Search cases

Compare defaults: v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52 vs v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Reset

Results

Showing 126–150 of 7923 (page 6 / 317)
FEB202025_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 20, 2025 The Petitioner is a citizen of Guatemala who was born inl 12003. The Petitioner filed his SIJ petition on February 27, 2024 when he was 21 years old. The Director denied the petition because the Petitioner was not under 21 when his SIJ petition was filed, as the regulation at 8 C.F .R. § 204.11 (b )( 1) reqmres. On appeal, the Petitioner submits evidence t…
FEB202025_01D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 20, 2025 The Petitioner submitted a Supplement B from a judge of the ___________ I I California Superior Court stating that the Petitioner was the victim of domestic violence, and the criminal activity investigated or prosecuted was domestic violence under section 273.5 of the California Penal Code. The judge further certified that the Petitioner possessed informati…
FEB202025_01D8101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 20, 2025 Because the Petitioner did not indicate or establish the Beneficiary has received a major, internationally recognized award, it must demonstrate the Beneficiary satisfies at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(l)-(8). The Director determined the Beneficiary fulfilled only one ( critical or essential capacity un…
FEB202025_01H1212
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 20, 2025 Because the Applicant is residing abroad and applying for an immigrant visa, the U.S. Department of State (DOS) makes the final determination concerning admissibility and eligibility for a visa. Here, a DOS consular officer found that the Applicant was inadmissible under section 212(a)(l)(A)(ii) of the Act because she has not received vaccinations that are…
FEB202025_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 20, 2025 In denying the application, the Director determined that the Applicant's favorable factors, including her family ties to the United States, did not outweigh the unfavorable factors. The Director noted the Applicant claims she has a spouse and three children, all of whom are U.S. citizens. Her parents are also in the United States and are lawful permanent re…
FEB202025_02C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 20, 2025 The Director withheld USCIS' consent to grant SIJ classification after finding that the record contains documentation that materially conflicts with the requirement that an SIJ petitioner establish that they are under 21 years of age at the time of filing the petition. See 8 CFR 204.11(b)(1), (5). Upon review, we find that the Petitioner's evidence and argu…
FEB202025_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 20, 2025 The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was granted U-1 nonimmigrant status from June 2018 until June 2022. She filed her U adjustment application in May 2022. Thereafter, the Applicant was convicted in 2023 of misdemeanor DUI and sentenced to one day in jail plus 11 months and 29 days of probation, a fine of $670.50, 40 hours of community service, a…
FEB202025_04C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 20, 2025 Onl I2023, thel IJudicial District Court in Minnesota (Court) issued an Order for Guardianship ofAt-Risk Juvenile (SIJ order) appointing a guardian for the Petitioner. The order stated that the Petitioner "is unmarried and is between the ages ofeighteen and twenty-one." The Court determined, among other findings necessary for SIJ eligibility, that they had…
FEB192025_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 19, 2025 The Petitioner stated his proposed endeavor is "to develop innovative m1t1gation strategies and technologies to minimize or control scale formation and optimize the steel production process in order to create sustainable and high-quality steel." The Petitioner further stated he planned to continue pursuing his proposed endeavor in his current position as a…
FEB192025_01B7203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 19, 2025 The Petitioner asserts that she invested $500,0003 in the NCE, which is associated with The NCE proposes to pool up to $30,000,000 from 60 immigrant investors, funds which will be loaned to the job-creating entity,L_J doing business as I I, for the development, construction and operation of new vehicle production lines within its automotive factory in I I A…
FEB192025_01C1101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 19, 2025 A. Intent to Compensate The Form I-360, Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or Special Immigrant, as initially filed, indicated that the Petitioner would provide "no monetary compensation" to the Beneficiary 1 and did not include any specific information or supporting documentation about any monetary or non-monetary compensation. The Petitioner also marked "…
FEB192025_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 19, 2025 The Applicant claims to be eligible for derivative citizenship under former section 321(a)(3) of the Act because he was born out of wedlock, his parents never married, and he was not legitimated. A. Marriage of the Applicant's Parents On his application for a certificate ofcitizenship, the Applicant stated that his parents were not married at the time of hi…
FEB192025_01H2212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 19, 2025 The record shows that the Applicant entered the United States without admission or inspection in 1993. In I I 1999, the Applicant was convicted of Cruelty Toward Child/Child Abuse No Harm under Florida Criminal Code Section 827.03.1. The Applicant was subsequently removed from the United States inl 12018. Following his removal, the Applicant has resided in…
FEB192025_01H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 19, 2025 The record indicates that in 2016 the Applicant applied for admission to enter the United States and was found not to be in possession of valid documentation. He was placed in expedited removal proceedings and requested asylum. In 2017, an Immigration Judge denied the asylum request and granted withholding of removal. In 2019, the Applicant married his U.S.…
FEB192025_01M1244
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 19, 2025 The only issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has demonstrated that he meets the continuous residence and physical presence requirements to qualify for TPS under the 2023 designation of Venezuela. The Director determined that the Applicant did not meet his burden of proof to show that he continuously resided in the United States as of July 31, 2023. In…
FEB192025_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 19, 2025 The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Nigeria, married her U.S. citizen spouse, T-N-, 1 in New York in 2018 and filed her VA WA petition in March 2021 based on a claim of abuse by T-N-. The Director denied the VA WA petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not show that she was legally eligible to marry T-N- in 2018 because she did not demonstrate tha…
FEB192025_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 19, 2025 In October 2016, the Petitioner filed his U petition with a Supplement B signed and certified by the chief of police for the I I Police Department in I I Illinois ( certifying official). The certifying official did not check any ofthe boxes pertaining to qualifying criminal activities under Part 3 .1, and instead, notated that the Petitioner was the victim…
FEB192025_02E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 19, 2025 The Director requested evidence that the Applicant's father met the physical presence requirements of section 30l(g) of the Act and evidence that he satisfies the requirements of section 309(a) of the Act. The Applicant responded to the request for evidence with a copy of DNA test results but did not provide the other evidence requested by the Director. The…
FEB192025_02M1244
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 19, 2025 The issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has demonstrated that he meets the continuous residence and physical presence requirements to qualify for TPS under the 2023 designation of Venezuela. The Director denied the Applicant's request for TPS. In the denial, the Director concluded that the evidence submitted in response to a request for evidence (RFE),…
FEB192025_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 19, 2025 A. The Petitioner Was Not the Victim of Qualifying Criminal Activity 1. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her Form 1-918, Petition for U Nonimmigrant Status (U petition), with a Supplement B signed and certified by the I I Florida, Police Department ( certifying official), based upon a 20 ll incident whereby she was robbed. In re…
FEB182025_01B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 18, 2025 A. Ability to Pay the Proffered Wage A petitioner must demonstrate its continuing ability to pay an offered job's proffered wage, from a petition's priority date until a beneficiary obtains U.S. permanent residence. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). This petition's priority date is February 20, 2019, the date DOL accepted the Petitioner's labor certification applicat…
FEB182025_01B7203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 18, 2025 The Petitioner asserts that on October 19, 2016, she invested $500,0003 in _______ (NCE), which is sponsored by _________ 4 pursuant to the Immigrant Investor Pilot Program. According to the Confidential Private Placement Memorandum (PPM), dated 2016, the NCE proposes to raise $8,500,000 from 17 immigrant investors and invest in 2 As explained in Doe v. USC…
FEB182025_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 18, 2025 The Petitioner is a citizen of Mexico who was born in I 12005. In I 12023 when the Petitioner was 18 years old, the District Court of I I Oklahoma issued an order appointing the Petitioner's father as his guardian and finding that the Petitioner's reunification with his mother was not viable due to her abandonment and it was not in his best interest to retu…
FEB182025_01E2309
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 18, 2025 The Applicant was born in Cuba in 2006, and her parents were married in 2014. The Applicant was admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident in 2018 and her mother became a naturalized United States citizen in 2023. With her Form N-600, the Applicant submitted copies of her and her mother's birth certificates, her parents' marriage certifica…
FEB182025_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Feb 18, 2025 The Applicant entered the United States without inspection in January 1989, she was placed in removal proceedings, her application for cancellation of removal was denied by an immigration judge on I 2003, and she was ordered removed on that date. The Board of Immigration Appeals (the Board) affirmed the immigration judge's decision on August 25, 2004. The A…
Prev Page 6 / 317 Next