Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 6301–6325 of 7923 (page 253 / 317)
JAN132022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, acknowledges reentering the United States without inspection, authorization, or parole in July 2010 after being voluntary returned in 2009 . The record further reflects that the Petitioner was arrested on several occasions, resulting in several California
misdemeanor convictions and a felony conviction for Im…
JAN132022_01H3212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The issue on motion is whether the Applicant has shown new facts or evidence sufficient to demonstrate that her U.S. citizen spouse or children will suffer exceptional hardship if they moved to Cameroon temporarily with the Applicant and, in the alternative, if they remained in the United States while the Applicant fulfilled the foreign residence requiremen…
JAN132022_01H4212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant was ordered removed inl 12002. On appeal, the Applicantcontendsthatthe Director erred by failing to appropriately consider and weigh the submitted evidence. He also submits additional letters of supportspeakingto his good moral character, medical documentation, a letter from his church, and a letter from his older chil…
JAN132022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
A. Inadmissibility
The Director determined the Applicant was inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for willfully committing fraud or misrepresentation. Specifically, the Director noted that the Applicant made a material misrepresentation when he submitted a Form I-918, Petition for U Nonimmigrant Status and a Form I-131, Application for Trav…
JAN132022_01H6212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The issue on appeal is whether the Applicant's spouse would experience extreme hardship if the waiver is denied. The Applicant does not contest the finding of inadmissibility for unlawful presence, a determination supported by the record.1 The Applicant must demonstrate that denial of the application would result in extreme hardship to a qualifying relative…
JAN132022_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
In our previous decision dismissing the Applicant's appeal, incorporated here by reference, we affirmed the Director's decision, agreeing that the Applicant's U nonimmigrant status had expired prior to the filing of her U adjustment application. As stated above, a motion to reconsider must establish that our decision was based on an incorrect application of…
JAN132022_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
By regulation, the scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision." 8 C.F.R. § 103 .5(a)(l )(i). Accordingly, we examine any new facts to the extent that they pertain to our prior dismissal of the Petitioner's second combined motion to reopen and motion to reconsider. As noted above, the Petitioner's appeal was summarily dismissed pursuantto 8 C.F.R. §…
JAN132022_02D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in Se=tember 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a police lieutenant from the I I Utah Police Department ( certifying official). The certifying official checked the box indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to "Feloniou…
JAN132022_02D6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The Director concluded that the Petitioner's account of her relationship with the Beneficiary conflicted with numerous material statements made and documents submitted in prior petitions, such that the
petition could not be approved unless these inconsistencies were resolved. We acknowledge that in several petitions filed on behalf of the Beneficiary and h…
JAN132022_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The Director found the Applicant inadmissible to the United States under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for having obtained an immigration benefit by fraud or misrepresentation. Specifically, the record establishes that the Applicant presented a passport and U.S. visitor visa issued under another identity when she entered the United States in 1995. Beca…
JAN132022_02H6212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The Director found in his decision that the Applicant was inadmissible for fraud or willful misrepresentation under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for having used her Border Crossing Card (BCC) to enter the United States when she intended to remain to live with her spouse. Specifically, the Director found that after her marriage to her spouse onl I 2018…
JAN132022_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The Applicant filed his U adjustment application in August of 2019 and the Director denied the application in June of 2020, concluding that the Applicant did not warrant a favorable exercise of discretion due to his criminal history; specifically, for a 2006 arrest for shoplifting and a 2016 arrest for inflicting corporal injury on a spouse or cohabitant. I…
JAN132022_03D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in September 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a Lieutenant in the Criminal Investigations Bureau of the I I Police Department inl I California (certifying official) based on criminal activity against her in 2014. The certifying official checked the box indicating th…
JAN132022_04D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in December 2015 based on an incident that occurred inD 2000. With her U petition, she provided a Supplement B signed and certified by a Lieutenant in the Violent Crimes Bureau of thel I Police Department inl I Arizona ( certifying official). The certifying official indicated th…
JAN132022_05D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The Petitioner initially entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in 1997, when he was eight years old. In 2004, he returned to Mexico to live with his father. He reentered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole to reunite with his mother in 2006 or 2007. The Petitioner was arrested inl 12009 inl I Washington, f…
JAN132022_06D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The record of proceedings reflects that the Petitioner filed the U petition and the waiver application concurrently, but that the waiver application was rejected.1 The Director issued a request for evidence (RFE) with a due date in June of 2014, partly informing the Petitioner that he was inadmissible and that his case required a waiver application and rela…
JAN132022_07D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in October 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by an agent in the Police Department inl I Puerto Rico, rather than the head of the certifying agency named on the same form. The Supplement B checked a box indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity i…
JAN132022_08D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in November 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by the Chief Municipal Prosecutor inl INew Jersey (certifying official). The certifying official checked boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to"Felonious Assault," an…
JAN132022_09D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 13, 2022
—
The Petitioner acknowledges entering the United States without inspection, authorization, or parole in 2004. The record further reflects that the Petitioner was arrested on several occasions. After issuing a request for additional evidence (RFE) regarding the arrests and related offenses, the Director denied
the U petition after concluding that the Petitio…
JAN122022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 12, 2022
—
The Applicant is a native and citizen of Mexico who entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in approximately the year 2000. USCIS granted the Applicant U nonimmigrant status from February 21, 2014, to February 20, 2018, as the derivative child of a principal U nonimmigrant. The Applicant timely filed the U adjustment application i…
JAN122022_01B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 12, 2022
—
The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. For the reasons discussed below, we agree with the Direc…
JAN122022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 12, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner is a native and citizen of Kenya who initially entered the United States as a J-1 exchange visitor ~e 2001 and reentered with advance parole in 2007, married his U .S. citizen spouse J-N-W- 1 inL_J2016, and filed his VAWA petition in June 2018. With the petition and in response to the Director's request for evidence (…
JAN122022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 12, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History Inl I 2019, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court, I ! Division (Family Court) issued a nunc pro tune order titled, Amended Decree of Special Findings of Fact and Rulings of Law (On Complaint in Equity, filed,1 I 2017) (SIJ order),
determining among other findings necessary…
JAN122022_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 12, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Honduras, entered the United States irl I 2016 without being inspected, admitted, or paroled. In August 2019, the Applicant filed the instant T application, asserting that she was the victim of labor trafficking while being smuggled into the United States. The Director denied the T application concluding, in part, that…
JAN122022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 12, 2022
—
In August 2001, the Petitioner was admitted to the United States as a nonimmigrant visitor for a temporary period ending September 30, 2001. The Petitioner remained in the United States beyond September 2001. I~ I 2006, the Petitioner was convicted of one count larceny-under $200 and sentenced to six months of probation with the Holmes Youthful Trainee Act.…