Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 7726–7750 of 7923 (page 310 / 317)
JUN042021_01D6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 04, 2021
—
For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the Petitioner has not satisfied the statutory and regulatory requirements for classifying the Beneficiary as a K-1 nonimmigrant. In particular, we find 2
three separate factors independently bar approval of this petition: (1) inconsistent evidence in the record; (2) the Petitioner's failure to establish th…
JUN042021_01H2212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 04, 2021
—
The Applicant does not contest his inadmissibility on appeal. Therefore, the issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has established his eligibility to apply for a waiver under section 212(h)(l )(A) or (B) of the Act, and if so, whether he merits a favorable exercise of discretion. As explained below, we find that the Applicant has established his eligib…
JUN042021_03H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 04, 2021
—
The Director found the Applicant, a citizen of Ukraine, inadmissible for fraud or misrepresentation for willfully misrepresenting her marital status when seeking admission in 2007 with a nonimmigrant visa. The Applicant does not contest the finding of inadmissibility on appeal. The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has established extreme hardship…
JUN032021_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 03, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of India, married his U.S. citizen spouse, J-L-, 1 inl 12016 while in removal proceedings. He filed the instant VAWA petition in March 2017. In our prior decision, incorporated here by reference, we concurred with the Director's determination that the Petitioner had not established by a preponderance of the evidence that…
JUN032021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 03, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in June 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified b[ the Chief of the Family Violence Unit with the I I State Attorney's Office in I Maryland ( certifying official). The certifying official checked a box indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involvi…
JUN032021_01D9101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 03, 2021
—
The Petitioner operates as a martial arts trammg facility specializing in ~--------~ instructional programs. Page 4 of the petition indicates that the Petitioner seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a "Professional Athlete."1 The Petitioner stated at question #5 on the O and P Classification Supplement that the Beneficiary's proposed duties would be to "[c]om…
JUN032021_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 03, 2021
—
In this case, the Applicant filed his waiver application due to inadmissibility for fraud or willful misrepresentation under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act, and seeks a waiver of this inadmissibility under section 212(i) of the Act. The Applicant contends he is a stateless Tibetan and he willfully mispresented a material fact when he was admitted into t…
JUN032021_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 03, 2021
—
The record shows that the Petitioner, a 52-year old citizen of Brazil, met I-V-R-1 and her spouse in 2005. They lived with the Petitioner for a few months before moving into their own home. During that time, 1-V-R- confided in the Petitioner that her spouse was abusive and had repeatedly told her that "her life days were numbered." 1-V-R- divorced her spous…
JUN022021_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 02, 2021
—
The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. 4 The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. At the time of filing, the Petitioner indicated employ…
JUN022021_01B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 02, 2021
—
A. Procedural History
The instant petition was filed with USCIS on November 29, 2019, accompanied by a labor certification that was filed with the DOL on June 27, 2019, and approved on September 6, 2019. The labor certification states that the proffered position is a programmer analyst and describes the job duties as follows: Convert project specifications…
JUN022021_01C1101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 02, 2021
—
As a preliminary matter, we note that the scope of review in any motion is narrowly limited to the basis of the prior adverse decision. In this case, the prior adverse decision was based on the Petitioner's failure to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for its appeal. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v). As such, although t…
JUN022021_01D6101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 02, 2021
—
The only issues on appeal are whether the evidence is sufficient to 1) demonstrate the Beneficiary's intent to marry the Petitioner and 2) whether such intent is bona fide. 1 On appeal, the Petitioner submits new evidence including copies ofFacebook messages the couple exchanged, the Beneficiary's signed relationship statement, and a declaration of intent t…
JUN022021_01D9101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 02, 2021
—
According to pages 4 and 5 of the petition, the Petitioner seeks to hire the Beneficiary as a full-time mixed martial artist, intending to ray her $500 a week in wages. In a January 2020 letter, the petitioning organization's manager, l categorized the Petitioner as the "Employer," the Beneficiary as the "Employee," and provided information on "the position…
JUN022021_04D6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 02, 2021
—
Upon review of the record in its totality, we conclude that the Petitioner has not established eligibility pursuant to section 214( d) of the Act. Specifically, the record does not merit a discretionary waiver of the IMBRA limitations, and does not establish a bona fide intent to marry. First, the Petitioner is subject to the IMBRA limitations because he ha…
JUN012021_01A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Guatemala, was granted U nonimmigrant classification in October 2015 for a period ending in September 2019. In June 2019, she timely filed the instant U adjustment application, which the Director denied, finding that she had not complied with the
requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 245.24(d)(5) because the copy of her cmrent p…
JUN012021_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2021
—
The Petitioner indicates that after he co-founded.__ ________ an instrument and apparatus business that measures an I I in 2005, he returned to China in November 2018 but"maintains good disclosure of his activities atl ~ with [the] University! I 2
.__ ____ __.I' Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has received a major, internati…
JUN012021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2021
—
A full review of the record, including the evidence submitted on appeal, does not establish the Petitioner's eligibility. The appeal will be dismissed for the following reasons. The Petitioner is a citizen of Mexico who claims to have entered the United States without admission, parole, or inspection in May 1988. The Petitioner's immigration record indicate…
JUN012021_01D9101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2021
—
In August 2019, the Petitioner, self-described as a "sports agency and I I institution," filed the Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker. It indicated that the Beneficiary would serve as aD Coach under the current P-1 S petition. The Petitioner indicated at question #5 on the O and P Classification Supplement that the Beneficiary's proposed duties…
JUN012021_01H2212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2021
—
The record reflects that by using a B 1/B2 Visa/BCC issued in 2006 the Applicant entered the United States on multiple occasions, most recently in 2011, in eff mt to find employment. The Applicant was found to have made a material misrepresentation to gain a benefit under the Act by using a visitor visa to live and work in the United States. Following his 2…
JUN012021_01H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Applicant entered the United States without inspection in 2003 and in 2006 was issued an order of removal by an Immigration Judge. In 2010 the Applicant was granted Temporary Protected Status (TPS), which he has continued to renew. The Director noted that the Applicant departed from and returned to the United States in 2016, but…
JUN012021_01H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2021
—
The record reflects that by using a B 1/B2 Visa/BCC issued in 2006 the Applicant entered the United States on multiple occasions, most recently in 2011, in eff mt to find employment. The Applicant was found to have made a material misrepresentation to gain a benefit under the Act by using a visitor visa to live and work in the United States. Following his 2…
JUN012021_01H6212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2021
—
The record reflects that by using a B 1/B2 Visa/BCC issued in 2006 the Applicant entered the United States on multiple occasions, most recently in 2011, in eff mt to find employment. The Applicant was found to have made a material misrepresentation to gain a benefit under the Act by using a visitor visa to live and work in the United States. Following his 2…
JUN012021_02A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was granted U-3 nonimmigrant classification in November 2015 for a period ending in November 2019. In October 2019, he timely filed the instant U adjustment application, which the Director denied, finding that he had not complied with the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 245.24(d)(5) because the main photograph on th…
JUN012021_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of the Ptli::inrs, met E-J-, 1 a U.S. citizen, in May 2015. The Petitioner explained that she married E-J-in 2016, and that she left the relationship in02017 . She filed the instant VAWA petition in November 2017. The Director denied the petition, determining, as relevant here, that the Petitione…
JUN012021_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jun 01, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In February 2015l the Petitioner filed her U petition with a Supplement B signed and certified by a lieutenant in the I Police Department in I I California ( certifying official). The certifying official checked boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to "False Im…