Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 4526–4550 of 7923 (page 182 / 317)
NOV082022_02A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant, a native and citizen of Honduras, entered the United States without inspection in December 2006. He filed a Form 1-918, Petition for U Nonimmigrant Status, in March 2014 with a Form 1-918 Supplement B, U Nonimmigrant Status Certification, from the general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board. The Applicant wa…
NOV082022_02C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
Inl 12018, when the Petitioner was 20 years of age, the Family Court of the State ofN ew York,
I l(Family Court), issued an ORDERAPPOINTNG GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON
(guardianship order) appointing the Petitioner's aunt as his guardian. At that time the Family Court also issued an ORDER-Special Immigrant Juvenile Status in which it made findings under section…
NOV082022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her Form I-918 in May 2016 with supporting documentation that included, in part, a police report, a declaration (2016 declaration), and a psychological evaluation (2016 evaluation). The police report establishes that the Petitioner witnessed an argument between her son and his girlfriend inl I 20…
NOV082022_03C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The record reflects that the Petitioner is a native and citizen of Bangladesh. Onl I 2020, the Family Court of the State of New York for _______ New York (Family Court), issued an Order- Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJ order) an Order Appointing Permanent Guardian (guardianship order). The Petitioner filed his…
NOV082022_04C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In I 2016, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Family Court of I in New York issued an Order Appointing Guardian of the Person or Permanent Guardian (guardianship order) appointing the Petitioner's mother as his guardian in guardianship proceedings. The order stated that "the appointment shall last until the [P…
NOV082022_05C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 08, 2022
—
ln I 2020, the Family Court of I. New York (Family Court) issued an order placing the Petitioner in the custody of a guardian. On the same day, the Family Court issued an order entitled Order-Special Findings (SIJ order), determining that the Petitioner's reunification with his parents was not viable due to neglect and abandonment, and it would not be in th…
NOV072022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 07, 2022
—
The evidence indicates that since 2018, the Petitioner has been employed as a research associate with the I in I Illinois, receiving an annual salary of approximately $65,000. According to an August 2021 letter from his employer, "[a]s a research associate, [the Petitioner] is responsible for understanding the of the ex eriment and develo ment of the algori…
NOV072022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 07, 2022
—
The Director concluded that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. Accordingly, the issue to be determined on appeal is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. For the reasons discussed below, we agr…
NOV072022_01B7203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 07, 2022
—
On appeal, the Petitioner explains that in August 2016, she "purchased and acquired an existing dental practice froml She had worked as an orthodontist at the practice before the purchase. According to pages 5 and 6 of the petition, the Petitioner invested $1,425,000 in the NCE. She explained in the petition that her investment included 3 These requirements…
NOV072022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 07, 2022
—
A. Relevant Factual and Procedural History In 20116, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, thel !Family Court in New York issues an order appointing M-S- 2 as the Petitioner's guardian. In a separate order titled ORDER Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJ order), the Family Court determined, among other findings necessary for SIJ eligibility under sectio…
NOV072022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 07, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed his Form 1-918 in February 2016 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a sergeant ( certifying official) from the Police Department in Florida, regarding an incident occurring in 2005. The certifying official checked the box for "Other" in Part 3.1, adding that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar…
NOV072022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 07, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2017, when the Petitioner was 19 years old, the New York Family Court for the I I (Family Court) issued a Special Findings Order (SIJ order), determining among other findings necessary for SIJ eligibility under section 101(a)(27)(J) of the Act, that the Petitioner was "dependent upon the Family Court, in that the…
NOV072022_02H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 07, 2022
—
A. Inadmissibility
The Applicant is attempting to immigrate to the United States based on a relative petition filed on his behalf by his U.S. citizen father. The U.S. Embassy in Sanaa, Yemen refused the Applicant's application for an immigrant visa in 2008 under section 212(a)(l)(A) of the Act for health-related grounds. In July 2009, U.S. State Department…
NOV072022_03C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 07, 2022
—
The Petitioner was born onl I 2000. On I 2021, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Probate and Family Court of Massachusetts issued an order titled Order [of Special] Findings of Fact and Rulings of Law. In its order, the Court found that the Petitioner was dependent upon the Court; he was neglected and abused by his father; reunification with his fat…
NOV072022_03H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 07, 2022
—
The Applicant claims he entered the United States using a false passport bearing another person's name and date of birth. He posits this renders him inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) for committing fraud and misrepresenting a material fact. The Applicant did not present any documentary evidence in support of his claims of how he entered the United…
NOV072022_04C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 07, 2022
—
In denying the Petitioner's SIJ petition, the Director determined that the Petitioner had not satisfied his burden to establish that the record contained a qualifying dependency determination, as required at section 101 (a)(27)(J)(i) of the Act. In our decision, incorporated here by reference, we concluded that the Petitioner had overcome the Director's gro…
NOV072022_04H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 07, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Barbados, was found inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act, for fraud or willful misrepresentation, for filing a fraudulent Form 1-360, Petition for Amerasian, Widow or Special Immigrant, seeking classification as a Special Immigrant Religious Worker. The Applicant does not contest inadmissibility on app…
NOV072022_05C6101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 07, 2022
—
Inl I 2017, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Family Court of the State of New York, I ](Family Court) issued an order titled ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN OF PERSON appointing P-K-,2 as his guardian in guardianship proceedings brought under sections 103(27) and 1707 of the New York Surrogate's Court Procedure Act (N.Y. Surr. Ct. Proc. Act) and sections…
NOV042022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2022
—
The Director determined that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions with an advanced degree; her occupation qualifies as a profession, and she holds a baccalaureate degree and at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience equivalent to a master's degree. Therefore, we need not examine the Petitioner's parallel claim of ex…
NOV042022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, married a U.S. citizen, S-A-, 1 in I 2015. They have resided together from December 2014 until the present. In April 2018, the Petitioner filed the instant VA WA petition based on his marriage to S-A-, claiming that she engaged in abusive behavior. The Director denied the VA WA petition, concluding that the Pe…
NOV042022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a national of Honduras, entered the United States in 2017. In 2020, the Petitioner's mother filed for conservatorship with the Texas District Court, I Judicial District,! I (Court). The Court determined it had jurisdiction over the matter and issued an order appointing sole managing conservatorship of the Petitioner to his mother. The Court…
NOV042022_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant entered the United States without being inspected, admitted, or paroled in 2002, and began working for anl I factory namedl I in 2005. According to the Applicant, he was the victim of a severe form of trafficking and escaped before the involvement of a law enforcement agency that investigated the I company. In denying…
NOV042022_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2022
—
By regulation, the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision." 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i). The issue before us is whether the Petitioner has submitted new facts to warrant reopening or has established that our decision to dismiss the prior appeal was based on an incorrect application of law or USCIS policy. We therefore incorporate our prior decisi…
NOV042022_02C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2022
—
On I 2021, when the Petitioner was 20 years of age, the Family Court of the State of New York,I kFamily Court), issued an ORDER-Special Immigrant Status pursuant to its jurisdiction under section 113 of the N.Y. Family Court Act (Fam. Ct. Act), in which it made findings necessary for SIJ eligibility under section 101 ( a )(2 7)(1) of the Act. It found that…
NOV032022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 03, 2022
—
As noted above, the Director concluded that the record did not establish that the Petitioner qualified for classification as an individual of exceptional ability. Specifically, although the Director concluded that the Petitioner satisfied the criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A), (C), and (E), the Director concluded that the record does not establish t…