Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 4426–4450 of 7923 (page 178 / 317)
NOV222022_03C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022
—
Inl 12018, when the Petitioner was 12 years old, the Family Court of the State of New York to thel (Family Court) issued an order (guardianship order) appointing C-M-C-2, the Petitioner's aunt, as his legal guardian. The Family Court found the guardianship placement to be in the Petitioner's best interest. Based on the guardianship order, the Petitioner fil…
NOV222022_04C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022
—
In December 2020 , we issued a decision, incorporated here by reference, dismissing the Petitioner's appeal of the Director's adverse decision. We concluded that, as the Petitioner had not demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that her primary purpose in seeking a court order with SU-related findings was to obtain relief from parental abuse, negle…
NOV222022_05C6101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022
—
Inl 12018, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the family court in IN ew York (family court), issued an Order Appointing Guardian of the Person (guardianship order), in which it determined that the Petitioner's best interest would be promoted by the appointment of a guardian, specifically the Petitioner's friend A-M-S-.2 The guardianship order further sta…
NOV222022_06C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of India, submitted an SIJ petition in I 2015. The Petitioner included an order from the Family Court of the State of New York, ______ ( (Family Court) appointing R-S-2 as his guardian in guardianship proceedings. In a separate order titled ORDER-SPECIA…
NOV222022_07C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022
—
A Relevant Facts and Procedural History In I 12019, the Family Court ofl I New York (Family Court) issued an order entitled Special Findings Order (SIJ order). The SIJ order provided, in pertinent part, that the Petitioner is dependent upon the Family Court and has been placed in the custody of an individual appointed by the Family Court. The SU order furth…
NOV222022_08C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022
—
The Petitioner was born onl 19, 2000. Onl I 2020 , the Circuit Court for Maryland (Circuit Court) issued an order entitled ORDER REGARDING
FACTUAL FINDING PURSUANT TO MD FL§ 1-201(b)(10) (SIJ order) and ORDER GRANTING
SOLE LEGAL AND PHYSICAL CUSTODY ( custody order). The Circuit Court placed the Petitioner in the custody of an individual appointed by the C…
NOV222022_10C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 22, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History Inl 12017, when the Petitioner was 19 years old, the New York Family Court for I I (Family Court) appointed guardianship of the Petitioner to her paternal uncle, finding that such appointment "shall last until the [Petitioner's] 21st birthday." Inl 12018, the Family Court issued an AMENDED ORDER-Special Immigrant Juv…
NOV212022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 21, 2022
—
As a preliminary matter, we note that by regulation, the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision." 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i). The issue before us is whether the Petitioner has submitted new facts to warrant reopening or has established that our decision to dismiss the prior combined motion was based on an incorrect application of law or USCIS po…
NOV212022_01B7203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 21, 2022
—
In 2011, the Petitioner filed an EB-5 petition (2011 petition), in which he claimed to have invested at least $1,000,000 in the NCE. The Chief denied the 2011 petition and we dismissed the subsequent appeal in 2013. In 2015, the Petitioner filed his second EB-5 petition (2015 petition), again based his petition on his purported investment in the NCE. In the…
NOV212022_01B9204
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 21, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Egypt, filed the instant VA WA petition based on her marriage to J-H-. 1 The Director denied this VA WA petition, concluding that because the record did not establish the legal termination of the Petitioner's previous marriage in Egypt, the Petitioner had not demonstrated a qualifying spousal relationship with a U.S.…
NOV212022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 21, 2022
—
The Petitioner was born on 26, 1999. On I 2020, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Circuit Court for I Maryland, issued orders titled Order for Granting Sole Legal and Physical Custody and Order Finding Special Immigrant Juvenile Status. In its order, the Court placed him in the custody of A-L-D-, his mother, upon determining that he was abandoned by…
NOV212022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 21, 2022
—
In October 2014 , Petitioner, a citizen of Ecuador , filed the underlying U petition in March 2016 based upon an attempted robbery perpetrated against him . The Director denied his U petition, and he appealed the matter to us. We summarily dismissed this appeal; we also dismissed the Petitioner's subsequent motion to reopen and reconsider our decision. In o…
NOV212022_01D9101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 21, 2022
—
As noted, the Director denied the petition, finding that the record lacks evidence of the musical group I I nomination for or receipt of significant international awards or prizes for outstanding achievements. In addition, the Director determined that the Petitioner did not submit documentation that satisfies any of the six criteria listed under 8 C.F.R. §…
NOV212022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 21, 2022
—
By regulation, the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision." 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i). The issue before us is whether the Applicant has submitted new facts to warrant reopening our dismissal
of his first motion. We therefore incorporate our prior decisions by reference and will repeat only certain facts and evidence as necessary to address the…
NOV212022_02B2203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 21, 2022
—
The Petitioner is a human rights and political activist who indicates that he intends to continue his career as a political advisor and strategist for human rights organizations in the United States. Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has received a major, internationally recognized award, he must satisfy at least three of the a…
NOV212022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 21, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History On 12018J lbefore the Petitioner turned 18 years old, thel I (Kentucky) Circuit Court, Family Court, juvenile division (Circuit Court), entered an Order at a Temporary
Removal Hearing placing the Petitioner in the temporary custody ofE-G-P- 1, the Petitioner's cousin. The Circuit Court found that the Petitioner "has…
NOV212022_03C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 21, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In lof2020, the Family Court issued an Order Appointing Guardian of the Person (guardianship order) appointing a guardian for the Petitioner to last until she turned 21 years old in of 2020. The Family Court issued a separate Order of "Special Findings," (SIJ order) concluding that the Petitioner was unmarried and un…
NOV212022_04C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 21, 2022
—
A Relevant Factual and Procedural History Onl 12017, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Family Court of I New York (Family Court) issued an order appointing the Petitioner's mother as his guardian. In a separate order entitled Order-Special Immigrant Juvenile Status {SIJ Order) and pursuant to section 661 of the New York Family Court Act, the Family…
NOV182022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2022
—
As noted above, the Director initially granted the petition; however, the Director then sent the Petitioner a NOIR, explaining that the Director intended to revoke the approval of the petition because the record did not establish that the Petitioner qualifies for second-preference classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. See…
NOV182022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2022
—
The Petitioner married a U.S. citizen, C-R-T-, 11 inl 12009. They resided together from February 2009 untill 2016, the date they were divorced. In July 2017, the Petitioner filed a VAWA petition based on his prior marriage to C-R-T-, claiming that she engaged in abusive behavior. The 1 Initials are used throughout this decision to protect the identity of th…
NOV182022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2022
—
In 12020, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division - Family Part ______ _.(Family Court) issued an order (custody order) granting sole custody of the Petitioner to P-A-C- 1, a family friend. Additionally, in the custody order, the Family Court made determinations pursuant to section 9:6-1 of New Jersey Statut…
NOV182022_01D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed his Form 1-918 in June 2015 with a Supplement B, U Nonimmigrant Status Certification, signed and certified in 2014 (2014 Supplement B). The Director issued a notice of intent to deny (NOID) in November 2020 notifying the Petitioner, among other items, that the 2014 Supplement B was invalid and that he was required to submit a new Supple…
NOV182022_01D3101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2022
—
The issues before us on motion are whether the Petitioner: (1) has established that we incorrectly applied the law or USCIS policy in dismissing its appeal of the Director's revocation decision, and (2) has submitted new facts, supported by documentary evidence, to warrant reopening.
A. Procedural History
The Petitioner filed the Form 1-129, Petition for a…
NOV182022_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2022
—
In our previous decision, which we incorporate here by reference we determined that the 2015 order from a court in the Dominican Republic approving the parents' 1990 out-of-court custody transfer agreement did not have retroactive effect, because it specifically provided that the agreement became legally effective on the date the order was issued in April 2…
NOV182022_01H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 18, 2022
—
The record indicates, and the Applicant acknowledges, that the Applicant entered the United States without admission and was unlawfully present on at least four occasions: from the mid-to-late 1980s to early 1991; from around April 1991 to around December 1991; from around 1999 to December 2006; and from June 2007 to April 2008. In July 1991, the Applicant…