Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 6276–6300 of 7923 (page 252 / 317)
JAN192022_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 19, 2022
—
In denying the Applicant's U adjustment application, the Director concluded that the Applicant's positive and mitigating equities were outweighed by the adverse factor of his criminal history such that a favorable exercise of discretion was not warranted. The Director identified several positive equities in the Applicant's case, including his three U.S. cit…
JAN192022_04A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 19, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of St. Lucia, received U-1 nonimmigrant status from October 1, 2014, until September 30, 2018, and his U-1 nonimmigrant status was extended from October 1, 2018, until May 30, 2020. He timely filed his U adjustment application on November 15, 2018. The issues before us are whether the Applicant has established that he has…
JAN182022_01A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 18, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of El Salvador, was granted U nonimmigrant status from October 2016 to October 2020. He filed the instant U adjustment application in April 2020. The Director denied the application, finding that the Applicant had not complied with the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 245.24(d)(5). Specifically, the Director noted that the reco…
JAN182022_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 18, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant, a citizen of El Salvador, last entered the United States without being inspected, admitted, or paroled in February 2014, when he was about 20 years old. He filed his T application in November 2018, asserting that he was the victim of labor trafficking during the course of being smuggled to the United States. The Direc…
JAN182022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 18, 2022
—
In denying the U derivative petition, the Director concluded that the Derivative was inadmissible based upon the underlying denial of his waiver application. In the denial of the waiver application, the Director concluded that the Derivative was inadmissible under the following provisions of the Act: • Section 212(a)(6)(A)(i), Present Without Admission or P…
JAN182022_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 18, 2022
—
The Applicant initially established that he meets some of the requirements for issuance of a Certificate of Citizenship under section 322 of the Act. Copies of U.S. passports and other USCIS records show that the Applicant's father became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1999 and his mother became a naturalized U.S. citizen in February 2011, before the Applica…
JAN182022_01H7212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 18, 2022
—
The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant is inadmissible for unlawful presence pursuant to section 212( a )(9)(B)(i) of the Act, and if so, whether the Applicant has established extreme hardship to a qualifying relative if the waiver is denied. Although the Applicant claimed that her last entry into the United States took place on November 1, 1996, go…
JAN182022_02D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 18, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, last entered the United States without being inspected, admitted, or paroled in, around November 2003. She filed her T application in March 2018, asserting that she became the victim of labor trafficking during the course of being smuggled into the country. The Director denied the T app…
JAN182022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 18, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Director denied the petition on January 15, 2020, and the Petitioner timely appealed the adverse decision to our office on February 10, 2020, by filing a Form 1-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion. The Petitioner indicated on that Form l-290B that she would submit her "brief and/or additional evidence within 3 0 days of filing the…
JAN182022_02H6212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 18, 2022
—
In denying the waiver application, the Director determined that the Applicant did not demonstrate fuat her U .S. citizen spouse would suffer extreme hardship upon denial of her admission. Although the Applicant submitted additional evidence on appeal, we summarily dismissed her appeal because she did not specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law…
JAN182022_03D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 18, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a citizen of Mexico, filed this U petition in July 2015 with a Supplement B executed by the Sergeant of Records Division ( certifying official) with the I I Police Department in Illinois. At part 3.1 of the Supplement B, the certifying official checked "Felonious Assault" and"Other: Armed Robbery" as the criminal activity of which the Petiti…
JAN182022_04D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 18, 2022
—
A Relevant Facts and History The Petitioner filed her U petition in September 2016 with a Supplement B signed and certified in May 2016 by a lieutenant in the I I Police Department inl I California (certifying official). The certifying official indicated the event forming the basis for the U petition occurred on I _ I 2012, but did not check any of the boxe…
JAN182022_05D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 18, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed the instant U petition in November 2020. The Director denied the U petition for lack of initial required evidence, as it was not accompanied by a Supplement B. The Director also noted that his filing did not contain required biometrics, including a photograph and fingerprints. 1 On appeal, the Petitioner states that he did not include a…
JAN142022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 14, 2022
—
The Applicant is a citizen of the Dominican Republic. The Applicant's mother filed a derivative U petition on her behalf, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) approved her derivative U3 nonirnmigrant status from December 2, 2015, to December 1, 2019. The Applicant was in the Dominican Republic at the time her U petition was approved, and sh…
JAN142022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 14, 2022
—
A. The Petitioner Was Not the Victim of Qualifying Criminal Activity 1. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in December 2015 with a Su]lplement B signed and certified by the Chief of Police of thel I Police Department inl Illinois ( certifying official) in January 2015, more than six months immediately preceding the…
JAN142022_01D8101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 14, 2022
—
A. Introduction
The petitioning agent, a graduate professor of studio arts at .__ ______ __.University ~I--~ .__ _______ __.I and the Beneficiary's mentor, seeks to represent the Beneficiary during her employment in the United States as a fine artist for a period of three years. According to her resume, the Beneficiary received hers Bachelor of Fine Arts in…
JAN142022_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 14, 2022
—
In order to acquire citizenship through his father under former section 30l(a)(7) and old section 309(a) of the Act, the Applicant must demonstrate that his father was E-F-;2 that E-F- was a U.S. citizen at the time of the Applicant's birth in 1955; that the Applicant met the legitimation conditions at prior 2 Names withheld to protect the individuals' iden…
JAN142022_01H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 14, 2022
—
USCIS records show that the Applicant completed a Form EOIR-42B, Application for Cancellation of Removal and Adjustment of Status for Certain Non-permanent Residents, and subsequently submitted a copy of this application to the Texas Service Center. Upon receiving the copy of the EOIR-42B, the Texas Service Center issued an I-797 receipt notice __________ w…
JAN142022_02D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 14, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition on January 4, 2016, along with a Supplement B sigqed and certified on July 2, 2015 by a major of thel I Police Department ( certifying official) i~ I North Carolina. In this initial Supplement B, the certifying official first selected boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the vi…
JAN132022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant was granted U-1 status from October 2014, until September 2018, and filed the instant U adjustment application in November 2018. In her decision, the Director noted that because the Applicant's U nonimmigrant status expired on September 30, 2018, and the U adjustment application was filed on November 5, 2018, the Appli…
JAN132022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The Director found that the Petitioner qualified for the underlying EB-2 visa classification. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. Regarding his claim of eligibility under Dhanasar's first prong, the P…
JAN132022_01B6203
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The I-140 petition was filed on June 1, 2017, accompanied by a labor certification that was filed with the DOL on May 24, 2016, and certified in December 2016. The petition was initially approved on June 12, 2017. However, the Director issued a NOIR in August 2019 and, after receiving the Petitioner's response to the NOIR, revoked the petition's approval on…
JAN132022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The Petitioner is a native and citizen of Mexico who entered United States without inspection in 2001, asserts to have suffered abuse while living with her common law LPR spouse from August 2004 to September 2012, and filed her VA WA petition in March 2018. With the petition she submitted a personal affidavit and statements from friends and family, financia…
JAN132022_01C1101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The Petitioner has not submitted sufficient evidence demonstrating its eligibility to classify the Beneficiary as a special immigrant religious worker because it has not shown that the Beneficiary possesses the requisite two-year religious work experience. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(m)(4); see also 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(m)(2). As noted, the Petitioner must establish t…
JAN132022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner came to the United States from El Salvador and resided with his aunt, K-, 1 who filed a Suit Affecting Parent-Child Relationship (SAPCR) in Texas District Court, seeking appointment as his sole managing conservator. However, the Petitioner then relocated to the home of another aunt, A-, which he states…