Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 7801–7825 of 7923 (page 313 / 317)
MAY242021_02B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 24, 2021
—
The Petitioner is an anesthesiologist and professor at thd~---~----~IMedical University.
A. Evidentiary C1iteria
Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that she has received a major, internationally recognized award, she must satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). The Petitioner initia…
MAY242021_02B3203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 24, 2021
—
The Beneficiary received both his Master of Science degree and Ph.D. in Physics and Astronomy from I !University in 2017. From January 2017 until February 2018, he worked as a quantitative research associate for I I Additionally, he served as a quantitative analytics intern at.__ _____ _.for approximately two months in 201 q The Renefici,ry is currently emp…
MAY242021_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 24, 2021
—
The Director found that the Petitioner qualified for the underlying EB-2 visa classification. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4)(ii) states, in pertinent part…
MAY242021_02H4212
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 24, 2021
—
The issue presented on appeal is whether the Applicant should be granted permission to reapply in the exercise of discretion. The Applicant does not contest the Director's finding that he is inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(A) of the Act. This finding is supported by the record, which reflects that the Applicant entered the United States without inspect…
MAY212021_01A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 21, 2021
—
The Applicant is a 46-year old citizen of Mexico who was granted U-1 status from November 15, 2013, to November 14, 2017 , based on her family member's victimization and assistance to law enforcement. The Applicant filed her U adjustment application in 201 7.
In February 2020, the Director denied the Applicant's U adjustment application, determining that t…
MAY212021_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 21, 2021
—
The Petitioner indicates employment since 2012 as an associate professor of business administration atl I University, Taiwan. The record reflects that she received her Ph.D. in human resource management froml I University, Taiwan in 2008. Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that she has received a major, internationally recognized award,…
MAY212021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 21, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In I I 2016, when the Petitioner was 16 years old, the District Court inl I Texas (District Court), issued an Order of Declarat01y Judgment and Findings (declaratory judgment), in which it determined that the Petitioner was dependent on the District Court; that the Petitioner's reunification with his father was not v…
MAY212021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 21, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a citizen of Mexico, filed her U petition in March 2015 relating to events that occurred in 2011. With the petition and in response to the Director's request for evidence, the Petitioner submitted a Supplement B, a police incident report, court documents, personal statements, an evaluation by a licensed therapist, medical records, and affida…
MAY212021_01D15245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 21, 2021
—
The Petitioner and the Derivative were married in I 12012. The Petitioner was granted U nonimmigrant status and subsequently became a lawful permanent resident in January 2017. She
filed the instant U immigrant petition on behalf of the Derivative in August 2017. The Director denied the U immigrant petition in May 2019, concluding that the Derivative had a…
MAY212021_01H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 21, 2021
—
The Applicant is currently in the United States and seeks permission to reapply for admission pursuant to the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(i) before departing from the United States.1 She does not contest that she has an outstanding order of deportation and will be inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act once she departs. 2 The only issue o…
MAY212021_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 21, 2021
—
The Applicant does not contest that he is inadmissible to the United States under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for having obtained an immigration benefit by fraud or misrepresentation.1 The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has established extreme hardship to his father and, if so, whether he merits a waiver as a matter of discretion. We have…
MAY212021_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 21, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Egypt, entered the United States with a B-2 nonimmigrant visa in July 2001. In October 2015, the Applicant was granted U-1 status based on being the victim of a felonious assault and robbery and subsequently assisting law enforcement. The Applicant timely filed the instant U adjustment application in December 2018. The…
MAY202021_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 20, 2021
—
The facts and evidence presented in the instant matter wan-ant a finding of willful misrepresentation of a material fact against the Petitioner. National Association for Liquor Spirits Circulation, the China General Chamber of Commerce, the China Green Ribbon Care Association, and thl I Wine & Spirits Association. 2 The record reflects that this petition wa…
MAY202021_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 20, 2021
—
The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. At the time of filing, the Petitioner held the position…
MAY202021_01B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 20, 2021
—
To be eligible for classification as a skilled worker a beneficiary must have at least two years of training or experience. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(1)(3)(ii)(B). A beneficiary must also meet the specific educational, training, experience, and other requirements of the labor certification underlying the petition. Id. All requirements must be met by the petition…
MAY202021_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 20, 2021
—
The Petitioner submitted a VAW A petition based on his relationship to his U.S. citizen spouse, S-G-. In two personal statements, he described that they met in June 2013 at a bar in I J Virginia while he was travelling for work as an interstate truck driver. He related that he was living with friends in Illinois at the time and he stayed in touch with S-G-…
MAY202021_01D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 20, 2021
—
The record reflects that in October 2020, the Petitioner's U petition was approved. In July 2015, the Petitioner filed the instant derivative U petition on behalf of the Derivative, which was denied in December 2019. In her decision, the Director concluded that the qualifying family relationship between the Petitioner and the Derivative did not continue to…
MAY202021_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 20, 2021
—
As acknowledged by the Director, the record demonstrates that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. 3 The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. The Petitioner i…
MAY202021_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 20, 2021
—
The Petitioner submitted a VA WA etition in 201 7 based on his relationship to T-W-. His petition indicated that they married in 2012, resided together from April 2012 until June 2014, and their last residence was an apartment in~ _ __.Texas from March 2013 until June 2014. In an initial personal statement, the Petitioner described that he moved into T-W-'…
MAY202021_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 20, 2021
—
The Petitioner filed the instant petition in March 2015. With the petition, the Petitioner submitted a Supplement B certified by Detective M-D-S- 1 of the I I (North Carolina) Sheriff's Office. The Director, in a request for evidence (RFE), noted that the Supplement B had not been signed by an individual recognized as a certifying official. Specifically the…
MAY192021_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 19, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, entered the United States without inspection, admission, or 1 parole {n January 2017. InO20l 7, when the Petitioner was 17 years old, the District Court for the Judicial District inl !Texas (District Court), issued an Order of Declaratory Judgment and Findings ( decl…
MAY192021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 19, 2021
—
In our previous decisions on appeal and motions to reopen and reconsider, we concluded the Petitioner had not demonstrated he suffered substantial physical or mental abuse as a result of extortion. We previously found, based on the record before us, that the Petitioner was one of many victims of immigration fraud and extortion by individuals, one posing as…
MAY192021_01H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 19, 2021
—
The Applicant is the subject of an unexecuted in absentia removal order, dated I • 12005. The Applicant does not contest that she will become inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act, upon departure from the United States, for having been previously ordered removed. In his discretionary analysis, the Director listed several favorable and unfav…
MAY192021_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 19, 2021
—
The Director determined that the U petition was not approvable because the record did not establish the Petitioner suffered substantial mental or physical abuse as a victim of qualifying criminal activity. The Director also determined that the Petitioner did not demonstrate her admissibility to the United States. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that her F…
MAY192021_02H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 19, 2021
—
The Applicant entered the United States without inspection onl J 2012, and she received an expedited removal order onl I 2012. She was required to report to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement under an order of supervision on] I 2013, she did not report as required, and she has remained in the United States since then. The Applicant will become inadmis…