Search cases
Compare defaults:
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52
vs
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med
Results
Showing 6826–6850 of 7923 (page 274 / 317)
NOV022021_05H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
The Applicant was found inadmissible for fraud or willful misrepresentation in conjunction with statements he made regarding his previous marriage to a U.S. citizen and the immigrant petition she filed on his behalf. He does not challenge his inadmissibility due to fraud or misrepresentation. Although he previously submitted evidence regarding hardship to b…
NOV022021_06H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
The Applicant contends that the Director erred in finding her inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud or misrepresentation.2 Accordingly, the issues on appeal are whether the Applicant is inadmissible for misrepresentation, and whether she has established that her fiance would suffer extreme hardship if the waiver is not granted. We…
NOV022021_08H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
The Applicant does not contest that she is inadmissible to the United States under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for having obtained an immigration benefit by fraud or misrepresentation.1 The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant has established extreme hardship to her spouse and, if so, whether she merits a waiver as a matter of discretion. We ha…
NOV022021_09H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
As stated in the Director's denial decision, the Applicant, who lives in the Dominican Republic, willfully misrepresented a material fact in her K-1 visa interview in 2006, 1 and was therefore inadmissible to the United States under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act. On appeal the Applicant submits a statement in which she claims that her relationship with…
NOV022021_10H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 02, 2021
—
The Applicant contends that the Director erred in finding her inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act for fraud or misrepresentation.2 Accordingly, the issues on appeal are whether the Applicant is inadmissible for misrepresentation, and whether she has established that her fiance would suffer extreme hardship if the waiver is not granted. We…
NOV012021_01B2203
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2021
—
The Petitioner is a martial arts competitor andl I coach/consultant for competitions, stunts, and related training. He intends to enter the United States to work as ~ I martial arts coach.
A. Evidentiary Criteria
Because the Petitioner has not indicated or established that he has received a major, internationally recognized award, he must satisfy at least…
NOV012021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2021
—
The record reflects that the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Guatemala, was born onl 11998. Onl ! 2019, a Probate and Family Court inl !Massachusetts issued an order entitled Special
Findings of Fact and Rulings of Law (SIJ order) making findings relevant to SIJ eligibility under section 10l(a)(27)(J) of the Act. Based on this order, the Petitioner fil…
NOV012021_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Mexico, claims that she entered the United States in June 2008 without inspection, admission, or parole. The Applicant filed her T application in April 2018. The Director denied the T application upon concluding that the Applicant was not physically present in the United States on account of a severe form of traffickin…
NOV012021_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2021
—
The Director found that the Applicant is inadmissible for willful misrepresentation under section 212(a)(6)(e)(i) of the Act. The Applicant initially obtained Temporary Protected Status (TPS) using her cousin's identity in 2002. She then continued to renew her TPS with the falsified identity nine times until 2016. 1 In denying her application for a waiver,…
NOV012021_02A6245
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2021
—
The Applicant, a citizen of Mexico, last entered the United States without inspection, admission, or parole in 1987, when he was approximately 19 years of age. In October 2015, the Applicant was granted derivative U-2 nonimmigrant status. The Applicant filed the instant U adjustment application in December 2018. The Director denied the application in July 2…
NOV012021_02D12101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2021
—
The Applicant is a citizen of India who first entered the United States in March 1998. He filed his T application in July 2018 on the basis that he was a victim of labor trafficking. The Director denied the T application after concluding that he had not established that he is physically present in the United States on account of such trafficking.
A. The Ap…
NOV012021_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2021
—
The Applicant does not contest her inadmissibility, as described in the Director's decision, which we incorporate here. The Applicant's qualifying relative spouse provided a statement explaining that he suffers from chronic back pain and has a history of kidney stones, conditions which create debilitating pain. With this appeal, he included documentation to…
NOV012021_03A6245
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History The record reflects that the Applicant, a citizen of Mexico who initially entered the United States without inspection in 1999, adjusted her status to that of an LPR spouse of a U.S. citizen in 2003. Four years later the Applicant was arrested for transporting nine undocumented migrants in her truck; in 2008 she was…
NOV012021_03D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2021
—
The Applicant is a citizen of the Philippines who was last admitted to the United States as an H-2B nonimmigrant (temporary non-agricultural worker) m December 2005 to be employed as a housekeeper at I IHotell I in Florida until July 1 The definition of a severe form of trafficking also includes commercial sex trafficking, which does not apply in this case.…
NOV012021_03D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2021
—
In November 2015, the Petitioner filed the instant U petition. In support of her claim, the Petitioner submitted a Form 1-918, Supplement B, U Nonimmigrant Status Certification (Supplement B), as well as her personal statement, a crime report, and a letter from a trauma recovery center. Subsequently, in response to a request for evidence (RFE) issued by the…
NOV012021_04D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2021
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History The Petitioner filed her U petition in October 2015 with a Supplement B signed by a Lieutenant in the Youth and Family Services Division of th~ I California Police Department ( certifying official) in May 2015 regarding an incident the Petitioner experienced in 2003. In the Supplement B, the certifying official ch…
NOV012021_05D14101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Nov 01, 2021
—
A. Relevant Facts and Procedural History In January 2016, the Petitioner filed her U petition with a Supplement B signed and certified in September 2015, by a captain of thel • I Station inl I California ( certifying official). The certifying official checked boxes indicating that the Petitioner was the victim of criminal activity involving or similar to "F…
OCT292021_01C6101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 29, 2021
—
1n02019, when the Petitioner, a native and citizen of Venezuela, was 17 years old, the Family Court for I I Delaware (Family Court) issued an Order (SIJ order) granting
guardianship of the Petitioner to her aunt and uncle. The SIJ order states, in pertinent part, that its grant of guardianship is due to testimony in the record establishing that a close rel…
OCT292021_01D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 29, 2021
—
The Applicant, a 34-year-old native and citizen of Honduras, last entered the United States without being inspected, admitted, or paroled on or about January 2014. In January 2019, he filed his T application claiming smugglers recruited, transported, harbored, and obtained him through force, fraud, and coercion for the purpose of involuntary servitude, debt…
OCT292021_01D14101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 29, 2021
—
In May of 2015 the Petitioner filed the U petition with the first Supplement B that was not properly completed, nor was it certified by a proper official. Nevertheless, this Supplement B contained a checked box for Other and the official listed the criminal activity as robbery. It did not cite to any violated statute under Part 3 .3 other than to state she…
OCT292021_01D6101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 29, 2021
—
The Petitioner filed the fiance( e) petition on January 3, 2020 and did not seek a waiver of the two-year in person meeting requirement. Instead, he submitted evidence that he and the Beneficiary lived and spent time together prior to the Beneficiary's last departure from the U.S. on January 27, 2018. The Director issued a request for evidence (RFE), reques…
OCT292021_01H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 29, 2021
—
The issues on appeal are whether the Applicant is inadmissible for willful misrepresentation and fraud and whether he has demonstrated his lawful permanent resident spouse would suffer extreme hardship upon denial of the waiver.
A. Inadmissibility
The Applicant disputes the Director's finding of inadmissibility and argues that he did not willfully misrepre…
OCT292021_02D12101
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 29, 2021
—
The Applicant, a native and citizen of Indonesia, entered the United States in August 2002 as an A3 domestic employee of a foreign official. In May 2019, the Applicant filed the instant T application, asserting that she was the victim of labor trafficking, having been recruited and transported by
N-Z- and obtained by R- and A-W- through fraud and coercion…
OCT292021_02F1101
Remanded
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 29, 2021
—
A. Relevant Evidence and Procedural History The Beneficiary, F-C- 1, was born in I I 2014. The birth certificate in the record lists her mother as N-Z- and her father as S-B-.2 The Beneficiar:y was placed into.__ ____________ _. a government licensed orphanage, in I j 2015 and upon order of the High Court of Uganda (Family Division), after N-Z- and S-B- att…
OCT292021_02H5212
Dismissed
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt52: Missing
v3_no_parsed_rules_gpt5mini_med: Missing
Oct 29, 2021
—
An applicant may show extreme hardship in two scenarios: (1) if the qualifying relative remains in the United States separated from the applicant; and (2) if the qualifying relative relocates overseas with the applicant. See 9 USCJS Policy Manual B.4(B), https://www.uscis.gov/policy manual/volume-9-part-b-chapter-4 (providing, as guidance, the scenarios to…