Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 4901–4925 of 7923 (page 197 / 317)
AUG302022_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
As discussed above, in order to acquire citizenship through her father under sections 301 (g) and 309( a) of the Act, the Applicant must demonstrate that: she was born to a U.S. citizen father; the father meets the other relationship-related requirements in section 309(a) of the Act; and, prior to the Applicant's birth, the father was physically present in…
AUG302022_01H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
The Director found the Applicant, a citizen of Peru, was inadmissible for willful misrepresentation of a material fact for procuring admission to the United States using a fraudulent passport. The Applicant does not contest the finding of inadmissibility on appeal. The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has established extreme hardship to her U.S. c…
AUG302022_02B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
As noted, the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision." 8 C.F.R. § 103 .5(a)(l )(i). This means that the scope of the instant motion filing (third motion filing) is limited to our September 2021 decision dismissing the Petitioner's second motion filing. As such, the issues before us are, as relating to our September 2021 motion decision: (1) whe…
AUG302022_02B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
In denying the Petitioner's request to withdraw the 1-140 petition on July 28, 2017, the Director cited the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 205.l(a)(3)(iii)(C) as the legal basis for the decision. The subject regulation reads as follows: (a) Reasons for automatic revocation. The approval of a petition or self-petition made under section 204 of the Act and in accor…
AUG302022_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Tanzania, married his U.S. citizen spouse, A-S-, in __ 2011, while the Petitioner was in removal proceedings.1 The Petitioner filed his VA WA petition in February 2017. The Director denied the petition, concluding the Petitioner had not met his burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he entered in…
AUG302022_02C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
In our decision dismissing the Petitioner's combined motion to reopen and reconsider, incorpornted here by reference, we determined that the Petitioner had not met their burden to establish eligibility for the SIJ classification because the record lacked a qualifying custody determination and a qualifying parental reunification determination. Specifically,…
AUG302022_02D8101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
Because the Petitioner did not indicate or establish that the Beneficiary has received a major, internationally recognized award, it must demonstrate that the Beneficiary satisfies at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(l)-(8). The Director determined that the Beneficiary fulfilled only one criterion, judging a…
AUG302022_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
The Director found the Applicant inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud or misrepresentation. Specifically, the Applicant misrepresented himself as married in an October 2018 B 1/B2 nonimmigrant visa application. The Applicant does not contest this finding on appeal. The issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has established extre…
AUG302022_03B6203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
The issue on appeal is whether the Director properly dismissed the motions. A motion to reopen must state new facts and be supported by affidavits or other documentary evidence. 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2). A motion to reconsider must state the reasons for reconsideration; be supported by any pertinent precedent decision to establish that the decision was based…
AUG302022_03C6101
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
In 2020, when the Petitioner was 18 years old, a county court inl !Nebraska (juvenile court) entered an Order Appointing Guardian for a Minor ordering that a third-party, J-O-, would be appointed as the Petitioner's guardian. 2 The order also contained findings that the "father of the [Petitioner] abandoned him at a young age. That the mother of the [Petiti…
AUG302022_04C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 30, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, claims to have entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in 2018. In 2019, when the Petitioner was 17 years old, a Florida Circuit Court in (circuit court) issued an Order Granting Petition for Temporary Custody by Extended Family (SIJ order)…
AUG292022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 29, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed a VAWA petition in February 2018 , which was denied by the Director in September 2021. The Petitioner timely appealed the adverse decision to our office in October 2021 by filing a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion . The Petitioner indicated on the Form I-290B that he would submit his "brief and/or additional evidence ... within 3…
AUG292022_01D2101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 29, 2022
—
Upon de nova review of the record, we conclude that the Petitioner has not demonstrated that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. Specifically, the record provides insufficient and inconsistent information regarding the proffered position, which in tum precludes us from understanding the position's substantive nature and determining w…
AUG292022_01D6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 29, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed the fiance( e) petition on August 31, 2020. As such, the relevant period during which she must establish she and the Beneficiary met is September 1, 2018 to August 31, 2020. In her initial filing, the Petitioner answered yes to question 53 on the Form I-129F regarding whether she and her fiance met in person during the relevant two-year…
AUG292022_01M1244
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 29, 2022
—
The sole issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that he has been continuously residing in the United States since July 29, 2021, and has been continuously physically present in the United States since August 3, 2021. We have reviewed the entire record, as supplemented on appeal, and conclude that the evi…
AUG292022_03M1244
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 29, 2022
—
The only issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has demonstrated that she meets the continuous residence and physical presence requirements to qualify for TPS under the designation of Haiti for such status. The Director determined that the Applicant did not meet her burden of proof to show that she resided in the United States as of July 29, 2021, and tha…
AUG292022_04M1244
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 29, 2022
—
The only issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has demonstrated that she meets the requisite continuous residence and physical presence conditions under the designation of Haiti for TPS. The record shows that the Applicant was last admitted to the United States in May 2019 as a nonimmigrant visitor for pleasure (B-2). On August 9, 2021, six days after Ha…
AUG262022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 26, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen oflndia, last entered the United States as a visitor in 2007. USCIS granted the Applicant U nonimmigrant status as the victim of qualifying criminal activity in October 2015. The Applicant timely filed the instant U adjustment application in December 2018. The Director denied the application, concluding that the Applicant…
AUG262022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 26, 2022
—
A. Evidentiary Criteria
The Petitioner is currently employed as a tattoo artist at _________ in I I Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has received a major, internationally recognized award, he must satisfy at least three of the alternate regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(i)-(x). In denying the petition, the Director…
AUG262022_01B9204
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 26, 2022
—
The record indicates that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, filed the instant VA WA petition in November 2019, when he was 22 years old, based on his relationship with his stepmother, B-B-, 1 a U.S. citizen. In a statement submitted before the Director, the Petitioner explained that he and his younger brother travelled to the United States to…
AUG262022_01C6101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 26, 2022
—
The Petitioner was born on I 1999. On 2020, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Superior Court of California, I issued an order titled Special ImmigrantJuvenile Findings. In its order, the Court appointed a guardian for him upon determining that he was a vulnerable youth based on abuse, neglect, and abandonment by his parents. The court further found…
AUG262022_01D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 26, 2022
—
The Applicant, a 34-year-old native and citizen of India, last entered the United States in February 2016. In May 2019, she filed the instant T application claiming her spouse subjected her to trafficking in the United States. Contrary to the decision of the Director, the Applicant has submitted sufficient evidence to establish, by a preponderance of the ev…
AUG262022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 26, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, filed this U petition in July 2015, based on an assault she suffered. Accompanying the U petition, the Petitioner provided two Supplement B forms, the first certified in June 2015, and the second in March 2020. Regarding the first Supplement B form, the Director determined that it was unclear whether the indiv…
AUG262022_01G1103
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 26, 2022
—
A. Procedural History
Onl 12018, the Obligor signed a Form 1-352, Immigration Bond, agreeing to deliver the bonded noncitizen to ICE upon each and every written request until the obligation terminates. The bonded noncitizen was ordered removed in absentia onl I 2019, for failing to appear at his immigration proceedings. On September 6, 2019, ICE mailed an I…
AUG262022_01H2212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Aug 26, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant was admitted to the United States with B 1/B2 nonimmigrant visa in 199 5, and he was convicted inl I 1999 of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in violation of section 784.021(1)(a) of the Florida Statutes (FL Stat. § 784.021(1)(a)), a third-degree felony. The Director determined that the Applicant is inadmissible…