Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 4601–4625 of 7923 (page 185 / 317)
OCT272022_01B2203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 27, 2022
—
The Petitioner earned a Ph.D. in I information science and engineering from the University of in August 2018. At the time of filing, the Petitioner held the position of principal research engineer and chief executive officer atl I Because the Petitioner has not indicated or shown that he received a major, internationally recognized award, he must satisfy at…
OCT272022_01B4203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 27, 2022
—
As noted above, the Director denied the petition on multiple grounds, concluding that the record did not establish that (1) the Beneficiary has been employed abroad in a managerial or executive capacity for at least one year in the three years preceding the filing of the petition, (2) that the U.S. and foreign entities were doing business as defined in the…
OCT272022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 27, 2022
—
The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus of a labor certification, would be in the national interest For the reasons discussed below, the Petitioner has no…
OCT272022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 27, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In 2018, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Family Court of the State of New York in the I I issued an Order Appointing the Guardian of the Person, appointing P-N- as the Petitioner's guardian. 2 In a separate order titled ORDER-Special Findings (SIJ order), the Family Court made determinations, pursuant to se…
OCT272022_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 27, 2022
—
There is no dispute that the Applicant was born out of wedlock and that his biological father is a U.S. citizen. The primary issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has shown that he satisfies the relevant paternity and legitimation provisions of section 309(a) of the Act to acquire U.S. citizenship from his father. If this is established, the secondary is…
OCT272022_01H2212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 27, 2022
—
The Applicant is inadmissible due to his criminal history stemming from two incidents. The first from 1989 for assault with a weapon (a knife) for which the Applicant was convicted in 1990. For this crime, the Applicant was sentenced to nine months in custody and subject to a weapons prohibition order for five years. The second incident was a 2001 arrest fo…
OCT272022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 27, 2022
—
After reviewing the entire record, for the reasons set out below, we have determined that the Applicant has not demonstrated this waiver application should be approved. The Director concluded that although the Applicant established extreme hardship to her qualifying relative if they were separated, she did not make the same showing if her spouse were to rel…
OCT272022_02B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 27, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a technical trainer, project manager, systems architect, and entrepreneur, claims to be multidisciplinary expert in the fields of science, business, and education. He currently serves as the chief executive officer and CTO for several companies, and seeks to continue working in his field of expertise in the United States as CTO for I in I Ne…
OCT272022_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 27, 2022
—
As a preliminary matter, the Petitioner alleges on appeal that the Director "did not apply the proper standard of proof in this case, instead imposing a stricter standard, and erroneously applied the law, to [her] detriment." Except where a different standard is specified by law, the "preponderance of the evidence" is the standard of proof governing immigra…
OCT262022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 26, 2022
—
The Petitioner is an entrepreneur and researcher who is currently working in the United States in the field of cybersecurity on his 0-1 nonimmigrant visa.
A. Evidentiary Criteria
Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has received a major, internationally recognized award, he must satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory…
OCT262022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 26, 2022
—
A. Motion to Reconsider The Petitioner has not demonstrated that our previous decision is based on an incorrect application of law or policy, nor has the Petitioner's motion shown that our prior decision is incorrect based on the evidence before us when we issued the decision. 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(3). As stated above, the first step to establishing eligibili…
OCT262022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 26, 2022
—
A. Resolution of Filing and Clerical Errors Before reaching the merits of the Petitioner's claim on appeal, we must address a procedural issue related to filing and clerical errors by USCIS. In June 2021, the Petitioner concurrently filed an appeal of his denied SIJ petition (Form I-360 receipt number: Form I-290B receipt number:I I and a motion to the Dire…
OCT262022_01H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 26, 2022
—
The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has established eligibility for a waiver of inadmissibility pursuant to sections 212(h)(l)(A) or 212(h)(l)(B) of the Act and if so, whether a favorable exercise of discretion is warranted.
A. Inadmissibility
On appeal, the Applicant contests the finding of inadmissibility. The Applicant has been found inadmiss…
OCT262022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 26, 2022
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History Inl 2017, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Circuit Court forl I I !Maryland (Circuit Court) issued an order granting custody of the Petitioner to D-V-C- 3 custody proceedings brought under Maryland law. The order stated that "custody is granted in the best interests of [ the Petitioner]" and "[D-V-C-] is…
OCT262022_02H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 26, 2022
—
Upon review of the record in its totality, we will remand the matter to the Director for further review and issuance of a new decision. On appeal, the Applicant does not contest her inadmissibility under Section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud and willful misrepresentation. However, the Applicant contends that the Director did not sufficiently explain…
OCT252022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 25, 2022
—
We incorporate our previous decision here by reference, and will only repeat facts necessary to address the supplemental evidence and the Applicant's statements on motion. The record reflects that the Applicant has a history of arrests and convictions, all of which occurred after she was granted U nonimmigrant status, and several of which involved violent o…
OCT252022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 25, 2022
—
The Petitioner is a researcher in the field of I I biology, focusing specifically in the area biology. Because he has not indicated or established that he has received a major, 2
internationally recognized award, he must satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). In revoking the petition, the Director dete…
OCT252022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 25, 2022
—
The Petitioner is a medical researcher focusing in the area of liver transplantation. She obtained a bachelor's degree in medicine from _____________ in Brazil in 2010, and was previously employed as a surgeon and researcher at a hospital in Brazil. At the time of filing her petition she was a research intern at the University of I She proposes to continue…
OCT252022_01C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 25, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner claimed to be a native and citizen of Mexico, 2 and applied for admission at the Bridge of the Americas Port of Entry in I Texas in August 2018. The Petitioner was not in possession of any valid entry documents as required by the Act. Therefore, the Petitioner was apprehended and placed in the care and…
OCT252022_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 25, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Applicant, a citizen of Nicaragua, last entered the United States in June 2009, when he was 13 years old. The Director approved the Applicant's U nonimmigrant status based on abuse by his brother-in-law. The Applicant filed the instant U adjustment application in December 2014. The Director denied the U adjustmen…
OCT252022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 25, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Honduras, entered the United States in May 2019, at the age of 16 years. In 2020, when the Petitioner was 17 years old, the Superior Court of the State of Arizona for the I Juvenile Division (juvenile court) issued Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to Identity and Age…
OCT252022_03C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 25, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner is a citizen of India. Inl 2015, when he was 20 years old, the New York Family Court for I (Family Court) appointed guardianship of the Petitioner to his aunt, P-K- 3. The same day, the Family Court separately issued an ORDER-Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJ order) making determinations related t…
OCT242022_01A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 24, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant, a native and citizen of Honduras, was granted U-3 nonimmigrant status from October 2014 until September 2018 , which was later extended through April 15, 2020. She timely filed the instant U adjustment application in July 2019. In support of her adjustment request, the Applicant submitted a copy of her Honduran birth…
OCT242022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 24, 2022
—
Because he has not indicated or established that he qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, the Petitioner must meet at least three of the regulatory criteria for classification as an individual of exceptional ability. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A)-(F). In denying the petition, the Director determined that although the Petit…
OCT242022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 24, 2022
—
The Petitioner was born onl 10, 2000. The Petitioner filed his SIJ petition, which was received by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) onl 12, 2021. The Director 1 The Petitioner indicated on the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, that his brief and/or additional evidence would be submitted to the AAO within 30 calendar days of filing th…