Search cases

Compare defaults: v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52 vs v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Reset

Results

Showing 6351–6375 of 7923 (page 255 / 317)
JAN102022_02B5203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 10, 2022 The record indicates that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The remaining issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. For the reasons discussed below, we agree with the Dir…
JAN102022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 10, 2022 The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, filed her U petition in November 2014. On the Supplement B the Petitioner filed with her U petition, a sergeant with thel ,llowa, Police Department ( certifying official) indicated that in 2011 the Petitioner was the victim of qualifying criminal activity involving or similar to "Felonious Assault" and "Other:…
JAN102022_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 10, 2022 The Director determined that the Applicant is inadmissible for seeking to procure an immigration benefit through fraud or willful misrepresentation of a material fact. The record supports this determination, and the Applicant does not contest his inadmissibility. 1 Therefore, the issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has demonstrated that his U.S. citize…
JAN102022_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 10, 2022 The Petitioner acknowledges entering the United States without inspection, authorization, or parole in 1994. The record further reflects that the Petitioner was arrested on several occasions for charges relating to a variety of offenses. His convictions pertain to possession of an alcoholic beverage on a highway, street, or any public place (under 21); diso…
JAN102022_04D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 10, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition with a Supplement B signed and certified by a supervisor with the ~--....,,0-,------,-,, I California, Police Department ( certifying official), based upon a[=::12008 incident whereby she was sprayed in the face with pepper spray and pushed to the ground while her purse was taken f…
JAN102022_05D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 10, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In October 2015, the Petitioner filed her U petition with a 1 upplem 1 nt B signed and certified by a lieutenant in the youth and family services division for the Police Department Jcertifying official) inl I California. The certifying official checked boxes indicating that in I 2012, the Petitioner's child, who was…
JAN102022_06A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 10, 2022 The Applicant is a native and citizen of Mexico who entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in 1999. USCIS granted the Applicant U nonimmigrant status from May of 2016 to September of 2019 as the derivative of a principal U nonimmigrant. The Applicant timely filed his first U adjustment application in January of 2019, but that fil…
JAN102022_07A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 10, 2022 The Applicant filed the U adjustment application in September of 2018 and the Director denied it finding that he did not demonstrate that his adjustment of status to an LPR was justified. In making that determination, the Director acknowledged the positive and mitigating equities present in the Applicant's case including his lengthy residence, education, em…
JAN102022_07D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 10, 2022 The Director denied the Petitioner's waiver application, finding that the Petitioner was inadmissible to the United States under section 212( a)(2)(A)(i)(II) of the Act ( controlled substance conviction) and had not shown that he warranted a favorable exercise of discretion to waive the applicable ground. The Director concurrently denied the Petitioner's U…
JAN102022_08A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 10, 2022 The Applicant is a native and citizen of Guatemala who entered the United States without being inspected, admitted, or paroled in 2000 . USCIS granted the Applicant U nonimmigrant status from October 2015 through September 2019. The Applicant timely filed her U adjustment application in February 2019. The Director issued a request for evidence (RFE) in Janu…
JAN102022_09A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 10, 2022 The Applicant filed his U adjustment application in March of 2019 and the Director denied the application in March of 2020, concluding that the positive and mitigating equities in the case were outweighed by the adverse factors relating to his criminal history. Specifically, the Director detailed that the Applicant was arrested in 2015 for felony aggravated…
JAN062022_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Niger, filed the instant VAWA petition in October 2017 based on his marriage to Y-L-, 1 a U.S . citizen. The Director denied the petition as abandoned pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(13), after the Petitioner did not respond to a request for evidence (RFE) . 1 We use initials to protect the pr…
JAN062022_01D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 By itself: the Director's realization that a petition was incorrectly approved is good and sufficient cause for the revocation of the approval of an immigrant petition. Matter of Ho, 19 I&N Dec. 582, 590 (BIA 1988); Matter of Ma, 22 I&N Dec. 67, 68 (BIA 1998). The approval of a visa petition does not vest any rights in the filing party of a petition, as app…
JAN062022_01D9101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 We will dismiss the Petitioner's combined motions because they are untimely filed. Our appellate decision was issued on March 11, 2021. The Petitioner properly filed its motions in June 2021, 3 over 85 days after we issued the adverse decision. While the evidence indicates that the delay was due to the Petitioner's failure to include the correct fee payment…
JAN062022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 The issue in this matter is whether the Applicant has established that our decision to dismiss his appeal was based on an incorrect application of law or users policy. As noted, he contests both our determination that he is inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(e)(i) of the Act and our determination that he did not establish that his lawful permanent residen…
JAN062022_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of the Netherlands, married 1-C-, 1 an LPR, inl 12012, and they divorced inl 12014. She filed the instant VAWA petition in 1 We use initials to protect the privacy of individuals. December 2018 based on the marriage. The Director denied the pet1t10n, determining that the Petitioner had not estab…
JAN062022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in May 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a Lieutenant in the Detective Bureau of the I I Police Department in I I California ( certifying official). The certifying official checked a box in part 3 .1 of the Supplement B indicating that the Petitioner was the victim o…
JAN062022_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 The Director determined that the Applicant is inadmissible for fraud or willful misrepresentation of material facts in a prior B2 nonimmigrant visa application he submitted to the U.S. Department of State (DOS). The Applicant does not contest that he is inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act and seeks a waiver of this ground of inadmissibilit…
JAN062022_03D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 The Petitioner filed his U petition in December 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a Lieutenant in the Youth and Family Services Division of thd I Police Department inl I California (certifying official) based on criminal activity against him in 2015. The certifying official checked boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of crimin…
JAN062022_03H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 The Applicant, a native and citizen of China, was found inadmissible for seeking to obtain an immigration benefit through willful misrepresentation of a material fact. The record supports the Director's determination that the Applicant misrepresented her marital status on a B 1/B2 nonimmigrant visa application that was approved by the U.S. Consulate in Duba…
JAN062022_04D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 The Petitioner filed their U petition on January 19, 2016, accompanied by a Supplement B signed on July 16, 2015. In December 2020, the Director denied the petition, concluding that the duration of time between the submission of the U petition to users and the certification of the Supplement B was in excess of six months. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts t…
JAN062022_04H5212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 In the denial decision, the Director stated: Our records reveal that you are inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud or misrepresentation, specifically for obtaining a nonimmigrant visitor visa on May 24, 2012 through a visa fraud schemel ! Ito process nonimmigrants seeking entry into the United States. I I recruit customers for th…
JAN062022_05D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in February 2016 based upon anl I 2015 robbery perpetrated against her, along with a Supplement B signed and certified by a detective of the robbery unit of the I I Police Department ( certifying official). The certifying official checked a box indicating that the Petitioner was a…
JAN062022_05H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, does not contest her inadmissibility. The record indicates that the Applicant was born inl I on I l 1976, and first entered the United States as a B-2 visitor with her first husband and their four-year old son in 2007. The Applicant made at least two short trips back to Mexico and returns to the United States d…
JAN062022_06D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022 The Petitioner and Derivative acknowledge that the Derivative was arrested in 2012 and plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit robbery (first charge) and one count of robbery (second charge). The Petitioner was sentenced to 60 months' incarceration for the first charge and 96 months' incarceration for the second charge, to be served concurrently.…
Prev Page 255 / 317 Next