Search cases

Compare defaults: v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52 vs v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Reset

Results

Showing 4401–4425 of 7923 (page 177 / 317)
NOV292022_04C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 29, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2015, when the Petitioner was 19 years old, a Texas District Court for I I (District Court) issued a temporary order in a "Suit Affecting the Parent Child Relationship" (SAPCR), in which the court asserted its jurisdiction over the Petitioner and his younger brother; found that they had been subject to parental ab…
NOV282022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 28, 2022 A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History In 2015, the New York Family Court for I (Family Court) appointed guardianship of the Petitioner to her sister, finding that the guardianship appointment of the Petitioner, who was 20 years old, "shall last until [her] 21st birthday .... " On the same day, the Family Court issued an ORDER-Special Immigrant Juvenil…
NOV282022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 28, 2022 In our prior decision, incorporated here by reference, we dismissed the Applicant's appeal because she did not establish that she was a victim of a qualifying criminal activity. In that decision, we noted that the record contained multiple unexplained inconsistences regarding the Petitioner's whereabouts and involvement during the commission of the crime fo…
NOV282022_01G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 28, 2022 The El Paso, Texas ICE Field Office declared the bond breached, concluding that the Obligor and Co­ Obligor did not deliver the bonded noncitizen to ICE upon written request. The Co-Obligor does not contest ICE's conclusion. Instead, the Co-Obligor asserts that the ICE Form I-340, Notice to Obligor to Deliver Alien, sent to the Obligor and Co-Obligor was d…
NOV282022_01H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 28, 2022 The issue before us is whether the Director correctly determined that the Applicant is inadmissible under section 212(a)(9)(C) of the Act and therefore ineligible to file a Form 1-212 until he has departed and remained outside the United States for at least ten years. The record indicates that the Applicant entered the United States without being inspected…
NOV282022_02B4203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 28, 2022 Preliminarily, we note that while the Petitioner's appellate brief primarily addresses the Director's initial denial decision, we emphasize that the Petitioner did not appeal the denial order itself, but rather the Director's subsequent finding that its motion to reopen did not meet applicable requirements. Therefore, the merits of the denial decision, and…
NOV282022_02C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 28, 2022 In I I 2018, when the Petitioner was 19 years old, the California Superior Court for I I (juvenile court) issued Letters of Guardianship (guardianship order), appointing guardianship of the Petitioner to W-D-, 2 pursuant to California Probate Code sections 2310-2311 and 2890-2893. On the same day, the Family Court issued a separate order titled SPECIAL IMMI…
NOV252022_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 25, 2022 A. The Motion to Reopen Contrary to regulatory requirements, the Applicant's motion to reopen does not demonstrate their eligibility for the requested waiver. The only new documentary evidence comprises updated medical reports regarding the Applicant's father, a U.S. lawful permanent resident. The Applicant states that a doctor recently diagnosed their fath…
NOV232022_01A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2022 The Applicant, a native and citizen of Panama , was admitted to the United States as a U-3 nonimmigrant in July 2017 for a period ending in December 2019. She filed a Form 1-539, Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status, which was approved, extending her U nonimmigrant status until July 2021. The Applicant timely filed the instant U adjustment appli…
NOV232022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2022 The record reflects that the Petitioner was a professional soccer player in Brazil and ____ I lfrom 1993 until 2009, when he transitioned to coaching. The Petitioner initially held coaching roles with la professional team in Trinidad and Tobago, and has coached youth soccer teams since 2015. At the time of filing in August 2020, he was employed as the head…
NOV232022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2022 The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the Pe…
NOV232022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2022 The Petitioner filed her VA WA petition in January of 2019 indicating that she married D-O-, 2 a U.S. citizen, in I 2002 . The Director denied this VA WA petition, concluding that the Petitioner had not shown that she entered into the marriage with D-O- in good faith, as required at section 204( a )(1 )(A)(iii) of the Act. In our prior decision, incorporate…
NOV232022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2022 The Petitioner, whose undisputed date of birth isl 16, 1999, entered the United States on or about February 13, 2018. Onl 14, 2020, two days before the Petitioner turned 21 years old, the California Superior Court for I issued an order titled "Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings" (SIJ order), appointing guardianship of the Petitioner to L-S-. 2 This order f…
NOV232022_02B5203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2022 A. Eligibility for the Requested Classification As stated above, the first step to establishing eligibility for a national interest waiver is demonstrating qualification for the underlying EB-2 visa classification, as either an advanced degree professional or an individual of exceptional ability. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2). The Petitioner does not assert nor do…
NOV232022_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2022 The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States without inspection in January 2005 and began a common-law marriage to A- 1, a U.S. citizen, in 2014. He filed the instant VA WA self-petition May 2019. With the self-petition, the Petitioner submitted a self­ affidavit and third party affidavits. In July 2020,…
NOV232022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2022 The Petitioner filed her U petition in May 2019. The Director denied the U petition for lack of initial required evidence, as the petition was not accompanied by a properly executed Supplement B . On appeal, the Petitioner claims, through counsel, that she submitted a properly executed Supplement B at the time of filing her original U petition. She includes…
NOV232022_03C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 23, 2022 The Petitioner claims that he was born in Afghanistan inl 1997. Inl I 2017, when the Petitioner asserts that he was 19 years old, the Superior Court of the I Family Court (Family Court), issued an order titled ORDER REGARDING RESPONDENT'S EILIGIBILITY FOR SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE STATUS (SIJ order). In its SIJ order, the Family Court found that the Petiti…
NOV222022_01B2203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022 The Petitioner indicates that he is one of the few leading experts in the field of I biology and that he is well known for "his study of how the rapid I ofl I gene clusters enables al I aphid to colonize diverse plant species." The Petitioner indicates that he will enter the United States to continue his work in the field of I biology as a research associat…
NOV222022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022 The Diretor determined that Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the Pe…
NOV222022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022 The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Nigeria, married P-L-, a U.S. citizen, in I 12018.1 In August 2019, she filed the instant VA WA petition based on this marriage. The Director issued a request for evidence (RFE) seeking, among other things, additional evidence that the Petitioner had entered into marriage with P-L- in good fai…
NOV222022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022 A Relevant Facts and Procedural History lnl 12013, the Petitioner, at age 15, entered the United States without inspection. Soon after entering the United States, the Petitioner was apprehended by immigration officials and placed into the custody of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), Division of Unaccompan…
NOV222022_01D8101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022 Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that the Beneficiary has been nominated for, or is the recipient of, significant national or international awards or prizes in his field, it must satisfy at least three of the six regulatory criteria set forth at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(o)(3)(iv)(B). The Director determined that the Petitioner established tha…
NOV222022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022 The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant is inadmissible for fraud or misrepresentation, and if so, whether she has demonstrated that her qualifying relatives would experience extreme hardship if the waiver were denied. We have considered all the evidence in the record and conclude that the Applicant is inadmissible for fraud or misrepresentation. We…
NOV222022_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022 The issue raised on appeal is whether the Petitioner has established that the Beneficiary possesses a U.S. master's degree or foreign equivalent degree in order to qualify for the EB-2 classification and the terms of the labor certification. For the following reasons, we conclude that the Petitioner has not done so here. 1 As a preliminary matter, we acknow…
NOV222022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022 A Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner entered the United States in May 2016. lnl I 2019, the Family Court of _ New York (Family Court) issued an order entitled Special Findings Order (SIJ order). The SIJ order provided, in pertinent part, that the Petitioner is dependent upon the Family Court and has been placed in the custody of an individ…
Prev Page 177 / 317 Next