Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 6376–6400 of 7923 (page 256 / 317)
JAN062022_06H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 06, 2022
—
The Applicant does not contest the findings of inadmissibility related to unlawful presence and fraud or misrepresentation.1 Thus, the issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has demonstrated his U.S. citizen spouse would experience extreme hardship if his waiver application is denied. An applicant may show extreme hardship in two scenarios: 1) if the qual…
JAN052022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 05, 2022
—
The Applicant, a 27-year-old native and citizen of Mexico, entered the United States without inspection in September 1995, when he was one year old. His father filed a Form 1-918 Supplement A, Petition for Qualifying Member ofU-1 Nonimmigrant (U derivative petition), on his behalf, which USCIS approved, according him derivative U-3 nonimmigrant status from…
JAN052022_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 05, 2022
—
The Petitioner is a former professor of economics who has more recently been self-employed. She was issued a candidate of science degree in economic science in 2008 by the Supreme Certifying Commission of Ukraine, and previously earned a master of economics degree from the I I I I She states that she intends to continue to teach and publish research in the…
JAN052022_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 05, 2022
—
In our prior decision, incorporated here by reference, we determined that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, was ineligible for SIJ classification because he had not demonstrated that USCIS' consent to such classification was warranted. We explained that the record lacked a reasonable factual basis for the juvenile court's best interest dete…
JAN052022_01D6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 05, 2022
—
For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the Petitioner has not satisfied the statutory and regulatory requirements for classifying the Beneficiary as a K-1 nonimmigrant. In particular, we find two separate factors independently bar approval of this petition: (1) inconsistent evidence in the record; and (2) the Petitioner's failure to establish the…
JAN052022_01E2309
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 05, 2022
—
The general issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has demonstrated that he derived U.S. citizenship after birth. As stated, to derive U.S. citizenship after birth individuals who were born abroad must satisfy certain conditions before turning 18 years of age, including having a U.S. citizen biological or adoptive parent. As an initial matter, although no…
JAN052022_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 05, 2022
—
The Applicant was found inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for having made fraudulent and misleading statements in order to obtain an immigration benefit. The Applicant does not contest the finding of inadmissibility, but the issue on appeal is whether the Applicant has sufficiently demonstrated his LPR spouse will experience extreme hard…
JAN052022_02D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 05, 2022
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, filed his U petition in October 2015 as a victim of
felonious assault based on an incident that occurred inl I 1999. With his U petition, he provided a Supplement B signed on May 19, 2015, by a Chief Deputy ofthel I sheriff's Office inl I South Carolina ( certifying agency). The Supplement B indicates that th…
JAN052022_02D6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 05, 2022
—
Upon review of the record in its totality, we conclude that the Petitioner has not demonstrated that she merits a discretionary waiver of the two-year personal meeting requirement. The Petitioner filed the fiance( e) petition on April 13, 2020 and requested a waiver of the two-year personal meeting requirement, asserting that compliance with the requirement…
JAN052022_02E2309
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 05, 2022
—
The Applicant was born in Canada in01970 to a U.S. citizen mother and a Canadian citizen father. The record reflects that the Applicant's parents were married in I , 11970 in I I Nevada, and the Applicant's birth certificate lists his parents' civil status as "married." Because this evidence indicated that the Applicant's mother was married when the Applica…
JAN052022_03D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 05, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in August 2015 with a Suf plement B signed and certified by the Chief of Police at th~ I Police Department in_ !Missouri ( certifying official). On part 3 .1 of the Supplement B, the certifying official checked a box indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activit…
JAN052022_03E2309
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 05, 2022
—
The Applicant was born in Canada in01971 to a U.S. citizen mother and a Canadian citizen father. The record reflects that the Applicant's parents were married inl 11970 inl I Nevada, and the Applicant's birth certificate lists her parents' civil status as "married." Because this evidence indicated that the Applicant's mother was married when the Applicant w…
JAN042022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 04, 2022
—
The Applicant is a 28-year-old citizen of El Salvador who entered the United States without admission or parole in 2012 and has not left the country since. In 2014, the Director granted the Applicant derivative U nonimmigrant status based on his family member's victimization and assistance to law enforcement. The Applicant filed his U adjustment application…
JAN042022_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 04, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Kenya, entered the United States in April 2013 with a B-2 visitor visa. In August 2019, the Applicant filed the instant T application asserting that she was the victim of labor trafficking by a U.S. military contractor that employed her in Afghanistan before she traveled to the United States.
A. The Applicant's Traffi…
JAN042022_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 04, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in September 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a deputy district attorney in thd I Family Justice Center District Attorney's Office in I I California ( certifying official). The certifying official checked a box indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of crimin…
JAN042022_01E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 04, 2022
—
The record reflects that the Applicant was born in the Dominican Republic in I I 1977 to noncitizen parents, who were previously married to each other but divorced in 1976, over a year before his birth. The Applicant's birth certificate shows that his father registered the birth acknowledging the Applicant as his child. 3 The Applicant's mother subsequently…
JAN042022_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 04, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was granted derivative U non immigrant status from April 2014 until December 201 7, based on the sexual assault of his daughter. He timely filed the instant U adjustment application in April 2017. In our prior decision, incorporated here by reference, we determined that the Applicant had not established that hi…
JAN042022_02D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 04, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed his U petition in 2016 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a major in the I I Kansas Police Department ( certifying official). The certifying official checked a box indicating that inl 12010 the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to "Felonious Assault" and…
JAN042022_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 04, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed his U petition in April 2014. In the underlying record, the Petitioner submitted a Supplement B certified in January 2014 by an investigator in the State of Connecticut State's Attorney Office (certifying agency).2 In response to Part 3.1 of the Supplement B, which provides check boxes for the 28 qualifying criminal activities listed in…
JAN042022_03E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 04, 2022
—
We incorporate our previous decision here by reference, and will only repeat or introduce new facts necessary to address the evidence and arguments raised on motion. The Applicant was born in China inl 12012. His mother immigrated to the United States several months later in November 2012, and subsequently naturalized as a U.S. citizen in December 2018. In…
JAN042022_04D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 04, 2022
—
The Petitioner filed her U petition in August 2015. In December 2019, the Director issued a request for evidence (RFE) based on the Petitioner's inadmissibility. The RFE informed the Petitioner that she was inadmissible under sections 212(a)(6)(A)(i) of the Act, Alien Present Without Admission or Parole, and 212(a)(7)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, Nonimmigrant Witho…
JAN042022_04E2309
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 04, 2022
—
In our previous decision, which we incorporate here by reference, we determined that the Applicant did not establish that his mother satisfied the above requirement, because the affidavits concerning her residence and employment in the United States prior to his birth in 1967 lacked specificity and details and were therefore of limited probative value. We c…
JAN042022_05D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 04, 2022
—
The issue on motion is whether the Petitioner was the victim of qualifying criminal activity. The Petitioner filed his U petition in February 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a sergeant in thel I Police Department in I I California ( certifying official). The certifying official checked boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of…
JAN042022_06D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 04, 2022
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in October 2015 with a Form I-918 Supplement B, UN onimmigrant Status Certification (Supplement B) signed and certified by a sergeant in thel I Police Department inl !Tennessee (certifying official). The certifying official checked a box
indicating that the Petitioner was the vict…
JAN032022_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Jan 03, 2022
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, was granted U-1 status as a victim of an attempted murder who was helpful to law enforcement. He filed the instant U adjustment application in March 201 7. The Director denied the application. The Director acknowledged the positive equities present in the Applicant's case: his lengthy residence and his willingn…