Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 7526–7550 of 7923 (page 302 / 317)
JUL072021_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 07, 2021
—
Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has received a major, internationally recognized award, he must satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). The Director found that the Petitioner met three of the evidentiary criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x), relating to original contr…
JUL072021_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 07, 2021
—
The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. For the reasons discussed below, we agree with the Direc…
JUL072021_01B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 07, 2021
—
To be eligible for the classification it requests for a beneficiary, a petitioner must establish that it has the ability to pay the proffered wage stated on the ETA 9089. As provided in the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2): The petitioner must demonstrate this ability at the time the priority date is established and continuing until the beneficiary obta…
JUL072021_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 07, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a 30-year old native and citizen of Mexico who entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in 2005, filed the instant VA WA petition in January 2017 based on his marriage to S-O-, 2 a U.S. citizen. As evidence of his good moral character, the Petitioner provided a written statement to the Director in response to a requ…
JUL072021_01D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 07, 2021
—
The Applicant, a 48-year-old native and citizen of Peru, last entered the United States without being inspected, admitted, or paroled in 1998. In January 2018, she filed her T application claiming her uncle subjected her to trafficking in the United States. The Director did not contest whether the Applicant was the victim of a severe form of trafficking, or…
JUL072021_01G1103
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 07, 2021
—
The issue on appeal is whether the Obligor substantially performed the conditions of a delivery bond. The Charlotte, North Carolina ICE Field Office determined that the Obligor breached the bond, as the foreign national was not delivered upon request. The record shows that the notice to deliver was sent to the Obligor' s address. On appeal, the Obligor does…
JUL072021_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 07, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Applicant used a fraudulent passpmi to procure admission to the United States onl I I 992, and he was found inadmissible to the United States under section 212( a)( 6)(C)(i) of the Act for procuring admission to the United States via fraud or misrepresentation. The Applicant does not contest this finding on motion. The issue on…
JUL072021_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 07, 2021
—
The Petitioner filed the instant U petition on June 23, 2015, which included a Supplement B dated July 14, 2014 . In Part 2 of the Supplement B, the "Name of Certifying Official" was identified as"Detective III [L-A-]."1 The "Name of Head of Certifying Agency" was listed as "Chief[C-B-]." The Supplement B was signed by "D II [C-R-]." 1 Initials are used thr…
JUL062021_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 06, 2021
—
The issue before us is whether the Applicant is eligible for permission to reapply for admission to the United States. The Applicant initially entered the United States without inspection on May 6, 2004, and he is the subject of an unexecuted in absentia removal order, dated! I 2004. The Director issued a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) in which he stated t…
JUL062021_02H2212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 06, 2021
—
The Applicant was found inadmissible for conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude, obstruction ofjustice, and he seeks a waiver of this inadmissibility. The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has demonstrated his U.S. citizen spouse would experience extreme hardship upon his departure from the United States, and whether the waiver should be g…
JUL062021_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 06, 2021
—
The Applicant was found inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud or misrepresentation and he does not contest that finding on appeal. Specifically, he sought to procure admission to the United States on December 5, 1990, by presenting a lawful permanent resident card that did not belong to him. The issue on appeal is whether the Appli…
JUL062021_02H6212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 06, 2021
—
The Applicant was found inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) of the Act for accruing unlawful presence from April 1, 1997, until February 1999, when he departed the United States.1 He does not contest this findings on appeal. The issue before us is whether the Applicant has established that his U.S. citizens spouse would experience extreme hardship du…
JUL062021_03H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 06, 2021
—
The Applicant was found inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud or misrepresentation. Specifically, he attempted to enter the United States with a fraudulentJapanese passp01i on March 26, 1993. The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has established extreme hardship to a qualifying relative, which includes his lawful permanent…
JUL062021_04D2101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 06, 2021
—
Upon review of the entire record, 3 we have determined that the Petitioner has not overcome the basis for the Director's revocation of the petition by demonstrating that the Beneficiary was qualified for a master's cap exemption. In the decision, the Director thoroughly discussed the basis for revoking the petition's approval in accordance with the requirem…
JUL062021_04H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 06, 2021
—
The issue on motion is whether the Applicant has established extreme hardship to his qualifying relative lawful permanent resident spouse. 1 In our prior decision, which we incorporate here, we found that the Applicant did not establish that his spouse would experience extreme hardship if she remained in the United States without him. On motion, the Applica…
JUL062021_05H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 06, 2021
—
The Applicant was found inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud or misrepresentation.1 The issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has established extreme hardship to his spouse. We find that the record does not establish that the Applicant's spouse would experience extreme hardship due to his continued inadmissibility. Our decision…
JUL062021_06H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 06, 2021
—
The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant is inadmissible for willful misrepresentation and whether he has demonstrated his lawful permanent resident parents would suffer extreme hardship upon denial of the waiver.
A. Inadmissibility
The Applicant contends he is not inadmissible because he did not willfully misrepresent a material fact. The Applicant…
JUL022021_01B2203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 02, 2021
—
The Petitioner is currently em lo ed as an Executive Assistant Chief En ineer and Mana er of Research Center with .__-------------------------===' i-----------~in China. She indicates her intent to continue employment in the design o~.__ ______ _ systems in the United States .
A. Evidentiary Criteria
Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established…
JUL022021_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 02, 2021
—
The instant petition was accompanied by a labor certification that indicates the following in section H (Job Opportunity Information) regarding the requirements for the position of solution architect: 4. 4-A. 5. 6. 6-A. 7. 8. 8-A. 8-C. 9. 10. 10-A. 10-B. Education: Minimum level required: Major field of study Is training required for the job? Is experience…
JUL022021_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 02, 2021
—
The Applicant, a citizen of Nigeria, last entered the United States temporarily as an F-1 student in November 2013. In August 2018, he filed his T application claiming his basketball coach and designated school official (DSO) subjected him to trafficking in the United States. While the Applicant has established he is a victim of a severe form of trafficking…
JUL022021_01H2212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 02, 2021
—
The Applicant was found inadmissible for fraud or misrepresentation for failing to disclose his criminal history on his visa application, and he was found inadmissible for committing a crime involving moral turpitude (attempted unlawful sexual conduct with a minor). 2 He seeks a waiver of these grounds of inadmissibility. The issues on appeal are whether th…
JUL022021_01H4212
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 02, 2021
—
The Applicant has been found inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(A) of the Act for having been previously ordered removed. The Applicant is currently in the United States and seeks permission to reapply for admission pursuant to the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(j) before departing the United States. 1 He does not contest that he has an outstanding order…
JUL022021_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 02, 2021
—
The Applicant was found inadmissible for fraud or misrepresentation for failing to disclose his criminal history on his visa application, and he was found inadmissible for committing a crime involving moral turpitude (attempted unlawful sexual conduct with a minor). 2 He seeks a waiver of these grounds of inadmissibility. The issues on appeal are whether th…
JUL012021_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 01, 2021
—
The Petitioner is a film and television director who has directed e isodes of rimetime television series In addition, she has written and directedL----------r------,..Jfilms. The record reflects that the Petitioner has a bachelor of arts from The University and is a graduate of the.__ _______ _.'s I I and I I Program. She currently works in the United State…
JUL012021_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jul 01, 2021
—
The Director concluded that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The Director also determined that the Petitioner had established that the proposed endeavor met the substantial merit portion of the first prong set forth in the Dhanasar analytical framework. The Director's decision then discussed the deficiencie…