Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 4876–4900 of 7923 (page 196 / 317)
SEP062022_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 06, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant is a native and citizen of Mexico who last entered the United States without inspection in June 1996. He was granted U-1 nonimmigrant status in October 2014, valid until September 2018, and timely filed his U adjustment application in November 2017. The Director denied this application, concluding that the Applicant ha…
SEP062022_02B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 06, 2022
—
As noted above, the Director concluded that the Petitioner met the evidentiary criteria relating to his authorship of scholarly articles and his participation as a judge of the work of others in his field. In our previous decision, we agreed with the Director regarding those two criteria, and determined that the Petitioner did not meet the following additio…
SEP062022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 06, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, entered the United States with her young child in December 2018, at the age of 19 years. Inl 12019, when the Petitioner was still 19 years old, the Family Court in the State of New York (juvenile court) issued an Order Appointing Guardian of the Person appointing B-L…
SEP062022_02H4212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 06, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant entered the United States without inspection in 1990, was granted voluntary departure in 1993, and given until I I 1994, to depart the United States. The Applicant did not depart by this assigned date and her voluntary departure was modified to a final order of removal. The Applicant indicated she departed the United S…
SEP062022_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 06, 2022
—
A. Immigration History
On I 2001, the Applicant was convicted of extortion in Armenia and sentenced to a total of one year of imprisonment, which included time he had already served in incarceration. A1menian code nullified that conviction roughly one year after the Applicant was release from confinemeni approximately in I I 2002. The Applicant filed severa…
SEP062022_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 06, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was granted U-1 nonimmigrant status as a victim of an attempted murder who was helpful to law enforcement, and timely filed his U adjustment application in March 2017. The Director denied the application, concluding that the Applicant's positive and mitigating equities were outweighed by the adverse factors of…
SEP062022_04A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 06, 2022
—
The Applicant, a citizen of Russia, was first admitted to the United States in October 2010 on a visitor visa. In March 2014, the Applicant filed a petition for U nonimmigrant status based upon an act of domestic violence perpetrated against her in I I 2012 (the qualifying crime). She was subsequently granted U nonimmigrant status from October 2016 until Oc…
SEP022022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 02, 2022
—
The Director determined that the Petitioner's endeavor has substantial merit under the first Dhanasar prong, and that she is well-positioned to advance her endeavor under the second Dhanasar prong, but concluded that the Petitioner had not demonstrated the national importance of her particular proposed endeavor, or that on balance, it would be beneficial to…
SEP022022_01B6203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 02, 2022
—
At issue in this case is whether the Director properly revoked the approval of the petition. For the reasons discussed below, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for further consideration and entry of a new decision.
A. Bona Fide Job Offer
A labor certification employer must attest that "[t]he job opportunity has been and is clea…
SEP022022_02D2101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 02, 2022
—
The Petitioner contends the petition is not subject to the regular cap. Instead, it claims that by virtue of the Beneficiary's master's degree issued by I I University, the petition qualifies for the master's cap exemption. The Director found otherwise and denied the petition, concluding that I !University is not an institution of higher education as define…
SEP012022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 01, 2022
—
In our February 2022 decision, we dismissed the Petitioner's twelfth motion as untimely filed. We explained that a motion on an unfavorable decision must be filed within 33 calendar days of the date we mailed the decision. 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l), 103.8(b). However, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we noted that USCIS would consider a Form I-290B filed with…
SEP012022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 01, 2022
—
As noted above, the Director concluded that the record did not establish that the Petitioner qualified for classification as an individual of exceptional ability. Specifically, although the Petitioner asserted that he satisfied the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A)-(D), the Director concluded that the Petitioner satisfied none of them. The Petit…
SEP012022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 01, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History 1nD 2018, the Petitioner, a national of Spain, entered the United States as a visitor through the visa waiver program. Onl I 2018, about two months after the Petitioner turned 18 years of age, the Petitioner's paternal aunt and uncle filed for his guardianship with the Family Court of the State of New Yorkl I ln 2019…
SEP012022_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 01, 2022
—
The Applicant has established that she meets several of the conditions for derivative citizenship under section 320( a) of the Act. Her birth certificate from the Dominican Republic demonstrating that she was born in 2007, her mother's Certificate ofNaturalizationreflectingthatshe became a U.S. citizen in June 2018, and her LPR card collectively show that:…
SEP012022_03B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Sep 01, 2022
—
A. Individual of Exceptional Ability In denying the petition, the Director determined that the Petitioner had not met any of the criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A)-(F) and, therefore, had not established that he was an individual of exceptional ability. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that he meets the three criteria addressed below. 3 An official…
AUG312022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 31, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a rhythmic gymnast, provided evidence that she was an active competitor in her sport from early childhood through the end of 2014. She indicates that she attended I I University from 2015 to 2019, where she studied linguistic methods of teaching Russian language.
A. Evidentiary Criteria
Because the Petitioner has not indicated or establishe…
AUG312022_01B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 31, 2022
—
The issue on appeal is whether the Petitioner has established its intent to employ the Beneficiary as a master tailor in accordance with the terms of the certified labor certification. The Petitioner initially filed a labor certification with the DOL for another beneficiary (original beneficiary) as a master tailor, which was approved.1 The labor certificat…
AUG312022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 31, 2022
—
A U.S. Department of State (DOS) consular officer found the Applicant inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud or misrepresentation. Specifically, the consular officer determined that the Applicant used a different name and date of birth in a 2007 nonimmigrant visa application. Therefore, the Applicant was found to have misrepresented…
AUG312022_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 31, 2022
—
The primary issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has sufficiently demonstrated that his U.S. citizen spouse will experience extreme hardship if he is denied admission into the country. If this is demonstrated, a second issue is whether the Applicant has shown that a favorable exercise of discretion is warranted in his case. The Director determined that…
AUG302022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
The Applicant is a 25-year-old citizen of Mexico who entered the United States without authorization in 1996. In June 2013, the Applicant was granted U-1 status from June 2013 until June 2017 based on his mother's victimization.1 The Applicant timely filed the instant U adjustment application in June 2017. The Director denied the application, concluding tha…
AUG302022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
The Petitioner founded al I franchise in Ukraine in 2011. He entered the United States in 2017 as a B-1 nonimmigrant visitor for business, and changed to 0-1 status in 2021 to work as global business development manager for smartphone app developer! 1 In a volunteer position as Chief Innovation Officer of the I I be co-founded "the innovation arm of I The P…
AUG302022_01B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
The issue we will address on appeal is whether the record contains substantial and probative evidence showing that the Beneficiary previously entered into a marriage in an attempt to evade the immigration laws. The Beneficiary entered the United States as a visitor in October 1994. He married I I (born on I 1997) in I 1998 inl I New York. Two weeks later, I…
AUG302022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Nigeria, last entered the United States in September 2018 on a nonimmigrant visitor visa, and married his U.S. citizen spouse, S-L-, in I I New York in I 2019. 2 He filed the instant VA WA petition in July 2019 based on a claim of battery and extreme cruelty by S-L-.
A. Good Faith Marriage
In the record before the Di…
AUG302022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
A. Relevant Factual and Procedural History In 2017, whenthePetitionerwas20yearsold, the IProbateandFamilyCourt(juvenile court) in Massachusetts issued an ORDER FOR SPECIAL FINDINGS OFF ACT AND RULINGS OF LAW, declaring the court's "jurisdiction pursuant to [ section 6, Chapter 215 of the Massachusetts General Law (MGL)] to make equity detem1inations within…
AUG302022_01D13101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
The issue before us is whether the Petitioner has "state[ d] the new facts to be provided in the reopened proceeding and be supported by affidavits or other documentary evidence," as relating to our previous decision dismissing its motion to reconsider the matter. 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2); see also 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l )(i), (3). The documentation the Petiti…