Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 7351–7375 of 7923 (page 295 / 317)
AUG102021_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 10, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner, a citizen of Mexico, first entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in 1998. Evidence in the record also reflects that the Petitioner was convicted of felony conspiracy under title 18 of the United States Code, section 3 71 . In a request for evidence (RFE) issued by the Director in connecti…
AUG102021_03H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 10, 2021
—
The Director found the Applicant, a citizen of Mali, inadmissible for fraud or misrepresentation for entering the United States in 2000 with a fraudulent passport. The Applicant does not contest the finding of inadmissibility on appeal. The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has established extreme hardship to her U.S. citizen spouse and whether she…
AUG102021_04B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 10, 2021
—
A. Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced Degree As noted above, the Director concluded that the Petitioner did not qualify for EB-2 classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree.4 Specifically, the Director raised concerns with the submitted employment letters and ultimately concluded that they did not establish that the P…
AUG102021_04D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 10, 2021
—
For the reasons discussed below, the Petitioner has not overcome our basis within the July 2020 motion dismissal through new evidence in its motion to reopen, nor has it established that the decision was based on an incorrect application oflaw or U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) policy, which is necessary to meet the requirements for filing…
AUG102021_05D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 10, 2021
—
In denying the U petition, the Director concluded that the Petitioner was inadmissible based upon the underlying denial of her waiver application. The Director noted that the Petitioner was inadmissible under the following provisions of the Act: • Section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) for committing fraud or willfully misrepresenting a material fact; • Section 212(a)(6)(…
AUG102021_06D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 10, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in July 2015 with a Form I-918 Supplement B, U Nonimmigrant Status Certification (Suplclement B) signed and certified by a lieutenant in the I I Police Department inl California ( certifying official). The certifying official checked a box indicating that the Petitioner was the vic…
AUG102021_07D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 10, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a citizen of Mexico, filed his U petition based on a felonious assault committed against his son J-. Within his initial statement, the Petitioner stated that in 2003 his daughter decided to live with her boyfriend, but her mother attempted to convince her to remain at home, which she did. When the boyfriend and his family realized she was no…
AUG092021_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
The Applicant's mother filed a Form 1-918 Supplement A, Petition for Qualifying Member of U-1 Nonimmigrant (U petition) on his behalf, and which USCIS approved, according him derivative U-3 nonimmigrant status from March 24, 2014, to March 23, 2018. The Applicant was in Guatemala at the time his U petition was approved, and he subsequently obtained a U visa…
AUG092021_01B5203
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
The Director found that the Petitoner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The sole issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. At the time of filing, the Petitioner was working as a "postdo…
AUG092021_01B6203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
The instant petition was filed on August 26, 2016, accompanied by a labor certification that was filed with the DOL on July 24, 2015, and certified in April 2016. In section Hof the labor certification the job duties of the proffered position - health, safety and sanitation engineer (HSS engineer) - were listed as follows in box 11: • Inspect and evaluate t…
AUG092021_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, filed the instant VA WA petition in March 2018, when she was 23 years old, based on her relationship with her stepfather, L-L-H-, 1 a 1 We use initials to protect the privacy of individuals.
U.S. citizen. The Director denied the petition, determining that the Petitioner had not demons…
AUG092021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
A. Relevant Factual and Procedural History I~ 1201 7, when the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Honduras, was 18 years old, a District Court inl I Texas (district court) issued an Order of Dependency and Findings (SIJ order) in which it entered findings relevant to the Petitioner's eligibility for SIJ classification. The SIJ order states, in pertinent pa…
AUG092021_01D8101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
The issue before us is whether the Petitioner has presented new facts to warrant reopening its appeal and/or established that our decision to dismiss its appeal was based on an incorrect application oflaw or USCIS policy. The Petitioner must specify the factual and legal issues raised on appeal that were decided in error or overlooked in our initial decisio…
AUG092021_02A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Applicant was granted U-4 status from June 20, 2013 until June 19, 2017, and filed the instant U adjustment application on October 21, 2019. In her decision, the Director correctly concluded that the Applicant did not demonstrate that she was in U status at the time of filing, as required, because her U-4 status had expired. The…
AUG092021_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The next issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. In revoking the approval of the petition, the Director decid…
AUG092021_02D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of El Salvador, filed his U petition in February 2015 as a victim of
felonious assault based on an incident that occurred i~ f 2013. With his U petition, he provided a Supplement B signed on February 13, 2015, by the Director of the Immigrant Affairs Program at 1he.__ _____ ____. District Attorney's Office ( certifying…
AUG092021_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
In our previous decisions dismissing the Applicant's motion to reopen and motion to reconsider, incorporated here by reference, we acknowledged and considered the new evidence Te Applicant submitted, but concluded that the negative factors presented by the Applicant, namely her 2009 criminal conviction for misdemeanor contributing to the sexual delinquency…
AUG092021_03B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
The Director concluded that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer,and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest The Petitioner proposes to "generat[e] scientific adva…
AUG092021_03D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, filed his U petition in September 2014 as a victim of felonious assault based on an incident that occurred in I I 2012. With his U petition, he provided a SupplementB signed on July 29, 2014, by a Captain ofthel I Washington Police Department ( certifying agency). The Supplement B indicates that the Petitioner…
AUG092021_04D14101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 09, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, filed her U f etition in July 2013 as a victim of domestic violence based on an incident that occurred inl 2009. With her U petition, she provided a Supplement B signed on January 23, 2013, by a Lieutenant of the I I Minnesota Police Department ( certifying agency). In response to Part 4 .2, regarding whether…
AUG062021_01B6203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 06, 2021
—
The instant petition was filed on November 3, 2016, accompanied by a labor certification that was filed with the DOL on May 27, 2016, and certified in August 2016. The petition was initially approved on June 9, 2017. On February 21, 2020, the Director issued a notice of intent to revoke (NOIR) the approval. After pointing out that the Petitioner answered "N…
AUG062021_01D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 06, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of El Salvador, last entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in 2014. In June 2018, the Applicant filed the instant T application.
A. The Applicant's Trafficking Claim
In summary, the Applicant explained in her written statements before the Director that in 2014, when she was 23 years old, she…
AUG062021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 06, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, filed his U petition in May 2015 based on aD 2014 incident in which he was struck by a car driven by a person under the influence, resulting in his leg being amputated. With his U petition, the Petitioner submitted a photocopy of the Supplement B signed by a Detective ( certifying official) from thd I Police D…
AUG062021_01H6212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 06, 2021
—
The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has established extreme hardship to her qualifying relative and, if so, whether a waiver of unlawful presence is warranted in the exercise of discretion. We have reviewed the entire record, as supplemented on appeal and conclude that the Applicant has not established extreme hardship to her qualifying relative,…
AUG062021_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 06, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In July 2015, the Petitioner filed his U petition with a Suf plement B si~ed and ce1iified by a first assistant at the I I District Attorney's Office i .__ ____ _. Texas ( certifying official). The certifying official checked boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or simila…