Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 4501–4525 of 7923 (page 181 / 317)
NOV102022_01H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 10, 2022
—
In 1994, the Applicant entered the United States without inspection, admission or parole, then was ordered removed in absentia in 1998, but did not depart the country. During those removal proceedings, the Applicant was charged as an "other alien." See section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii), Immigration authorities subsequently apprehended her and removed her from the Un…
NOV102022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 10, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed his SIJ petition in September 2016. The Director denied the SIJ petition, and the Petitioner filed an appeal. In our prior decision on appeal, we determined that the Petitioner had overcome the Director's conclusions that the Family Court was not acting as a juvenile court and had not made a qualifying determination that it was not in h…
NOV092022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 09, 2022
—
The Petitioner indicates that he is chief executive officer (CEO) and solutions architect for __ Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has received a major, internationally recognized award at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3), he must satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). The Petitioner…
NOV092022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 09, 2022
—
At issue on appeal is whether the Beneficiary meets the education and experience requirements of the labor certification. Section H of the accompanying labor certification states that the minimum requirements for the job offered are as follows: H.4 Education: minimum level H.4-B Major field of study
Master's
Counseling
1 The priority date of the petition…
NOV092022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 09, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in September 2017. Inl I 2020, when the Petitioner was 14 years of age, the Circuit Court of the I Judicial Circuit in and for I Florida (Circuit Court) issued a Final Judgment on a Petition for Custo…
NOV092022_01D9101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 09, 2022
—
A. Introduction
According to page 4 of the petition and page 2 6 of the O and P Classifications Supplement, the Petitioner intends to hire the Beneficiaries, musicians, singers, and dancers who perfonn together as the musical grouJ I for a period of six months to work as "musicians/artists" at "live shows, performances and theater shows" that it describes a…
NOV092022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 09, 2022
—
The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant is inadmissible for fraud or willful misrepresentation and whether he has demonstrated his U.S. citizen spouse would suffer extreme hardship upon denial of the waiver.
A. Inadmissibility
The Applicant was found inadmissible pursuant to section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for attempting to enter the United State…
NOV092022_02C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 09, 2022
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History In 2017, a probate and family court (family court) in Massachusetts issued an Order of Special Findings of Fact and Rulings of Law (SIJ order) in which it declared the Petitioner to be dependent on the court. On the same day, the family court also issued a Decree and Order of Appointment of Guardian of a Minor app…
NOV092022_03C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 09, 2022
—
The Petitioner was born onl 17, 2000. On 9, 2021 , the Superior Court of c=] I I California (Superior Court) issued an order entitled Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings (SIJ order). The Superior Court placed the Petitioner in the custody of an individual appointed by the Court and made other SIJ-related determinations. The Petitioner mailed his SIJ petitio…
NOV092022_04C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 09, 2022
—
Inl I 2019, when the Petitioner was 17 years old, the District Court for the Judicial District in I Texas (District Court), issued an ORDER OF DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND FINDINGS ( declaratory judgment). In the declaratory judgment, the district court found that the Petitioner is "dependent upon this juvenile court in accordance with the laws of the State of…
NOV092022_05C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 09, 2022
—
The record establishes that the Petitioner's date of birth is I 1999. The Petitioner filed his SIJ petition on December 29, 2020. The Director denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner had not shown that he was under the age of 21 when he filed the petition, as required. The Director additionally observed that the Petitioner did not submit a valid…
NOV092022_06C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 09, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, submitted an SIJ petition in July 2018. The Petitioner included an order from the Family Court of the State of New YorkJ I I (Family Court) appointing K-A- 2 as his guardian in guardianship proceedings. He submitted a separate order titled ORDER REGARDING MINOR'S ELIGIBILITY FOR SP…
NOV092022_07C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 09, 2022
—
A Relevant Factual and Procedural History lnl 12020, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, thel I Massachusetts Probate and FamilyCourt(Family Court) issued an order entitled Order of and Special Findingsof Fact and Ruling of Law (SIJ order) in which it declared the Petitioner to be dependent on the Court and determined that reunification with the Petitione…
NOV082022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
The Applicant is a 44-year old citizen of Mexico, who claims to have last entered the United States without inspection and admission or parole on September 1, 2006.1 In 2013 the Applicant married his spouse, who shortly thereafter filed a Form 1-918 Supplement A, Petition for Qualifying Family Member ofU-1 Recipient ( derivative U petition) on his behalf. U…
NOV082022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
As a preliminary matter, we note that by regulation, the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision." 8 C.F.R. § 103.S(a)(l)(i). The issue before us is whether the Petitioner has submitted new facts to warrant reopening of our decision to dismiss the Petitioner's fourth motion. We therefore incorporate our prior decision by reference and will repea…
NOV082022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
The Diretor determined that Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the Pe…
NOV082022_01B6203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
The Director initially approved the petition in March 2016, then revoked the petition's approval in August 2020 for the following bases, with each identified as an independent ground: • The Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary possessed the required experience; • The Beneficiary misrepresented her work experience; • The Petitioner did not establis…
NOV082022_01B9204
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Philippines, filed her VA WA petition in November 2019 based on her marriage to F-D-L-C-, a U.S. citizen.1 The Director denied the petition, determining that the Petitioner had not established that she was a person of good moral character, as required. In a request for evidence (RFE) issued to the Petitioner 1 We use…
NOV082022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
A. Relevant Factual and Procedural History The record indicates that the Petitioner entered the United States in 2011, when he was 15 years old. In I 2016, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the New York Family Court for the I I I INew York (Family Court) appointed guardianship of the Petitioner to R-S-,2 finding that such appointment "shall last until t…
NOV082022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, acknowledges entering the United States without inspection, authorization, or parole in 1999. The record further reflects that the Petitioner was arrested on several occasions for charges relating to a variety of offenses, including one resulting in convictions for felony battery under Florida Statutes section…
NOV082022_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
As a preliminary matter, review of this motion is limited to the basis for the prior adverse decision. Accordingly, we examine any new facts and arguments to the extent that they pertain to our summary dismissal of the Applicant's appeal. A. Grounds for Summary Dismissal Not Overcome The Applicant does not claim that the summary dismissal of his appeal was…
NOV082022_01H1212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
The Applicant is the beneficiary of an approved immigrant visa petition filed by his spouse. With his application to adjust status, he submitted Form 1-693, Report of Medical Examination and Vaccination Record. Part 10 of that form did not include any information regarding his vaccination record, but contained the statement "See waiver." In response to the…
NOV082022_01H2212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
A. Director's Decision
The record reflects that in 2007 the Applicant was convicted in the Municipal Trial Court of __ Province ofl I in the Philippines of serious physical injuries for an incident that took place in 1998. He was sentenced to a minimum of four months and one day to a maximum of two years, four months of prison with fines and restitution. Th…
NOV082022_01H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
A. Inadmissibility
The Applicant concedes, and USCIS records confirm, her inadmissibility to the United States under section 212(a)(9)(A)(i) of the Act. U.S. immigration authorities found her near the U.S.-Mexican border outside I Texas inc=]2013. She told authorities that she had rafted across the Rio Grande from Mexico and sought to live and work in Nebra…
NOV082022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
As a preliminary matter, we note that by regulation, the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision." 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i). The issue before us is whether the Applicant has submitted new facts to warrant reopening or has established that our decision to dismiss the prior motion to reconsider was based on an incorrect application of law or USCI…