Search cases

Compare defaults: v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52 vs v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Reset

Results

Showing 6976–7000 of 7923 (page 280 / 317)
OCT052021_03C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 05, 2021 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History 6 I 2018, when the Petitioner was 14 years old, thel I Circuit Court, Family Division in Kentucky (Family Court issued an order titled ORDER (SIJ order), determining findings necessary for SIJ eligibility under section 10l(a)(27)(J) of the Act. The Family Court found that the Petitioner's reunification with his fathe…
OCT052021_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 05, 2021 In March of 2015, the Petitioner filed the U petition with a Supplement B signed and certified by a member of the Office of the District Attorney of thel I in California ( certifying official). The certifying official checked a box on the Supplement B under Part 3 .1 indicating the Petitioner was a victim of felonious assault, conspiracy to commit any of th…
OCT052021_03G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 05, 2021 The issue on appeal is whether the Obligor received notice to deliver the bonded foreign national. The Obligor claims that he did not receive notice to deliver the foreign national, and so the bond should be reinstated. We disagree. When sending an ICE Form 1-340, Notice to Obligor to Deliver Alien, ICE must personally serve the notice. See 8 C.F.R. § I 03.…
OCT052021_04C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 05, 2021 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Afghanistan, filed the instant SIJ petition in March 2019. In support of the SIJ petition, he provided a I I 2018 court order from the Superior Court of California inl !(Superior Court) entitled Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings (SIJ order). The SIJ order states, in pertinent…
OCT042021_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 The Applicant, a citizen of Mexico , was granted U nonimmigrant status from October 1, 2015 , to September 30, 2019. She filed the instant U adjustment application on November 22, 2019. The Director concluded that the Applicant did not continue to hold U nonimmigrant status at the time she filed her U adjustment application and, accordingly, could not estab…
OCT042021_01B3203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 The Beneficiary received his Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University ofl I in June 2018. During his graduate studies, the Beneficiary worked as an intern for both._l _____ ___.I and I I in 2017. He has been employed as a Senior Research Scientist with the Petitioner's I I group since July 2018. In his decision, the Director found that the Beneficiary…
OCT042021_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 At the time of filing, the Petitioner was a project execution area supervisor a~----------.--~ I IIn reaponse to the Director's request for evidence, the Petitioner indicated that he was"recently appointed asl I lead." The Director concluded that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The Director also determined…
OCT042021_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Pakistan, married S-E-, 1 a U.S. citizen, in 2001. They divorced in I 12008. Inl I 2009, the Petitioner married A-Y-, also a U.S. citizen. The Petitioner filed the instant VA WA petition in 2017, alleging that A-Y- subjected him to battery or extreme cruelty. The Director denied the Petition,…
OCT042021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, claims to have entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in 2017. Inc=]2018, when the Petitioner was 18 years old, the I I Nebraska County Court (county court) issued an Order Appointing Guardian of a Minor (guardianship order). The county co…
OCT042021_01D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, asserts that he met D-C- 2 through his uncle in 2010, when he resided in Texas with his family. He learned thatD-C- was froml !Mexico, but had obtained lawful pennanent residence in the United States; he came and went across the border what seemed like every day. The Applicant further maintains that D-C- came t…
OCT042021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 In August 2015, the Petitioner filed her U petition with a Supplement B signed and certified on May 20, 2015, by a victim advocate of thd I Police Department inl I Georgia 1 The Supplement B also provides factual infonnation concerning the criminal activity, such as the specific violation of law that was investigated or prosecuted and gives the certifying a…
OCT042021_01G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 The Phoenix, Arizona ICE Field Office declared the bond breached, concluding that the Obligor and Co-Obligor did not deliver the Foreign National to ICE upon request. The Co-Obligor does not assert that it delivered the Foreign National to ICE as requested. Instead, it asserts that "[t]he issue on appeal is whether the Co-Obligor was properly served with no…
OCT042021_02A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 The Applicant, a 38-year old native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States in 2009 without inspection, admission, or parole. In September 2012, the Applicant filed her U petition, which was subsequently approved in October 2013. The Applicant filed the instant U adjustment application in October 2017. The Director denied the U adjustment applicati…
OCT042021_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 The Director denied the U petition in June 2014, and properly gave notice the Petitioner had 33 days to file an appeal or a motion. However, the Petitioner did not file a motion to reopen with the Director until April 2018, and the Director denied the motion as untimely. The Petitioner filed a timely appeal of the Director's denial of her motion, asserting…
OCT042021_02G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 The Baltimore, Maryland ICE Field Office declared the bond breached, concluding that the Obligor and Co-Obligor did not deliver the Foreign National to ICE upon request. The Co-Obligor does not assert that it delivered the Foreign National to ICE as requested. Instead, it asserts that "[t]he issue on appeal is whether the Co-Obligor was properly served with…
OCT042021_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 The Applicant is a 25-year-old citizen of Mexico who entered the United States as a visitor in 2001 and remained beyond the period of authorized stay. In October 2014, the Director granted the Applicant derivative U nonimmigrant status based on her family member's victimization and assistance to law enforcement. The Applicant filed her U adjustment applicat…
OCT042021_04A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 04, 2021 The Applicant, a citizen of Ecuador, was the beneficiary of a Form 1-918, Supplement A, Petition for Qualifying Family Member of a U-1 Recipient, which was approved in October 2014. The Applicant entered the United States in April 2015 and was granted U-3 nonimmigrant status as the child of a U1 recipient. The Applicant filed the instant U adjustment applic…
OCT032021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 03, 2021 The Petitioner filed their SIJ petition 011 I ~ , I '201 7. The Director denied the petition, concluding that because the Petitioner had already reached the age of majority in New York when the Family Court for I I (Family Court) issued orders relating to the Petitioner's eligibility for SIJ classification, the Petitioner did not establish that the Family C…
OCT012021_01G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 01, 2021 The New York, New York ICE Field Office declared the bond breached, concluding that the Obligor and Co-Obligor did not deliver the Foreign National to ICE upon request. The Co-Obligor does not assert that it delivered the Foreign National to ICE as requested. Instead, it asserts that "[t]he issue on appeal is whether the Co-Obligor was properly served with…
OCT012021_02G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 01, 2021 The New York, New York ICE Field Office declared the bond breached, concluding that the Obligor and Co-Obligor did not deliver the Foreign National to ICE upon request. The Co-Obligor does not assert that it delivered the Foreign National to ICE as requested. Instead, it asserts that "[t]he issue on appeal is whether the Co-Obligor was properly served with…
SEP272021_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 27, 2021 A. Procedural History We issued five previous decisions in this matter, all incorporated herein by reference. The Director revoked approval of the Petitioner's VAW A petition after concluding the Petitioner had not established a qualifying spousal relationship with a citizen of the United States. We dismissed the Petitioner's appeal of that decision on the…
SEP272021_01D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 27, 2021 A. The Applicant's Trafficking Claim The Applicant's personal statements set forth the following claim: The Applicant met E-R-2 in 2014 via Facebook. At the time, the Applicant lived with her mother and two children in her home country of Mexico. Through Facebook, E-R- would send nice messages to the Applicant and he told her that he wanted a serious relati…
SEP272021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 27, 2021 The Petitioner admits transporting drugs into the United States in her luggage from a trip abroad and acknowledges her conviction for that crime in which she was held in custody for 41 months. In denying the U petition, the Director noted that the Petitioner was inadmissible under the following provisions of the Act, each of which were related to her 2004 c…
SEP272021_01G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 27, 2021 The Baltimore, Maryland ICE Field Office declared the bond breached, concluding that the Obligor and Co-Obligor did not deliver the Foreign National to ICE upon request. The Co-Obligor does not assert that it delivered the Foreign National to ICE as requested. Instead, it asserts that "[t]he issue on appeal is whether the Co-Obligor was properly served with…
SEP272021_02D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 27, 2021 The Applicant is a citizen of Mexico who most recently entered the United States without admission, inspection, or parole in July 2005. He filed this T application in June 2018 based on his claim that the individuals who smuggled him into the United States subjected him to trafficking. A. The Applicant's Trafficking Claim According to the Applicant's initi…
Prev Page 280 / 317 Next