Search cases

Compare defaults: v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52 vs v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Reset

Results

Showing 4576–4600 of 7923 (page 184 / 317)
NOV012022_04C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner is a native and citizen of Ethiopia who attempted to the enter the United States in I 2019 without proper documentation and was placed in removal proceedings by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers.2 In 12019 the District Court, Judicial District, Family Court Division, in I Minnesota, issued a…
NOV012022_04G1103
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2022 The two issues on appeal are: (1) whether ICE provided sufficient notice to the Co-Obligor to deliver the bonded noncitizen and, if so, (2) whether the Co-Obligor substantially violated the terms of the delivery bond. For the reasons discussed below, ICE provided sufficient notice to the Co-Obligor, and the Co-Obligor substantially violated the terms of th…
NOV012022_05C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2018, when the Petitioner was 1 7 years old, the Circuit Court of the I Judicial Circuit in_ I Florida (juvenile court) entered an AGREED ORDER FOR RELATIVE CUSTODY ( order), granting legal and physical custody of the Petitioner to his brother until the Petitioner attained 18 years of age, pursuant to section 7 51…
OCT312022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 In our most recent decision, the dismissal of the Petitioner's fourth motion, we determined that the Petitioner made the same assertions and submitted a brief whose content was nearly identical to the one provided in support of the prior third motion. As such, we concluded that the Petitioner offered no cogent argument to demonstrate that we incorrectly app…
OCT312022_01B5203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 The sole issue to be determined in this appeal is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. 4 With respect to the standard of proof in this matter, a petitioner must establish that he meets each eligibility requirement of the benefit sought by a…
OCT312022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Senegal, last entered the United States in 1996. She had previously married her spouse, B-B-, 1 in Senegal in 1987 or 1988, when she was a teenager.2 After arriving in the United States, B-B- became an LPR in 2004. The Petitioner filed the instant VA WA petition in September 2018 based on a cl…
OCT312022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 A. Relevant Factual and Procedural History In 2020 when the Petitioner was 16 years old, the Circuit Court of the Judicial Circuit, in and fo Florida (Circuit Court) issued an order appointing C-K- 2 as the Petitioner's guardian in guardianship proceedings brought under chapter 744 of the Florida Statutes (Fl. Stat.) (guardianship order). In a separate orde…
OCT312022_01D8101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 The Director determined that the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the Beneficiary has been nominated for, or has been the recipient of, significant national or international awards or prizes under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(o)(3)(iv)(A). In addition, the Director concluded that the Petitioner established the Beneficiary's eligibility for only two of the evidentiar…
OCT312022_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 To establish acquisition of U.S. citizenship through a U.S. citizen mother as a child born out of wedlock under section 3 09( c) of the Act, the Applicant first must show that, at the time of his birth in I 1978, his mother: (1) was a U.S. citizen; (2) was not married; and (3) had been previously physically present in the United States for a continuous peri…
OCT312022_01H2212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 The initial issue raised by the Applicant on appeal is whether his 2001 conviction for assault on police was for a crime involving moral turpitude that renders him inadmissible under section 212(a)(2)(A)(i) of the Act. He asserts that the Director failed to conduct a complete analysis, and that his crime is not considered to involve moral turpitude. A. Cri…
OCT312022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 A . Procedural History In June 2010, the Applicant applied for and received a nonimmigrant visa to the United States. On her application, she gave her marital status as "married" and stated the biographical information of her spouse. She also stated that she and her husband lived at the same address. However, the record indicates that the Applicant's divorc…
OCT312022_02B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 In our decision dismissing the appeal, we agreed with the Director's determination that the Petitioner had only satisfied two of the initial evidentiary criteria and likewise concluded that the Petitioner did not satisfy the three additional criteria he claimed relating to lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards, original contributi…
OCT312022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 A. Relevant Factual and Procedural History In 2020, when the Petitioner was 17 years old, the Circuit Court of the I I.Judicial Circuit, in and for Florida (Circuit Court) issued an order appointing C-K- 2 as the Petitioner's guardian in guardianship proceedings brought under chapter 744 of the Florida Statutes (Fl. Stat.) (guardianship order). In a separat…
OCT312022_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 The Applicant married his first spouse in the Republic of Liberia (Liberia) prior to his entry into the United States. He entered the United States in 2002 using a nonimmigrant visitor's visa, he married a U.S. citizen in 2005, and she filed a Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative on his behalf in 2007. In support of that petition, the Applicant obtained…
OCT312022_03B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 The Director determined that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions with an advanced degree. The record demonstrates that the Petitioner earned a master's degree in communication sciences in Venezuela in 2002. 1 The remaining issue to consider is whether the Petitioner has established eligibility under the Dhanasar framework. The Petitioner…
OCT312022_03C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History In 12020, when the Petitioner was 19 years old, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division - Family Part inl I (Court), issued an Order of Custody and Special Findings (Order) appointing the Petitioner's mother, R-H-S-G-,2 as his custodian. In the same order, the Court determined, among other things, that…
OCT312022_03H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 The Director found that the Applicant is inadmissible to the United States under section 212(a)(9)(B)(II) of the Act because she had previously resided unlawfully in the United States for one year or more and then voluntarily departed the United States. The Director noted that the Applicant accrued more than one year of unlawful presence in the United State…
OCT312022_04B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 The Petitioner is a former customs official who was employed by the (China) Customs Office for nearly 18 years. He proposes to establish a company in the United States to provide consulting services regarding Chinese customs policy and practice to businesses in the U.S. and act as a customs clearance agent for them. The Director determined that due to the e…
OCT312022_04H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 31, 2022 The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant is inadmissible for willful misrepresentation and whether he has demonstrated his United States citizen spouse would suffer extreme hardship upon denial of the waiver. A. Inadmissibility The Applicant contends he is not inadmissible because he did not willfully misrepresent a material fact. The Applicant was f…
OCT282022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 28, 2022 The Petitioner states that he "is a world-renowned expert in developing and designing computer algorithms inl I supply chain manufacturing processes." In the ast the Petitioner has worked as an advisory consultant for a a business IT lead for a manager of technology consulting advisory services for and a senior product manager for I I Since 2018, the Petiti…
OCT282022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 28, 2022 The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus of a labor certification, would be in the national interest. In denying the petition, the Director concluded that…
OCT282022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 28, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 12020, when the Petitioner was 19 years old, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Trial Court, Probate and Family Court (Family Court) issued an order titled Judgement of Dependency Pursuant to G.L. c. 119, § 39M (SIJ order), determining among other findings necessary for SIJ eligibility under section 10l(a)(27)(J) o…
OCT282022_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 28, 2022 In this case, the Applicant concedes that he attempted to enter the United States in 2009 and was detained by border patrol officers. He was removed via expedited removal in 2009. He also concedes that he unlawfully re-entered the United States without admission in 2011, and departed 1he United States in 2018. The Applicant is inadmissible under section 212…
OCT282022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 28, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner is a citizen of Bangladesh. In 2017, when he was 19 years old, the New York Family Court forl (Family Court) appointed guardianship of the Petitioner to M-H-. 2 The same day, the Family Court separately issued an ORDER-Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJ order) making determinations related to the P…
OCT282022_02H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 28, 2022 The Applicant is currently in the United States and seeks permission to reapply for admission pursuant to the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 212.2(j) before departing the United States.1 The record indicates that the Applicant will become inadmissible upon departing the United States under section 212(a)(9)(A)(ii) of the Act.2 The Applicant contends that he is el…
Prev Page 184 / 317 Next