Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 6801–6825 of 7923 (page 273 / 317)
NOV042021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in July 2015, asserting that she was the victim of qualifying criminal activity based on an incident inl ! 2009. The Petitioner submitfed a Sunn)ejent B signed by the Records Manager of thd I Sheriffs Department in....._ ___ ..... California. The Director sent a request for evidenc…
NOV042021_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2021
—
The issues on appeal are: (1) whether the Applicant is inadmissible for smuggling; (2) whether she is inadmissible due to fraud or willful misrepresentation of a material fact; and (3) whether she has demonstrated that her U.S. citizen spouse would suffer extreme hardship upon denial of a waiver request for either ground.1 Here, a U.S. Department of State (…
NOV042021_01H7212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2021
—
The issues on appeal are: (1) whether the Applicant is inadmissible for smuggling; (2) whether she is inadmissible due to fraud or willful misrepresentation of a material fact; and (3) whether she has demonstrated that her U.S. citizen spouse would suffer extreme hardship upon denial of a waiver request for either ground.1 Here, a U.S. Department of State (…
NOV042021_02A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2021
—
The Applicant is a native and citizen of Mexico who last entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in March of 2003. USCIS granted the Applicant U nonimmigrant status from October 1, 2014, to September 30, 2018, as a victim of felonious assault who was helpful in the investigation of the crime. The Applicant timely filed the U adjus…
NOV042021_02C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2021
—
The Petitioner was born o~ Ii 99 5. Otj I 2016, when the Petitioner was 20 years old and one day prior to her 21st birthday, the Circuit Court for~ _____ __,Maryland (Circuit Court) entered an Order Regarding Minor's Eligibility for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status. The Circuit Court placed the Petitioner in the custody of another individual and made addit…
NOV042021_02D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2021
—
The Applicant, a 40-year-old native and citizen of Mexico, last entered the United States without being inspected, admitted, or paroled on or about February 2004.2 In April 2019, he filed his T application claiming smugglers recruited, provided, transported, harbored, and obtained him through force, fraud, and coercion for the purpose of involuntary servitu…
NOV042021_02D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2021
—
A. Factual and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in October 2015. Included in the initial filing were police reports and court records describing incidents that occurred irl 12014. Thel I Sheriff's Office's incident report (incident report) datedl 12014 contained a narrative portion stating, in relevant part: The Petitioner agreed to me…
NOV042021_02H7212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2021
—
The Applicant is the spouse of a U.S. citizen. He was found inadmissible under section 212(a)(3)(D)(i) of the Act due to his membership in the CCP. The Field Office Director denied the waiver application, concluding that the Applicant was not eligible for an exception to, or a waiver of, inadmissibility under section 212(a)(3)(D)(ii)-(iv) of the Act.
A. Me…
NOV042021_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2021
—
The Applicant, a citizen of Guatemala, was granted U nonimmigrant status in December 2013. The Applicant timely filed the instant U adjustment application in November 2017. The Director denied the application, determining that the Applicant had not demonstrated that his adjustment of status to that of an LPR was justified on humanitarian grounds, to ensure…
NOV042021_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2021
—
A. The Petitioner Was Not the Victim of Qualifying Criminal Activity The Petitioner filed his U retitiln in September 2015 with a Supplement B signed and certified by a Records Supervisor of the Michigan Police Records Department ( certifying official), based on a criminal offense perpetrated against the Petitioner in 2009. In the Supplement B, the certifyi…
NOV042021_04D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 04, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native or citizen of Romania, claims to have last entered the United States in 2004 and filed for T classification in January 2018.
A. The Applicant's Trafficking Claim
The record reflects the Applicant entered the United States in April 2004 on an H-2B visa to work as a housekeeper for E-H- 1, a U.S. company in the hotel industry in Flori…
NOV032021_01A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 03, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, last entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in July 1995. In May 2014, USCIS granted the Applicant U-2 status as a spouse of a victim of a qualifying criminal activity under section 245(m) of the Act. The Applicant timely filed the instant U adjustment application in May 201 7. The D…
NOV032021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 03, 2021
—
InC]2019, when the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, was 20 years old, a probate and family court in I , I Massachusetts issued a judgment that declares him "dependent upon the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for his care and protection" and provides that "this custody continues under the jurisdiction of this Court .... " The judgment further sta…
NOV032021_02B5203
Accepted
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 03, 2021
—
The labor certification in this case is ambiguous with regard to the mm1mum educational and experience requirements for the proffered position of systems analyst. Sections H.4, H.8, and H. l 0 indicate that a bachelor's degree (in computer science, software engineering, information technology, or a related field) and two years of experience (in any suitable…
NOV032021_02C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 03, 2021
—
A. Relevant Factual and Procedural History Inl I 2018, when the Petitioner was 20 years old, a probate and family court in Massachusetts issued an order entitled Judgment and Order for Special Findings of Fact and Rulings of Law (SIJ order). The order states, in pertinent part, that the court "has jurisdiction pursuant to M.G.L. c. 215, § 6 to make equity d…
NOV022021_01B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
A. Relevant Factual and Procedural History The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Kenya, entered the United States on a student visa in December 2005. Inl 12007, he married T-W-, 1 a U.S. citizen, and they divorced inl 12010. InC]2010, the Petitioner married H-D-, who is also a U.S. citizen. In April 2017, he filed the instant VA W…
NOV022021_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of the Philippines, most recently entered the United States on an H-2B visa in July 2007 . In January 2018, she filed the instant T application.
A. The Applicant's Trafficking Claim
In her written statements before the Director and in response to our notice of intent to dismiss (NOID), the Applicant explained that while…
NOV022021_01H2212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
The Applicant does not dispute his inadmissibility for involvement in offenses involving prostitution. He seeks a waiver of this ground of inadmissibility, asserting that his U.S. citizen spouse would experience extreme hardship if the waiver application were denied. An applicant may show extreme hardship in two scenarios: 1) if the qualifying relatives rem…
NOV022021_01H6212
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
We have reviewed the entire record and conclude that the applicant has not established that he has a qualifying relative as described in section 212(a)(9)(B)(v) of the Act. Furthermore, although not discussed in the Director's decision, based on the information provided in the waiver application it appears that the Applicant is also permanently inadmissible…
NOV022021_01H7212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant is inadmissible under sections 212(a)(6)(C)(i) and 212(a)(6)(E)(i) of the Act, and if so, whether he is eligible for a waiver of inadmissibility. The record reflects that during an interview with a U.S. Department of State consular officer, 1he Applicant posed as the spouse of his sister-in-law in order to assi…
NOV022021_02B9204
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
The Petitioner, a native and citizen of Brazil, married H-S-, 1 a U .S. citizen, in 2007, and they divorced in02016. In October 2018 , the Petitioner filed her VA WA petition based on her marriage. The 1 We use initials to protect identities.
Director denied the petition, finding that the Petitioner did not establish a qualifying relationship with her U.S.…
NOV022021_02D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, claims to have last entered the United States without being inspected, admitted, or paroled, in May 2007. In May 2018, the Applicant filed the instant T application, asserting that he was the victim of labor trafficking by the smugglers he had hired to transport him into the United States.
A. The Applicant's T…
NOV022021_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
The Applicant does not dispute that she is inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for seeking to obtain an immigration benefit by fraud or willful misrepresentation of a material fact. (She used a fraudulently obtained passport to enter the United States.) She seeks a waiver of this ground
of inadmissibility. In our December 2020 dismissal o…
NOV022021_03H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant is inadmissible under sections 212(a)(6)(C)(i) and 212(a)(6)(E)(i) of the Act, and if so, whether he is eligible for a waiver of inadmissibility. The record reflects that during an interview with a U.S. Department of State consular officer, 1he Applicant posed as the spouse of his sister-in-law in order to assi…
NOV022021_04H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
The Applicant was found inadmissible for fraud or willful misrepresentation for participating in what she admitted to a U.S. Department of State consular officer was a sham divorce in support of an immigrant visa application in 2001. She does not contest her inadmissibility. The Applicant must demonstrate that denial of the application would result in extre…