the U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL), Wage and Hour Division (WHD). Page 3 of the Supplement B indicated that the Petitioner "was subjected to a pattern of verba…
OCT182021_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 18, 2021
—
The Applicant does not dispute that she provided false information about her marital status on a nonimmigrant visa application in order to obtain an immigration benefit (in this case, a nonimmigrant visa by which she entered the United States). The Applicant asserts that she did so in order to escape persecution, but her motivation is not material to this s…
OCT182021_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 18, 2021
—
The record reflects that in May 2015 the Petitioner filed her U petition with a Supplement B signed and certified by a prosecutor for thel I California, County District Attorney's Office ( certifying official) certifying that the Petitioner was the victim of domestic violence stemming from criminal activity in 1998. In October 2019, the Director denied the…
OCT152021_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 15, 2021
—
The Applicant, a 25-year-old native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States without inspection in June 1998 when she was two years old. In March 2013, USCIS granted the Applicant U nonimmigrant status as the victim of qualifying criminal activity. The Applicant timely filed the instant U adjustment application in October 2019. The Director denied t…
OCT152021_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 15, 2021
—
The Petitioner is a surgical ophthalmologist. At the time of filing, she was emplord as the Associate Chief Physician for the Department of Ophthalmology at the I I Hospital,__ _ ___,l University in China. Because she has not indicated or established that she has received a major, internationally recognized award, the Petitioner must satisfy at least three…
OCT152021_01D13101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 15, 2021
—
In a November 2018 letter, the Petitioner's executive director,! I indicated that the Beneficiary was qualified for the proposed position-deputy imam - because "he received a Bachelor Degree of Facul of Islamic Call I I at the Department of Islamic Culture froml I University i in 2011; "he completed two years of post-graduate studies and obtained a Cultural…
OCT152021_01D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 15, 2021
—
In denying the U petition, the Director concluded that the Petitioner was inadmissible based upon the underlying denial of his waiver application. The Director noted that the Petitioner was subject to two grounds of inadmissibility, the first under section 212(a)(6)(A)(i) of the Act as a non-citizen who entered the United States without inspection or admiss…
OCT152021_02D13101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 15, 2021
—
As explained in our previous decision, the Petitioner submitted additional evidence on appeal, but failed to provide a brief or a statement that "identif[ied] specifically any erroneous conclusion oflaw or statement of fact for the appeal," as required under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l )(v), or that states its basis for appeal, as required on page 2 of the Form I…
OCT152021_02D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 15, 2021
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History The PetToner filed the jrtant U petition in April 2015 with a Supplement B certified by a Sergeant with the .__ ____ ____.Police Division in the State of Virginia ( certifying official). In Part 3 of the Supplement B, regarding the criminal acts perpetrated against the Petitioner, the certifying official checked t…
OCT152021_03D13101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 15, 2021
—
The Petitioner filed its petition in October 2019. It did not submit an IRS determination letter. In its response to the Director's request for evidence RFE the Petitioner claimed that it "has been added to the IRS Group Exemption o~.,----, _________ __. The record includes a February 1992 letter the IRS issued to '~~ .......... Fellowship of Ministers and…
OCT152021_04D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 15, 2021
—
The Petitioner filed the instant petition in September 2020. Prior to this petition, the Petitioner submitted another petition for the Beneficiary, which U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) approved, noting on the approval notice that the Beneficiary's nonimmigrant R-1 status was valid from May 2018 through November 2020. The Petitioner shared…
OCT142021_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 14, 2021
—
In this case, the Petitioner married J-H-2, a U.S. citizen, inl 12015 and indicated in his VA WA petition that he lived with J-H- froJ11 I 2015 until I ~O 15 itj I Georgia. In his initial affidavit submitted with the petition, the Petitioner stated that when they were dating, he lived i~ land J-H- was a student atl ~University inl I Georgia. He explained th…
OCT142021_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 14, 2021
—
In our prior decision on appeal, incorporated here by reference, we determined that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of El Salvador, had overcome certain grounds for which the Director denied his SIJ petition. Specifically, we concluded that due to the retroactive application of Massachusetts General Laws, chapter 119, section 39(M) (section 39M), the P…
OCT132021_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 13, 2021
—
In our prior decision, incorporated here by reference, we determined that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of El Salvador, had overcome certain grounds for which the Director denied her SIJ petition. Specifically, we concluded that due to the retroactive application of Massachusetts General Laws, chapter 119, section 39(M) (section 39M), the Petitioner…
OCT132021_01D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 13, 2021
—
The Petitioner filed his U petition in December 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by the sergeant of the Special Victim Crime Unit of thcl ] Police Department inl I California (certifying official). The certifying official checked the boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to '"Felonious Ass…
OCT132021_02C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 13, 2021
—
In our prior decision, incorporated here by reference, we determined that due to the retroactive application of Massachusetts General Laws, chapter 119, sectiln 3 9(~r ( section 3 9M), the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, had established that the Probate and Family Court of Massachusetts acted as a "juvenile court" within the meaning of sectio…
OCT122021_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 12, 2021
—
In Dhanasar, we held that a petitioner must identify "the specific endeavor that the foreign national proposes to undertake." Id. at 889. On the Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, the Petitioner provided the following information: Part 5 - Additional Information About the Petitioner
Section 11. Occupation: Marketing Management Specialist
Part…
OCT122021_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 12, 2021
—
In this case, the Petitioner filed the VA WA petition in January of 2018 and submitted documentation that a temporary restraining order had been issued against her U.S. citizen spouse, C-R-.1 According to the complaint for the temporary restraining order, the Petitioner and C-R- were arguing, and C-R- yelled at the Petitioner and then left the house with al…
OCT122021_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 12, 2021
—
The Applicant filed her underlying T application, as well as the T derivative application that is currently before us, in November of 2018 when the Derivative was 24 years old. The Director issued a request for evidence (RFE), finding that the Derivative, who was over the age of 21 when the Applicant filed her underlying T application, was ineligible for T-…
OCT122021_01F1101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 12, 2021
—
The issue in the Petitioner's case is whether she has established that the Beneficiary's sole parent was incapable of providing proper care in accordance with the local standards in Nigeria. The Petitioner filed the orphan petition on behalf of the Beneficiary, a citizen of Nigeria, in 2019, when the Beneficiary was eight years old. The Petitioner claims th…
OCT122021_01H2212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 12, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Cuba whom immigration officials paroled into the United States in 1995, concedes his conviction for a CIMT. The record shows that, while driving a motor vehicle in New Jersey inl ll 996, he evaded police despite receiving a signal to stop. In 1997, he pled guilty to eluding in the second degree under N.J. Stat. Ann.§ 2…
OCT122021_01H6212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 12, 2021
—
The Applicant, an adult national and citizen of Honduras, concedes that his spouse signed his waiver application. The record doesn't contain a POA or evidence that the Applicant is incapacitated or mentally incompetent. Thus, consistent with USCIS policy, the Director properly denied the application based on a deficient signature. On appeal, the Applicant s…
OCT122021_02D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 12, 2021
—
The Applicant, a 32-year-old native and citizen of Mexico, last entered the United States without being inspected, admitted, or paroled on or about April 2011. In August 2018, she filed her T application claiming her smuggler subjected her to involuntary servitude in the United States. However, the Applicant did not establish by a preponderance of the evide…
OCT122021_02H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 12, 2021
—
The Director concluded that the Applicant's multiple misrepresentations throughout his immigration filings warranted denial of his waiver application in the exercise of discretion. However, the Director did not properly consider all the evidence of hardship to his qualifying relative wife prior to addressing discretion. Following long-standing precedent, th…
OCT122021_02H6212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 12, 2021
—
The Director found- and the Applicant concedes -the Applicant's inadmissibility to the United States under sections 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(II) and (C)(i)(I) of the Act. The waiver application indicates that the Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States without admission or parole in September 1999 and left the country in May 2004. He sta…