Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 7851–7875 of 7923 (page 315 / 317)
MAY142021_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 14, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in March 2002. The Applicant filed a U petition as the victim of a felonious assault in January 2013. Concurrent with the filing of his U petition, the Applicant also filed a Form 1-192, Application for Advance Permission to Enter as Nonimmigran…
MAY142021_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 14, 2021
—
A. Evidentiary Criteria
The Petitioner is a violinist who has performed with several ensembles and orchestras. Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that she has received a major, internationally recognized award, she must satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i) (x). In denying the petition…
MAY142021_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 14, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Colombia, 1 entered the United States in February 2016 on a visitor visa. In February 2018, she filed the instant VAWA petition. A. Relevant Factual and Procedural History In the record before the Director, the Petitioner explained that she first met her spouse, B-P-, 2 during a visit to the United States in 2002, as…
MAY142021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 14, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History Inl 12018, when the Petitioner was 16 years old, a probate and family court inl~-~ Massachusetts (Family Court) issued an order entitled Order of Special Findings of Fact and Rulings of Law (SIJ order), declaring the Petitioner to be dependent on the court and stating that he is placed under the physical and permanen…
MAY142021_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 14, 2021
—
The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus of a labor certification, would be in the national interest. For the reasons discussed below, the Petitioner has n…
MAY142021_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 14, 2021
—
InD 2016, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, thel !Probate and Family Court in Massachusetts (Family Court) issued a Decree of Special Findings of Fact and Rulings of Law (SU order) containing SU-related findings for the Petitioner. On motion, the Petitioner now submits aNunc Pro Tune Special Findings of Fact and Rulings of Law (amended SU order) issued…
MAY142021_03B5203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 14, 2021
—
The Petitioner is a I I wrestler and he proposes "to continue working in [his] area of expertise."4 In this matter, the Director determined that the Petitioner qualifies as an individual of exceptional ability, but concluded that he did not meet any of three prongs set forth in the Dhanasar analytical framework.
A. Exceptional Ability
For the reasons discu…
MAY142021_04B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 14, 2021
—
The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. At the time of filing, the Petitioner held the position…
MAY132021_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 13, 2021
—
The Applicant is a citizen of Guatemala. The Applicant's father filed a derivative U petition on his behalf, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) approved his derivative U-3 nonimmigrant status on October 10, 2013. The Applicant was in Guatemala at the time his U petition was approved, and he subsequently obtained a U visa through consular…
MAY132021_01B2203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 13, 2021
—
The Petitioner is a medical researcher who indicates that he is currently employed as a Chief Research Fellow a...__ ____________________ -,--_ ___. The record reflects that the Petitioner previously served as Head of the Department of Medical History at~------~ Medical University from 2010 until 2017.
A. Evidentiary Criteria
Because the Petitioner has not…
MAY132021_01B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 13, 2021
—
The instant petition was filed with USCIS on July 16, 2018, accompanied by a labor certification that was filed with the DOL on January 5, 2018, and certified on May 15, 2018. A beneficiary must meet the specific educational, training, experience, and other requirements of the labor certification, regardless of the classification requested. See 8 C.F.R. § 2…
MAY132021_01C1101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 13, 2021
—
As noted, to establish eligibility to classify the Beneficiary as a special immigrant religious worker, the Petitioner must show that the Beneficiary worked foll-time, and received compensation, as a qualifying religious worker during the two-year period before the Petitioner filed the petition. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(m)( 4); see also 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(m)(2).…
MAY132021_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 13, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2018, when the Petitioner was 17 years old, theOJudicial District Court inl I Texas issued an order entitled Order of Declaratory Judgment and Findings (SIJ order) declaring, in pertinent part, that the Petitioner is "dependent upon this juvenile court while [he] is under the jurisdiction of this Court." In suppor…
MAY132021_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 13, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States in 2001 and was approved for U-1 nonimmigrant status on November 20, 2015. On October 9, 2018 he filed the instant U adjustment application. The Director denied the Applicant's U adjustment application. The Director acknowledged the positive and mitigating equi…
MAY132021_02B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 13, 2021
—
As a preliminary matter, we note that by regulation, the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision," which in this case was our dismissal of the Petitioner's previous combinedmotion to reopen and motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i). The issue before us is whether the Petitioner has submitted new facts to warrant reopening or establ…
MAY132021_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 13, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2018, when the Petitioner was 16 years old, theOJudicial District Court in~I -----~ Texas issued an order entitled Final Order, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Declaration of Dependency (SU order) declaring, in pertinent part, that the Petitioner is "dependent upon this Court in accordance with the law o…
MAY132021_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 13, 2021
—
USCIS granted the Applicant U-1 nonimmigrant status from October 2015 to September 2019. The Applicant filed her U adjustment application in September 2019. The Director determined that the
Applicant was not eligible to adjust her status to that of an LPR because, at the time of filing her U adjustment application, she did not demonstrate her physical pres…
MAY132021_03C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 13, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2019, when the Petitioner was 17 years old, the D Judicial District Court inl I Texas issued an order entitled Order of Declaratory Judgment and Findings (SIJ order) declaring, in pertinent part, that the Petitioner is "dependent upon this juvenile court while [he] is under the jurisdiction of this Court pursuant…
MAY132021_04C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 13, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2016, when the Petitioner was 19 years old, the Family Court for......_. ____ ~_.New York (juvenile court) appointed guardianship of the Petitioner to A-S- 1 in proceedings under section 661 of the New York Family Court Act and section 1707 of the New York Surrogate's Court Procedures Act. The Family Court ordered…
MAY132021_05C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 13, 2021
—
In 201 7, when the Petitioner was 1 7 years old, a circuit court inl I Florida (juvenile court) issued an Order Granting Petition for Temporary Custody by Extended Family (order) granting custody of the Petitioner to his cousin. The order states that the Petitioner's mother is deceased and that his father filed a waiver and consent to the award of temporary…
MAY122021_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 12, 2021
—
The Applicant was approved for U nonimmigrant status from October 2014 until September 2018. In June 2018, the Applicant filed his U adjustment application. As noted by the Director in her denial decision, the Applicant's initial filing did not include several pieces ofrequired evidence. In response to a request for evidence (RFE), the Applicant submitted d…
MAY122021_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 12, 2021
—
The Petitioner has employed the Beneficiary as its Campus Biological Safety Officer since May 2018 and intends to continue to employ her in this position. The Beneficiary earned her doctorate in biological sciences ( environmental microbiology) in 2014 and has worked in the biological safety and biosecurity field since that time.
A. Evidentiary Criteria
Be…
MAY122021_01B7203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 12, 2021
—
The Petitioner maintains that she qualifies for the EB-5 classification based on a $500,0002 investment in the NCE, a business that is associated with a United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)-designated regional center, 3 I I See 8 C.F.R. § 204.6(j)(4)(iii). According to the initial business plan, the NCE seeks to raise up to $98,000,000…
MAY122021_01C1101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 12, 2021
—
The Petitioner claims that the Beneficiary has been working as a foll-time religious worker for the petitioning organization since November 2016. The Petitioner seeks to classify the Beneficiary as an immigrant religious worker and plans to continue to employ him as a foll-time religious worker. On appeal, the Petitioner states that the proposed job qualifi…
MAY122021_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
May 12, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History 102017, when the Petitioner was 16 years of age, the District Court i~ I( district court), issued an Order of Declaratory Judgment and Findings ( declaratory judgment order), determining that he was dependent on the district court; that reunification with his father was not viable due to neglect; and that it was not…